It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Marulo
However, these claims that we are all noticing, the claim that vitriolic and inflammatory language will lead to violence, are not unfounded.
www.washingtonpost.com...
Both sides, to some degree, are responsible. Unfortunately, the right clearly uses vitriolic language far more often.
Are you serious? Did you not see any of the posts by flyersfan showing picture after picture after picture of people advocating cutting off Bush's head or lynching him? Did you also not see my thread quoting a democrat congressman saying that the Republican candidate for Florida governor needs to be put up against a wall and shot? Or the thread showing democrat campaign literature using bullseyes and talking about "targeted Republicans"?
You also seem to be saying, "Never mind the facts in evidence. I'm still going with what has been dis-proven for the reasons behind the shooting because I want to place the blame elsewhere."
What is with people that keep wanting to claim things like it is society (or the gun) that kills people and not the individual that pulls the trigger. That it is the pen (or computer) that mis-spells words and not the writer, etc.?
When is a person finally held responsible for their own actions?
Originally posted by Marulo
We don't really know. We don't really know anything, if you really want to get into that sort of logic.
I think it is safe to say that people have indeed been shot, considering the University of Phoenix Medical Center has given several press reports on the status of the surgeries of the injured victims.edit on 12-1-2011 by Marulo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Marulo
Edit: I realized I might give the impression that I don't think Jared Lee Loughner should be held responsible. He pulled the trigger, he should be held accountable for his actions.
Originally posted by Marulo
reply to post by SeesFar
You know very well any of us can provide blogs with grossly misleading images from both political parties.
I made a mistake in claiming the right used more vitriolic language. Perhaps that is not the issue. The issue is the intent of the vitriolic language. At this point, everything becomes speculation.
The intent of the vitriolic language obviously varies from person to person.
In my opinion, Sarah Palin is an idiot. In fact I honestly believe the world would be a better place if she had not been chosen as John McCain's candidate back in 2008. She seems to be wholly ignorant on international matters, particularly concerning South America and the Middle East. I find her mannerisms to be quite embarrassing for our already # covered image as a country. As long as we are talking about how the third world views us, which is the majority of the world population.
This woman does not deserve to die, yet. She should however be ostracized by society to the point where she can no longer polarize this country.
I absolutely hate to judge people I do not know, but we both know it can't be helped that easily.
This is indeed an incredibly complicated issue. We have both sides fueling an increasingly inflammatory debate over politics. Both sides seem to contradict themselves on a daily basis.
Are we against vitriolic language? Or is it alright in certain circumstances?
It seems many of us, including myself, condemn vitriolic language and turn around and use it ourselves because it is in line with our ideologies.
At any rate, I did not choose my words that carefully in the previous post.
Sorry if this does not flow very well. I am trying to articulate my ideas as they are changing.
Finally. I was open to vitriolic language in certain circumstances. But I realize now that that is not the answer.
Fighting violence with violence is never the answer. In this case fighting vitriolic rhetoric with vitriolic rhetoric.
Originally posted by Marulo
Though i do not necessarily align myself with the Right, i do believe your statement to be very incorrect. It is the media and certain others that would project the misdeeds of the Left onto the Right.
Originally posted by Marulo
reply to post by SeesFar
This is just to humor myself and you.
Not doing sufficient research and then publicly stating your conclusions is not a mistake?
That is a grave mistake.
I have a feeling both of us are misinterpreting each other.
Important: I did not read your entire post, I am on my way out the door.edit on 12-1-2011 by Marulo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Faiol
LOL
in the internet he cant read anything, he cant know whats happening around the world right
god, this thread is a total fail!!
Originally posted by whatukno
In this day and age you pretty much have to live under a rock to not have some idea what's going on in the world around you.
And for such a loner, this guy seems to have had a lot of friends who had intimate knowledge of his political habits.
Originally posted by centurion1211
My point in posting this thread was simply that there is NO EVIDENCE that the shooter was motivated by things from Palin - OR ANYONE ELSE.]
Originally posted by centurion1211
There you have it. The shooter didn't even watch the news. So, he couldn't have been influenced to do the shooting by something Palin, Limbaugh or anyone else said.
Will this be enough to get liberal members here, the MSM and democrat politicians to back down from their cynical and self-serving rhetoric?
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by centurion1211
We simply don't have enough evidence from the shooting, sure, we can rely on FOX News for information which has been on a "Don't blame US!" campaign ever since this happened.
I find it interesting that for two years now, the right has had a free for all, threatening lawmakers, (either directly, or indirectly), and when an event occurs that fits the narrative of those threats, these same people want to shift blame away from themselves. Creating a narrative of, "Oh we have been peace loving non hate filled innocents that could never have precipitated events like this."
I thought that taking personal responsibility was a hallmark of this conservative movement. Apparently I was wrong in that line of thinking.
I believe that if the truth is actually disclosed, we will find out that these "Friends" of the shooters who have come forward to say that his actions were in no way politically motivated will evaporate and this was indeed a politically motivated tragedy.
I am not buying the "Don't blame US!" story.