It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by willie9696
Doesn't anyone else find it a little fishy that within 24 hrs of the early rising of the sun(by 2 days), that we now have different astrological signs? Something is amiss I would say. Yes I heard years ago that the astrological signs were out by a month or so, so why disclosure now? Sounds like they're trying to keep people from either freaking out or asking questions. But the MSM has picked this up so I'm guessing TPTB want everyone to know about it so it can't be good.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
You're right. They're making this a very smooth brain-numbing transition alright. They added this sign and people are just accepting it without consideration or implication.
Actually the earth's axis of rotation isn't what I was referring to. What strikes me as odd is the timing of the astrological "disclosure". Although we know and have known for years the signs are off(I remember hearing about this over 20 years ago), the question I have is doesn't it seem a little suspect that this information has gone mainstream just within a day or so of the early rising of the sun. It would be interesting to know if we could tell if the earth was moving faster through it's orbital plane. Maybe the early rising of the sun could be explained if we are actually moving faster and we are in fact a cpl days ahead of what the calendar says. Just a theory , but I think this may have started on the winter solstice of 2010. The bible does speak of a shortening of days in the end times. What if its not the 24 day that gets shorter but the year in fact gets shorter?
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by willie9696
Doesn't anyone else find it a little fishy that within 24 hrs of the early rising of the sun(by 2 days), that we now have different astrological signs?
No. Astrologers don't account for precession, astronomers do. If you account for precession you find that the earth's axis of rotation is exactly where it should be.
Originally posted by willie9696
Actually the earth's axis of rotation isn't what I was referring to. What strikes me as odd is the timing of the astrological "disclosure". Although we know and have known for years the signs are off(I remember hearing about this over 20 years ago), the question I have is doesn't it seem a little suspect that this information has gone mainstream just within a day or so of the early rising of the sun.
It would be interesting to know if we could tell if the earth was moving faster through it's orbital plane.
Well that may not be the case right now seeing as this is probably just the beginning of the process, and I don't think much would be out of wack yet, or at least noticeable. We will have to keep our eyes on the sky and see what happens. Interesting times indeed.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by willie9696
Actually the earth's axis of rotation isn't what I was referring to. What strikes me as odd is the timing of the astrological "disclosure". Although we know and have known for years the signs are off(I remember hearing about this over 20 years ago), the question I have is doesn't it seem a little suspect that this information has gone mainstream just within a day or so of the early rising of the sun.
I don't find it any more or any less suspect than me happening to generate data on the rotational axis showing it to be where it should be just days before the report of the early rising of the sun. A funny coincidence, but really it could have just as easily have happened shortly before or after the inuit stories hit the media (which caused me to start generating ideas on how to directly test the claim that the earth is tilting) or when the story about excess light in northern canada hit the media.
It would be interesting to know if we could tell if the earth was moving faster through it's orbital plane.
If that were the case we'd easily be able to tell by the fact that the other planets and asteroids in our solar system wouldn't be where they're supposed to be in the night sky.edit on 14-1-2011 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by willie9696
Well that may not be the case right now seeing as this is probably just the beginning of the process, and I don't think much would be out of wack yet, or at least noticeable. We will have to keep our eyes on the sky and see what happens. Interesting times indeed.
You're right of course if the other haven't increased their velocity as well. Not saying they have but other planets seem to be experiencing things that we are here on earth. Would it possible for everything to be accelerating and we wouldn't notice if everything else did the same? I would assume that earth is not affected by itself, the other planets would be affected as well. Just a theory, but something ain't right.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by willie9696
Well that may not be the case right now seeing as this is probably just the beginning of the process, and I don't think much would be out of wack yet, or at least noticeable. We will have to keep our eyes on the sky and see what happens. Interesting times indeed.
Please explain how the sun could be out of position by two day's worth of motion along the ecliptic because we're too far along in our orbit by that much, but yet we wouldn't be able to tell based on our motion relative to the other planets or asteroids? For instance, Jupiter's coordinates for midnight UTC yesterday were 23h 55m 14.99s -01d 50' 55.7". 48 hours later its coordinates should be 23h 56m 26.61s -01d 42' 44.4". That's more than 8 arcminutes of a difference, which is easily noticeable telescopically and is mostly due to our motion in orbit since Jupiter orbits the sun at a much slower velocity than we do.
Originally posted by willie9696
You're right of course if the other haven't increased their velocity as well. Not saying they have but other planets seem to be experiencing things that we are here on earth. Would it possible for everything to be accelerating and we wouldn't notice if everything else did the same?
Originally posted by sechmet
reply to post by ngchunter
Would you like to check it right now ?
Just in case if anything maybe changed within this one week ?
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by sechmet
We have some "shift" in the Earth's rotation angle, thats the probably reason.
Isn't it impressive?
*snip*
Therefore the star should have been 294.2 arcseconds from the north celestial pole.
My camera and telescope combination produce an angular resolution of 1.88 arcseconds per pixel when the images are scaled down to 1024 resolution:
flickr.com...
I measured USNO-A2 1725-00691811 to be 156.9 pixels from the NCP in the image I took that night:
i319.photobucket.com...
The original image is here:
i319.photobucket.com...
That corresponds to a distance of 294.972 arcseconds from the NCP, less than an arcsecond from the expected value and well within the resolution of the image itself (in other words, no change in our tilt was detected). An arcsecond, by the way, is 1/3,600th of a degree.edit on 14-1-2011 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SonOfTheLawOfOne
294.2 was your expected value. You arrived at 294.972. That is a difference of .772, which is pretty close to a full arcsecond, so a little less than 1/3600th of a degree.... that's still a difference, is it not?
My question is this - is your equipment not sensitive enough to get to that degree of precision?
Originally posted by AeonStorm
Just to put this into some perspective Alaska's longest night lasts 67 days. If there is a change of two days then that is a change of (2/67=0.0299) .0299% .
If this happened on the equator where the night lasts about 12 hours then that would equate to a change of (0.0299x12hr) 0.358hr's or 21 minutes. So the sun would rise 21 minutes early (on the equator). (I believe all the math and numbers are right. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.)
hrmm. The lowering of the horizon could account for that. but it does seem to be a massive change.
SnFedit on 13-1-2011 by AeonStorm because: Addidtional Infoedit on 13-1-2011 by AeonStorm because: ^^