Plus degrees in December (Polar night ends TWO DAYS early? ), page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 92 times
Topic started on 12-1-2011 @ 09:14 AM by Human_Alien
(Mods, although this is Breaking News, I needed to translate it and not being positive on its translation, I didn't want to chance mis-quoting anything. So if you need to please move to Breaking News section)




So, what do we have here? The Sun rising two days EARLIER and that is due to global warming (too)?
I am no expert or even a B student when it comes to science but I cannot for the life of me, incorporate let alone understand the Sun's movement on Earth and.................the weather.

Sure I realize we can have optical illusions but come on.....two places on the global (Arctic and Greenland) are experiencing Sun light when it's not supposed to?

And global warming? That cliche has gotten a LOT of bang for its buck! Gore should be proud. But needless to say, that's another area of contention. I thought we are in a mini-ice-age?
So what gives?
Ya think they confused the masses pretty well? I'd rate this a stellar performance by the PTB who want to keep us scratching our heads!



In Greenland, the sun after the polar night of this year has risen by two days early. According to the KNR Radio Greenland showed the central star in Ilulissat, on Tuesday at exactly 12:56:57 Clock. Normally, the sun rises in the West Greenland settlement, however, until 13 First time in January again.

An expert from the University of Vienna suggests that the observation may be due to the recent strong accelerated melting of the Greenland ice sheet. One thing is certain - the constellation of the stars has certainly changed.
The Greenlandic town IlulissatAP / Michael KappelerIlulissat is located in West Greenland and living from fishing and tourism.

Inhabitants of the third-largest city with 4,500 inhabitants of Greenland, made because of the early sun appeared worried. "Here in the place the sun comes up until 13 January. Since one or the other probably does not, "cited a 74-year-old KNR locals in a report on its website.
No change in the Earth's rotation

Scientists rule out any case that the observation could have geophysical or astronomical reasons. "In the constellation of the stars has not changed," said Wolfgang Lenhardt, head of the geophysics department at the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna. "There would have been an outcry around the world." The data of Earth's axis and Earth's rotation would be monitored continuously and meticulously.
Horizon decreases

translate.google.com...|en&tbb=1&ie=UTF-8
news.orf.at...

Then we had the report of light shining in High Arctic during their 24-hour period of darkness. And that TOO is being blamed on global warming.


People in the High Arctic say their 24-hour darkness isn't as dark as it used to be, and a weather researcher says it's because of the warming climate.

"We still have a daylight and there's still blue, green, red down there — there's sun sign still," said Zipporah Ootooq Aronsen, who lives in Resolute Bay, Nunavut. "It's not usually like that."

People in Resolute Bay now sometimes see a distant island that in the past was only visible during daylight hours.

Read more: www.cbc.ca...#ixzz1ApjWUhwB

Really now.


edit on 12-1-2011 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-1-2011 by Human_Alien because: grammar and quote
edit on 19/1/2011 by Sauron because: removed eleven unnecessary question marks from title



reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 09:36 AM by auxxon
reply to post by Human_Alien


I think it would be more appropriate to try linking this to climate change instead of global warming (which, IMO, is absolute rubbish).



reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 09:39 AM by Human_Alien
Originally posted by auxxon
reply to post by Human_Alien


I think it would be more appropriate to try linking this to climate change instead of global warming (which, IMO, is absolute rubbish).


I personally think this should be duplicated and inserted in many topic threads. Besides, I don't know how to switch. I think that's up to a Mod at this point but I did alert them.

What is your position? You think Global warming is rubbish or the article itself (or my expressed opinion)?

Thanks


PS I don't think I added enough question marks
edit on 12-1-2011 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 09:44 AM by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Human_Alien


my opnion , thy hasnt the entire world noticed this too ?

unless its :

1 a hoax
2 an observational error / error in the tables
3 greenland has moved - relative to other land masses


reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 09:51 AM by Human_Alien
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Human_Alien


my opnion , thy hasnt the entire world noticed this too ?

unless its :

1 a hoax
2 an observational error / error in the tables
3 greenland has moved - relative to other land masses


People have been saying the Sun's position is off only it's not being announced on the Official "We'll Tell You What's What' website

I thought about Greenland possibly moving. That would be horrific but that would at least help explain it. But what about the Arctic then?

I haven't studied the Sun's position every day for the past 50 years to know where it's supposed to be so it could be an entire 25-degrees off and I wouldn't know it.
It rises before I get up and sets around 6PM right now in Florida. But I don't know exactly where it should be in our skies. Do you? I am not making fun at you, I'm just asking does the average person REALLY pay attention? I doubt it.

Now the argument will be, why isn't anyone saying so?
And to that I'll ask, 'like who"??
NASA?

I am not saying the Earth has officially tilted but putting aside all these unofficial reports we have the ancient prophecies subscribing to a physical pole shift too which we need not dismiss so quickly at these very confusing times here on Earth.


reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 09:57 AM by auxxon
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by auxxon
reply to post by Human_Alien


I think it would be more appropriate to try linking this to climate change instead of global warming (which, IMO, is absolute rubbish).


I personally think this should be duplicated and inserted in many topic threads. Besides, I don't know how to switch. I think that's up to a Mod at this point but I did alert them.

What is your position? You think Global warming is rubbish or the article itself (or my expressed opinion)?

Thanks


PS I don't think I added enough question marks
edit on 12-1-2011 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



lol....no, I don't think the article is rubbish, just the term 'Global Warming', and all it's associated propaganda. Climate Change, on the other hand, I think is more relevant as not everywhere is getting 'warmer', but weather patterns all over the world seem to be changing (some places getting warmer, some wetter, some colder). It's affecting everyone. Just take a look at the recent flooding in Oz, and the 'freak' cold weather across Europe as examples.


reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 10:05 AM by OneisOne
reply to post by Human_Alien


We are good. I just posted the info about the horizon lowering per the article.

My opinion? If the ice sheet has melted (big if) that much to make the sun appear to raise 2 days early, I would hope that someone noticed that. The melting part, that would be a huge difference! I think there is something going on with our little planet. What it is, I don't know.

Thank you for this thread, never would have known about it otherwise.



reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 10:17 AM by tarifa37
Originally posted by Chadwickus
I think there is a problem with the translation.

The sun can't rise 2 days earlier, since it's already been rising every morning anyway.

Here's a link to sunrise/sunset times for Greenland, as you can see the sun has been rising at about 10 am all month:

Link

Perhaps it was meant to be 2 minutes earlier, which would make sense due to the mild weather Greenland had last year and has melted the ice, lowering the horizon.

www.icenews.is...


They are in darkness for most of the winter and the return of the sun has come two days early, That's how I understand it. Correct me if I'm wrong certainly wouldn't be the first time.


reply posted on 12-1-2011 @ 10:43 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by tarifa37


Seems you're correct, I got the wrong city.

www.timeanddate.com...

The sun is 2 days early.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 3 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags