It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shamanistical
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
Very odd that the story is that he went to try and join the armed forces to serve his country and was rejected from what appears to be minimal criminal offenses.
That right there should have been enough proof to have this guy locked up for being too stupid to be allowed to roam the planet Earth freely. I mean, who in their right mind would show up for a physical that you would want to pass where you just know they are going to drug test you with drugs in your system? LOL, what a total bonehead. Boneheads and idiots should be locked away for their protection and ours. In fact, if we lock up all the stupid people, we could dispense with all of those laws meant to protect us from stupid people (i.e. handgun ownership wouldn't be a problem, etc.).
Originally posted by Shamanistical
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
Very odd that the story is that he went to try and join the armed forces to serve his country and was rejected from what appears to be minimal criminal offenses.
Boneheads and idiots should be locked away for their protection and ours. In fact, if we lock up all the stupid people, we could dispense with all of those laws meant to protect us from stupid people
Originally posted by Lovinlife
I think it's hilarious how people can have zero confidence in the testimony and the eye witness accounts of people,
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Until Proven Guilty!
I was not there, so I cannot possibly know.
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
reply to post by Lovinlife
The president asks people to call upon there humility and to empathize, some people do that by accusing concerned citizens of using such behavior as a mental invalid like JLL.
Listen, if Obama hadn't made such a circus out of this in response to media activation. I wouldn't be here with something to say about it, so thank them.
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
Originally posted by Lovinlife
I think it's hilarious how people can have zero confidence in the testimony and the eye witness accounts of people,
Very few if any may actually question the violent scene these people witnessed. The purpose being that most people will latch onto the hard evidence such as forensics and witnesses and that will be enough to condemn JLL. And alot of people will swallow the hook line and sinker on inconsistencies with religion as well. Or refuse to accept facts about where we really came from. The education system has failed to create people who actually think(just look at the numbers, or are they lying too).
Would most people really prefer to just execute this crazy, flag burning, mentally unstable, reclusive, atheists in an act of pure revenge. Doesn't seem that righteous....
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Lovinlife
Yep.. I was blown away when I saw that there were 40 flags.
Now look at it. It is by definition a troll thread too because it baits you in with a misleading partial headline.
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
reply to post by Lovinlife
Like I said, I didn't even know about this tragedy until the President invaded my living room by taking over the media. And his message was mostly biblical which I'm sure you liked("thank heavens"). Maybe I've just never seen him use such evangelism. And it would seem that he did it at a point in which his public opinion was in the crapper.
Several mentions of congress and constituents.... I guess the people who die violently in my neighborhood just aren't as important as these bureaucrats.
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
according to Time, the drug test was clear though JLL admitted to using cannabis frequently hence rejection from army.
Originally posted by Lovinlife
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
reply to post by Lovinlife
You're right, they're not as important. Their impact on other peoples' lives (freedoms, ways of life, expenses/finances) have no where near the impact as the congresswoman's..
Originally posted by Shamanistical
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
according to Time, the drug test was clear though JLL admitted to using cannabis frequently hence rejection from army.
They didn't reject him because he had smoked the stuff before, they rejected him for being too stupid to answer the question correctly, lol. That's how a lot of people mess up their lives, by not knowing how to correctly answer a simple question.
Originally posted by WhiteDevil013
Originally posted by drew1749
Honestly, they have him on charges that he doesn't need a trial for.
Attacking someone from Congress is a huge crime...not to mention the other people who died.
A judge and a kid to name just a few...this isn't some game that we can play the blame game with.
Terrorists shouldn't get trials IMHO.
But that's just my opinion, I'm sure you guys have a different one...and that's all good.
I kind of agree. Even though its completely un american and all......
When I let my emotions get the best of me, I like to think how it would be so much more efficient to just put him on a wall, and let the victims, or their families, (the parents of the little girl) come unload a 30 round clip on his face.
Note: Im not sadistic, nor do I fantasize about violent acts towards any innocent living thing, nor do I think an eye for an eye gives anyone the right to shoot someone.edit on 13-1-2011 by WhiteDevil013 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
Originally posted by Lovinlife
Originally posted by SocratesPupil
reply to post by Lovinlife
Is he as important as the congresswoman as well. For all you know this congresswoman could have eventually been responsible for legalizing something that was not in the communities best interest, but rather the interests of some corporation that backs her financially or some bs lobbyists. JLL took away these peoples freedoms by taking there lives, changed the ways of life for the families and likely the community, and created the opportunity for the media to exploit economically.
I am not defending JLL. Rather I am questioning the way that he went undiagnosed despite so many red flags and his interaction with military recruiters. Add a satanic alter and a flag burning video with some social awkwardness and a side of reclusive nature and what do you get? A guy that hardly anyone will miss and the media will have a blast with. If a person had evil in there heart and was a social elitists with the ability and means to carry this out, they really couldn't plan it better.
I don't think all the facts about JLL will see the light of day because of the gravity that the media as well as the president has attached to it. I think that with a more people oriented system this could have been avoided and JLL(who can't be far from being mentally handicapped) could have potentially contributed positively to society.
When are people going to start thinking about avoidance rather than response.
Uh, you just defended him. And yes, he is as important now, but not legitimately. The day he is elected, publically and according to law then he will achieve that legitimacy. Until then, I think it's logical to say that because the Congresswoman was legitimately elected (maybe you'll say we don't know the definition of "legitimate," because of your paranoia, which I won't argue with), then her impact was less likely to be negative (just going on my optimistic instinct here, sorry).
So you think it's up to the military recruiters to flag this individual for mental instability then. Well, the U.S. government is sorry it doesn't have that level of connectivity and communication down pact yet. I'm sure that as soon as it does, then you'll decry it as an impingement on your freedoms, and I'd likely agree with you.
I don't think that I've implied in any way that I know a lot of people, though according to my own take on that phrase, I feel that I do. That being said, your "what if" scenario could be applied to any and all circumstances involving any and all people, it's an invalid argument. Was there any indication that she was about to "legalize" something that would have a negative affect? You should probably do some research before making assumptions. At least my assumptions are based on the eye witness accounts of dozens of people...
The bottom line to my argument is that to believe that JLL is guilty is not an unreasonable belief, and my argument is not invalid...