Some people are a little slower than you so it might take them 10 seconds for it to sink in that 27 is not equal to 9 as Rodin claims. But why it takes anybody longer than that to figure it out is a mystery to me.
Originally posted by milkyway12
Pretty sure i stated i didnt read the thread and it is very long. However, it took two seconds to confirm his theory was dead in the water. ...
You just cant simply say 27=9 because it is the only correct numbering system.
Actually, Rodin's formula is
100 = Purple.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I'm a little unclear about your disdain since casting out nines is established math; Rodin didn't make it up.
That is correct. But 9=27 is not correct, which is what Rodin claims with "all multiples of 9 equal 9".
9+9+9=27 (2+7=9)
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Nowhere in the Wiki on Casting out nines does it say anything like Rodin's claim that "all multiples of 9 equal 9". Equal has a specific meaning in mathematics.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Nowhere in the Wiki on Casting out nines does it say anything like Rodin's claim that "all multiples of 9 equal 9". Equal has a specific meaning in mathematics.
I believe we obsessed quite a bit regarding the use of the word "equals" by Rodin. I believe what we established is that his intent was to say something like "reduces to."
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Now you are in the business of interpreting of what he possibly wanted to say, right?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Meaning that you admit that the face value of his exercise is null?
and hope springs eternal that new people without a smart-ass bent will join me in exploring and understanding the document.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
"RodinAerodynamics.org featuring the Rodin Coil."
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Now you are in the business of interpreting of what he possibly wanted to say, right?
No.
It is crystal clear to anyone who is not a smart-ass detractor that casting out nines math is what he means when he uses the equal sign or says the word "equals" within the context of his Vortex Math and the coil design based on it.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Meaning that you admit that the face value of his exercise is null?
That's quite a leap on your part. Which is quite typical of your modus operandi.
These number groupings piece together into a jig-saw-like puzzle pattern that perfectly demonstrates the
way energy flows. Our base-ten decimal system is not man made, rather it is created by this flow of energy.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Electricity is the only source which God makes use of to create this Universe
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I can't find this one.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I could give you the page numbers, but that wouldn't be fun, now would it?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I found it in 2 minutes. It's not much past the beginning of the book. Sheesh.
Electricity is the only force which God makes use of to create this universe.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Electricity is the only force which God makes use of to create this universe.
There is a difference between "source" and "force."
I doubt either is correct so I'm not sure how significant the difference is, but if you really want to bring that up, "force" has a very specific meaning in physics, which refers also to gravity.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I found it in 2 minutes. It's not much past the beginning of the book. Sheesh.
I thought that you had misquoted him.
I finally found it, on page 5 under the heading “Misconception of Electro-Magnetism":
Electricity is the only force which God makes use of to create this universe.
There is a difference between "source" and "force."
Biophysical harmonics, which is the same as neurogenesis, is the secret of how to repair or regenerate areas of the brain damaged through injury or disease. In 2005, medical researchers were able to achieve regeneration of mammal organs, bones and tissue, but not of brain tissue. In his early research, Marko Rodin began exploring how sound effects the human brain, and using the biophysical harmonics of the Rodin Torus Coil to treat autism and brain damage. The foundation of understanding the human brain´s neurosynaptic connections resides in the mathematical patterns Rodin has discovered, which model how the brain – a form of a torus - wires itself.
And the 9 demonstrates the omni dimension which is the higher dimensional flux emanation called Spirit that always occurs within the center of the magnetic field lines. The last number left to be explained from The MATHEMATICAL FINGERPRINT OF GOD is the number 9. The number nine is Energy being manifested in a single moment event of occurrence in our physical world of creation. It is unique because it is the focal center by being the only number identifying with the vertical upright axis. It is the singularity or the Primal Point of Unity. The number nine never changes and is linear. For example all multiples of 9 equal 9. 9x1=9, 9x2=18, but 1+8=9, 9x3=27, but 2+7=9. This is because it is emanating in a straight line from the center of mass out of the nucleus of every atom, and from out of the singularity of a black hole. It is complete, revealing perfection, and has no parity because it always equals itself. The number nine is the missing particle in the universe known as Dark Matter.
Actually, Rodin's formula is 9=dark matter.
Which makes about as much sense, meaning none whatsoever.
Originally posted by milkyway12
I figured most of this was already discussed but it seems it wasn't ... this guy has discovered mathematical concepts already widely known ... and there is nothing special about it.
ENDORSEMENTS and PAPERS
1. RUSSELL P. BLAKE
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:16:11
Subject: The Rodin Coil
To Whom It May Concern:
Two years ago I met Marko Rodin through a mutual acquaintance. Mr. Rodin shared some of his results with me at that time. It became clear to me that Mr. Rodin's work was a synthesis of numerical patterns which had previously been overlooked by conventional science and mathematics. In hopes of bridging the gap between Mr. Rodin's discoveries and conventional science, I put forth an analytical framework in which mathematical formulae generate the numerical patterns of the Rodin Torus. These formulae suggested that the Rodin Torus lies not just on the surface of the "doughnut" shape, but into the interior as well; in other words, the Rodin Torus is three dimensional.
This mathematical formulation is as yet incomplete, and the physical meaning of these numerical phenomena remain unexplored still. Yet in my career I have several times discovered new mathematical formulations which have led to new products. In the late 1970's I discovered Atomic Modeling which revolutionized computer performance modeling, measurement, and sizing. In the early 1990's I discovered new ways to express the time-dependent behavior of program code, which led to reductions of program code size of 50% of the original size for all programs to which it was applied. I mention these facts merely to convince the reader that my intuition has a history of success in the practical application of new mathematics. . . .
We discussed him as recently as page 211 in this thread. He has a new theory of everything or something like that here:
Originally posted by milkyway12
Also, i keep Googling this Russell P. Blake guy .. nothing is showing up on him, other than Mark Rodin.
I think ATS member Aloysius the Gaul also exchanged e-mails with him where Blake also confirmed Rodin's stuff is nonsense.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I tacked down Russell Blake to an Australian firm, and have swapped a couple of emails with him. . . .
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Here is what Russell Blake said about Rodin before there was a split between the two, when Blake went his own way to pursue his ambitions, according to Rodin. This is from a 40 page .pdf file entitled "Analysis of the Rodin Coil and Its Applications (2001) by Russ Blake (PDF)" which can be clicked on at the Vortex Mathematics Gateway Portal
Analysis of the Rodin Coil and it’s Applications
Russ Blake
Introduction
I have reviewed previous and current work on the theories of Marko Rodin. Mr. Rodin has discovered a series of regularities in the decimal number system heretofore undocumented in mathematics. These patterns lay out on the surface and within the internal volume of a torus.
A number of scientists and engineers have voluntarily joined with Mr. Rodin over recent years to explore the implications of his findings.
The Rodin Coil
The Rodin Coil is a toroidal—or doughnut-shaped—form wound by wires in a pattern consistent with the number patterns discovered by Mr. Rodin. Toroidal shapes wound with wires are commonly used for inductors in electrical circuits, often for use in transformers. However the pattern of winding in a Rodin Coil is radically different from conventional toroidal coils. Experimenters have produced some samples of the Rodin Coil to measure the effects of this new approach to winding wires around a torus. . . .
Originally posted by milkyway12
Also, i keep Googling this Russell P. Blake guy .. nothing is showing up on him, other than Mark Rodin.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I got the impression he doesn't really care about Rodin - as per that email I quoted back on page 127 - he thinks he had an interesting idea or 2, but is a bit of a nut.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
It became clear to me that Mr. Rodin's work was a synthesis of numerical patterns which had previously been overlooked by conventional science and mathematics.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Mr. Rodin has discovered a series of regularities in the decimal number system heretofore undocumented in mathematics.