It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Vortex Based Mathematics by Marko Rodin"

page: 35
39
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Bobathon
 


That's an extremely stupid response.




posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 09:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Mary Rose
 


Got to admire your dedication to Mr Rodin but my observation of his work boils down to an obvious case of 'the snake oil is strong in this one' (apologies to George Lucas et al)

He's been pushing this miraculous device for years while all it is - is a simple toroidal coil and these things have been in common use for as long as electricity has been utilised. I've hand-wound 100s of toroids for voltage converters and chokes and those all work fine but none have cured any diseases or levitated off the bench as yet and I don't expect that will ever happen


Mr Rodin now has some competition from the guy who's pushing his 'starship' coil and he claims his design is even more miraculous than Rodin's. What I see is a horribly inefficient design with lots of wasted stray flux that shakes a magnet better than Rodin can do.

Overunity, free energy bla bla - you know the drill (or at least I do)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 09:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by 547000
 

You sound like a petulant child.


You know Mary, there was a video of Richard Feynman posted in one of your threads (either this one or Haramein's) where he describes the attitude of people like you towards physics. And in essence, what 547k said in his post is the same but admittedly with not as much finesse as Richard Feynman afforded to you:

"If you don't like this Universe, go some place else".



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose

Originally posted by Bobathon
The diaphragm is there for efficiency.


Eliminating it makes it more efficient.


I'm still wondering about what drives you to make statements for which you have absolutely no qualifications... You don't know circuit design, electrical engineering or any of science altogether. How do you know that a chunk of metal is a more efficient transducer? (Hint: it's not).

When I was about 10 years old, I connected a small electric motor, the kind they use in toys, to an audio source. It did work as a little speaker. It was indeed cool but even at age 10 I understood how these things worked and didn't consider it worthy of publishing in a newspaper. It is unfortunate that some people get stuck at this or earlier stage in their development.

edit on 22-2-2011 by buddhasystem because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 09:50 AM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 
I blame education for being biased.


edit on 22-2-2011 by Bobathon because: ...



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 10:22 AM
link   
And here's some research announcing newly-discovered magnetic fields that should be of interest to supporters of Mr Rodin. (Article of 22 Feb)
edit on 22-2-2011 by Bobathon because: ...



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bobathon
And here's some research announcing newly-discovered magnetic fields that should be of interest to supporters of Mr Rodin. (Article of 22 Feb)
edit on 22-2-2011 by Bobathon because: ...


It appears as though you conveniently side-stepped the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, our solar system being a nexus point, and perhaps our density being driven to the Milky Way as the larger derivative.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Americanist

It appears as though you conveniently side-stepped the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, our solar system being a nexus point, and perhaps our density being driven to the Milky Way as the larger derivative.
I see. That's nice. I'll take a blue one.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Bobathon
 


Thank you, that was awesome. Kind of sheds light on the issue at hand.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bobathon

Originally posted by Americanist

It appears as though you conveniently side-stepped the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, our solar system being a nexus point, and perhaps our density being driven to the Milky Way as the larger derivative.
I see. That's nice. I'll take a blue one.


GoogleBluePill.com

YouTubeBluePill.com

TheBluePill.org

WikiBluePill.org


Plenty of blue pills to wean you off the medication you're currently on... Final hope is rehab. That goes for "BS" too.





edit on 22-2-2011 by Americanist because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Americanist
 

Care to say what you're talking about, dear A?



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Bobathon
 


You went off on a tangent with a link to 'supposed' new gravitational/ magnetic forces... I provide explanation. Further details have recently emerged as:


Potential planet nicknamed Tyche may be up to 4 times the size of Jupiter

Link
edit on 22-2-2011 by Americanist because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Americanist
 



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bobathon
reply to post by Americanist
 


Point being... You don't take into account bigger ticket items. I must also reiterate fact check #1 as the weakness in your volleys:


You don't know what you don't know.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Here's a recap. I'm starting to notice you suffer from memory loss too:


www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...





edit on 22-2-2011 by Americanist because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 06:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Americanist
 
Dude, the endless personal side-swipes are just obnoxious.

I haven't a clue what you're talking about. You could try to explain, or you could just carry on blaming the people you're speaking to for your inability to communicate. I hope you'll do the former, for once.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bobathon
reply to post by Americanist
 
Dude, the endless personal side-swipes are just obnoxious.

I haven't a clue what you're talking about. You could try to explain, or you could just carry on blaming the people you're speaking to for your inability to communicate. I hope you'll do the former, for once.


You guys made it personal by attacking everyone's credibility including the OP. I'm simply taking a reasonable defensive stance...

I explain things in terms a programmer should recognize. In reference to the recent links... They're self-explanatory. You'll have to read and absorb the makings of our solar system as well as its position in the Milky Way.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Americanist
 


programmer here.

can't understand a #ing thing you're saying.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by FequalsForce
 
lol.



posted on Feb, 22 2011 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Americanist
Here's a recap. I'm starting to notice you suffer from memory loss too:


www.abovetopsecret.com...

....
-snip-


No, I don't suffer from memory loss since this link goes to your inane response to one of my posts.

You said:

Gluons? Really? You remind me of Hawking on some of his earlier book deals... What was it he said? Virtual massless particles. Yeah, that's it.


If you compare me to Hawking, I feel I'm in a good company
Unfortunately, comparison undeserved.
I can't help but quote from my glorious writings:

I challenge you to demonstrate how my theory is "vague" while it has direct connection to spectral classes of stars and even predicts the existence of black holes (the missing 8th chakra, since the black hole is in fact OUTSIDE of our Universe), while there are exactly 8 gluons forming the color field. Symmetry is of paramount importance in physics, just look up SU(3). Rodin't theory is off by one number and as such is useless. It's not 9, it's 8. Number 8 is considered lucky in Oriental cultures because the ancients could see deeply with their meditation techniques, many of which concentrated on chakras.


God, I'm better than Rodin.




top topics



 
39
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join