It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Now, you can feel that I'm being unfair. You can tell me I'm just an asshole, but the reasoning is sound, and the data is there for anyone to take a glance at. This is the beginning of the collapse of civilization as we know it. Eventually, it will snowball and anarchy will ensue. That is IF the ruling class sit by and do nothing to generate eugenic effects on the population. Many are already underway, but it seems the stupid are breeding at too high a rate to combat this by benevolent means alone. That's my .02c. Let the flaming ensue, but I won't bother to respond. The truth is self evident, and you guys are free to keep your head up your ass, or research this stuff if you like.
Peace.edit on 17-1-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Anttyk47
Perhaps i might be taking a big leap in saying so, but maybe Anarchy will stablize what you and most people on this fourm see as a problem. Some people believe in a killing to save a nation is Justified. Maybe it did good for overall.
Bad did good?
Anarchy=bad, could perhaps cause good?
Extreme problems need Extreme solving.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Egalitarianism has been markedly displayed in the U.S. (at least) since the end of WW2. This was the beginning of political correctness. It does society great harm to view everyone as equal, as this isn't only irrational, it's a mechanism which binds and blinds...being a belief without basis. The truth is that some are more capable than others, that some are more likely to be criminally minded, and that the social safety nets which have arisen out of egalitarian ideals have done nothing but devolve our species.
Screw fairness, or what people may perceive to be right and wrong. The highest good is to do that which is best for progression of our species. That requires the abolishment of perceived value judgments, and a hard focus on all the available data.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by Anttyk47
Perhaps i might be taking a big leap in saying so, but maybe Anarchy will stablize what you and most people on this fourm see as a problem. Some people believe in a killing to save a nation is Justified. Maybe it did good for overall.
Bad did good?
Anarchy=bad, could perhaps cause good?
Extreme problems need Extreme solving.
Sure, it is one way of solving the problem. I don't, however, believe it's the best way. Why not? Because it causes more long term suffering, and it's likely that much of our history, & cultural works will be lost in the process. It's true that much of our work has already been stored deep underground, but still...I think it's much more wise to be proactive in dealing with this situation. It seems the elite agree with this stance.
BTW, anarchy in itself isn't a bad thing. In theory, it's ideal. In reality, it would be a chaotic nightmare. Not because it can't exist alongside civilization, but because the majority are too stupid to properly self-govern. I can tell you without a doubt in my mind that in my state (Texas) , there would be many class/racial wars amongst the people if the federal and state governments were to implode.
We've tried to educate the people. They deny the lessons, generally speaking. We've tried to give out contraceptives. The stupid are much more likely not to use them. The converse is true, and the more intelligent an individual is, the more likely they are to successfully practice the use of contraceptives. It simply hasn't worked.
I honestly believe the best we can do is to encourage stupid people to become sterilized. Give them money. It's what they understand. Even if we were to offer anyone with an IQ under 90 or so 20 grand for becoming sterilized, it would likely save society untold billions in the long run. Another thing that can be done is simply remove the social safety net. It doesn't benefit our species. Let the weakest of our species perish naturally. It's what other animals do. If one of them is holding back the herd, they are pushed out. This is instinctual. Our higher instincts have actually done us great harm in modern times. It's sane and great to be supportive towards those who would benefit our species and not be a terrible burden on society. For those who cause society more damage than good, give them no support and shun them, but also don't try and cause them any harm. Just let them be. This was at one point in time, common sense. The people are demoralized now, and haven't a clue what's best for the species. Sad, but true.
Originally posted by harrytuttle
Couldn't this be the end result of students who have been going through Bush's "No Child Left Behind" education policy? These kids began school when this stuff all started, and now we are seeing the results of a memorize-test system.
Bush, the FAIL that just keeps on giving.
Originally posted by sara123123
reply to post by Brown Bear
After than long, long post of condemning everyone on the thread, you came up with the brilliant conclusion that the problem is due to inferior breeding of fat people who are producing inferior cildren with low IQ's across the fruited plain. What is the final solution you propose to solve this breeding problem we are encountering with the inferiors of society? Do you even listen to yourself?
Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by Brown Bear
Perhaps if teachers weren't held to teaching state standards of one size fits all, I would appreciate what you have stated. However, we teach what the state dictates within the time frame the state dictates. There is no room for anything else. Understand, that the state standards, at least in my state, are lowered so as every student has the opportunity to "pass". This is unfair to students and to teachers.
Originally posted by unityemissions
I've retracted my remarks to further think on things for a bit....
Apologies!!edit on 18-1-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by truthseeker1984
reply to post by Brown Bear
How does the quality of expressed writing and thinking have anything to do with teaching capability in the least? Where is the correlation?
Originally posted by ravenflt
I think some teachers overreact. 2 girls get written up because they were doing cartwheels in the hallway? This is supposed to be a school, not some military dictatorship imprisonment. I'm kind of glad that the younger generation are actually fighting the system! This is what ATS stands for isn't it?
Cheers!