It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So that's the problem in a nutshell. We need an explanation of how what they are calling "cold fusion" works. The hand warmer looks like it violates the second law, if you don't know how it works. Once you know how it works, you find that it doesn't violate any laws.
The theoretical underpinnings of cold fusion have yet to be adequately explained.
The following is a patent file for a device used for 'quantum vaccum energy extration'. The file has all the inforamtion required to build a device to absorve ambient energy ( from the univers) and powerup your house, even though it requires some serious technical skills, but all the information is here in the two files attached.
1. Quantum Vaccum Energy Extraction
/resources/uploads/files/quantumvacuumpatent.pdf
2. Conversion of the Vaccum Energy of Electromagnetic Zero Point Ocillations into Classical Mechanical Energy
/resources/uploads/files/germanscientist_free_energy.pdf
The final chapter of Bunnies Made of Cheese: The Book is currently envisioned as a look at the misuse of quantum mechanics
Originally posted by kybertech
This guy is whack.
Sorry to say it.
But first the thing: "I'll realise this into public domain but you'd have to pay me 1/3 of all the money"
which is legally impossible, either he wants to retain his copyright or not.
I stopped at the "multiplication table"
At first he baffels about the significance of the number 9 which and 'binary plus one' which is just regular trinary math. 9=3^2 27=3^3 ... big deal.
But the addition of the base 10 digits are just plain occult superstition, Alister Crowley did that too
If somebody who watched the hole thing can tell me if he does actual math in this 'lecture' I'll consider watching the rest but till then, I'll move along
Yeah if you multiply a list of prime numbers and increment always by this factor and add/substract the primes inbetween the resulting number and the last prime in the list you get a list of primes and pseudoprimes.
That is basically the hyperdimensional equivalent of his thing.edit on 15-1-2011 by kybertech because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Mary Rose
Sure is... Spun density which accounts for the platonic solids. Two other presentations that are worth researching:
As additional reference (youtube or google search terms):
Dale Pond - Keely, SVP
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Mary Rose
I was trying to figure out the answer.
It's 9.
However, I'm still unsure how that backs up his claim that "all multiples of 9 equal 9". 18 is a multiple of 9 in his example, exactly how does 18 equal 9? I was taught 18 doesn't equal 9, am I wrong? And is it even something which can be debated?
I think Rodin's claim that "all multiples of 9 equal 9" violates the ATS terms and conditions against posting incorrect, false or misleading information, and that this thread should be moved to the [HOAX] forum.
Originally posted by RainbeauBleu
18....1+8=9
Originally posted by RainbeauBleu
I heard (from an online friend who originally shared that with me) that Rodin lied about the alien abduction in order to gain attention for his mathmatics discovery.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by RainbeauBleu
I heard (from an online friend who originally shared that with me) that Rodin lied about the alien abduction in order to gain attention for his mathmatics discovery.
I'm not familiar with Rodin saying anything about an alien abduction. Do you have a link you can post?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I spent some time away from this thread, and a fresh look tells me this:
it's preposterous and stupid to even mention "vortex" in the same sentence as sudoku invented by Rodin. The existence of vortex does not follow from any of his number tricks and there is no physical manifestation of same, either.
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I spent some time away from this thread, and a fresh look tells me this:
it's preposterous and stupid to even mention "vortex" in the same sentence as sudoku invented by Rodin. The existence of vortex does not follow from any of his number tricks and there is no physical manifestation of same, either.
Don't you have some illusions to be chasing in your own line of work? That's what I thought...
Originally posted by Mary Rose
There's an article based on Bearden's research written by a person with degrees in nuclear physics and engineering science entitled "Maxwell's Equations." It states that Maxwell's original paper "A Dynamical Theory of Electromagnetic Field," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 155, 459-512 (1865) consisted of 20 equations with 20 unknowns.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I don't see how you can stand to listen to this guy
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm not sure how what he says is related to Rodin's Vortex based mathematics.