It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
FOIA's are legal documents which can be used in court, while nothing the NY Times prints can be used in court
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
while all the NY times can do is to make things up
Originally posted by chyeaaitskristyn
So I was reading through the FOIA list last night and I decided to make a list of the North tower floors that where occupied before 1993. The list freaked me out a bit because it is so limited. Please correct me if I am wrong:
Floors
33- 1978
37- 1992
38- 1987
45- 1990
51- 1992
53- 1990
floor 76 was vacant the whole time?
79- 1988
84- 1991
85- 1991
91- 1990
102- 1990
104- 1979
108 and 109 vacant?
110- 1984
Any floor not listed was occupied after 2/1993. I find it pretty crazy that so many floors where unoccupied for such a long time. Keep in mind, this is just the North Tower.
I usually don't get into the 9/11 threads because there is a lot of controversy and the threads get nasty quick. I don't believe the OS and never did. After seeing this though I'm realizing that this plot is getting thicker and the truth wants to reveal it's head. It's only a matter of time before something comes from this.
Again, here is the link to the official list:
FOIA Request Occupancy WTC
The results were astounding. At the time of the 93 bombing, there were no tenants on any floors in the North Tower below the 33rd. Floors up through the 32nd were completely empty. We were told the towers were heavily occupied, and that evacuation was nearly impossible, when in reality, the Towers were sparsely occupied.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
The best case is Sandler Oneil and partners, who claimed to have lost 66 of their 171 employees on 911, yet never once, in the entire life of the towers held a lease according to this legal document FOIA.
Costar Group's 650 researchers track billions of square feet of commercial real estate across the United States, including the New York metropolitan area, acting as an electronic information-clearing house for the country's commercial real estate professionals.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
We receive this FOIA request back, FROM THE LANDLORDS through a LEGAL REQUEST and find Sandler Oneil and Partners never had a lease with the PANYNJ.
LAST MINUTE LEASING & STACKING OF WTC DECK
How is it possible, especially considering what happened with the world trade center, to see that all of the upper floors were leased only a few years prior to 9/11? That's an incredible expanse of time, 26 years in most case, some 28 years, where for instance floor 88 had bare floors and no tenants until 1999. The elevators in the north tower never stopped at floor 88 until mid 1999. Might I ask at this time how it is possible that any lights were ever on on floor 88 before 1999? The entire tops of these towers should have been darkened at night between the years 1972 and 1997-98.
There were no tenants. No tenants means no lights and dark floors, both during the day and at night, as lights in the WTC were visible in both daytime and night.
This has all the appearances that the companies were moved into the towers at the very end for the very purpose of 9/11. Either in reality or on paper. These towers were nearly unoccupied for their entire life, and then miraculously found a 95% occupancy heart beat on in 2001, just prior to 9/11.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
You have to be delusional.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
They need no leases!??
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
You have to be delusional.
Personal or ad-hominem attacks won't help you get your point across. It only makes you look even more foolish.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
They need no leases!??
Since you won't do it to prove your information to be accurate or false, I'll be contacting Sandler O'Neill and Partners as they have an office near me. I'll also be contacting the Port Authority as well. We'll prove this disinformation false once and for all.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
your not allowed yo just make stuff up as you go along, as it is obvious you did.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
your not allowed yo just make stuff up as you go along, as it is obvious you did.
Every single source on the entire internet shows Sandler O'Neill as being on the 104th floor of the South Tower. You are the only one on the entire internet that claims S.O. was not in the tower at all. Therefore you are the only one on the entire internet making things up about this subject.
Sorry, but you can't win this one with all other available sources proving your one single source wrong.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
your not allowed yo just make stuff up as you go along, as it is obvious you did.
Every single source on the entire internet shows Sandler O'Neill as being on the 104th floor of the South Tower. You are the only one on the entire internet that claims S.O. was not in the tower at all. Therefore you are the only one on the entire internet making things up about this subject.
Sorry, but you can't win this one with all other available sources proving your one single source wrong.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Great work Phil!
Have you looked at the occupancy directly prior to 9/11. Any companies leave just before the attack? I will definitely look closely at this document! Thanks again!!
Thanks Leo!
But you have it backwards. lol
They Twins were pretty much empty and unoccupied until 1997-1998-1999. Check out this chart we made of a cross section from the North Tower.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0e80ec98a46e.jpg[/atsimg]
World Trade Center Occupancy FOIA 1972-2001 story
Cheers-
Phil
edit on 14-1-2011 by Phil Jayhan because: Added a line of text, and link
Originally posted by Human_Alien
so the FOIA is incorrect.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
you don't believe anything that's true Bones
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Human_Alien
so the FOIA is incorrect.
No!!! It couldn't possibly be incorrect on yet another issue. That's blasphemous! H_A, don't you know that the FOIA is god's law and that there's no possible way it could be incorrect?
You're going to get outed as a liar, or at minimum told you're incorrect. Just like all other sources on the entire internet are all incorrect also. Everybody is wrong, Jayhan is right. [/sarcasm]
Makes one wonder what Jayhan's excuse is going to be after I contact S.O. Partners and the Port Authority to verify Jayhan's information and it turns out to be wrong.