Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by -PLB-
Note that I can ask such a question for about every line of the text you quoted.
I'm sure that you can, but I'm also sure you're not interested anyway, except to discredit and ridicule the content.
You've made it clear on this thread that you love mainstream science and technology, do not believe that there has been suppression of technology, do
not believe that there is any conspiracy going on in the world, usually referred to as the New World Order agenda, and you're content with your
knowledge as is.
So, I don't expect any contributions from you on alternative science and technology, although I do appreciate your contribution earlier in the thread
when you pointed out Buturff's error in his video.
You are totally wrong and are operating from baseless assumption. I am in fact very much interested in alternative, non-mainstream science, as long as
it is indeed science and not fiction by people who are clearly ignoring the scientific method. I really do hope that a "fringe" scientist makes a
wonderful discovery that gives us unlimited free energy or cure many diseases. In fact, I have
witnessed certain successful medical treatments
being "suppressed", just not at all by some imaginary secret world power as you are claiming, but just by ordinary people who are either stubborn or
have invested interests in other treatment methods. It is a shame that happens, but it is just silly to generalize from such cases that this is status
quo. Actual progress happens, and on rate never seen before in history. If anything, our current "system" is the best we ever had.
The main difference between you an me is that I can discriminate between actual science and made up nonsense. Well, at least most of the time, I can
also be fooled sometimes. With you it is rather the opposite. You want
to be fooled. You require just two conditions to find a text
interesting. 1) the writer must be someone who opposes "mainstream science", and 2) the text must contain science looking words that you don't
understand. That is the only consistent criteria you have been showing throughout this thread. And it is a shame, you are not at all interested about
what is real and what is not. People pointing out and explaining that you are looking at nonsense are not wanted, you just want to believe without
opposition or putting any critical thought in it.
Like I said, I can accept that you want to believe in stuff that is easily demonstrable to be nonsense (like for example pi=3). I rather have you
don't though, as I like to see the people on this world not to be mislead by this nonsense. Just don't pretend that you are doing anything meaningful,
all you are doing is committing to dogma. You act as if you are "better" than the people criticizing the texts you come with. All you do is attacking
those people with insults, you never go into the actual contents. It is sickening. On top of that you make all kind of false assumptions about your
"opponents". Just to make it easter for you to regard those people as bad or evil.
I think that if you actually were open minded, and listened to the people who are criticizing those texts you quote found in your "research", you
could learn a great deal. Until now you have only showed how very closed minded you are.
edit on 11-3-2012 by -PLB- because: (no reason