This is based on the preface that he was a mind control victim (MK-Ultra or the like) and was being very meta about it in the first part of the poem.
It is, I believe, significant that the 9 yr old girl was born on 9/11/01 and Loughner was born 9/10/88, 13 years and 1 day apart (13+1) It is written
both from the perspective of a poet and poetic interpretation as well as from an esoteric/symbolic conspiracy minded point of view. My comments are
[bracketed], the rest is merely an interpretation of his words not an advocacy for any particular course of action.
1 If there's no flag in the constitution then the flag in the film is unknown.
If what we think of as an honorable government is not, patriotic sentiment is misdirected. The flag in the constitution seems to be the symbol for a
true constitutional government [such as the kind advocated by Ron Paul.] As opposed to the “false-flag” government currently in place that is
absent a real constitution [which got taken away by the PATRIOT act.] The film, as implied by line 6, is the world in front of our eyes. Its
description as a film indicates a detachment but involvement in the “film”, such as sitting in a theater-both a description of mainstream America
zoned out and a meta description of himself watching himself go through the programmed motions. Also the use of film implies illusion-the film on the
screen is a far different creature than the one in front of the directors chair. We don't really know the government like we think we do.
2 There's no flag in the constitution.
It is not an honorable government [what with the Illuminati and Manchurian candidate mind-control and all]
3 Therefore, the flag in the film is unknown.
Therefore we don't really know the government like we think we do
4 Burn every new and old flag that you see.
This has its correlate in “If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him.” In other words, let go of your attachments to either past beliefs or
beliefs you may develop in the future about what flag you have been worshiping, Don't let your beliefs of what you think the government has been get
in the way of seeing what it really is. Get rid of the false-flag. Burning every one you see seems to suggest three things, first, it could be a call
to wake people up to the truth of the false-flag. It also seems to indicate the sentiment, “don't believe your eyes” in regard to this film you
are watching. Don't believe the official story of anything in the media [be it regarding the true details behind the Tuscon shooting or what really
happened on 9/11-I told you those birthdays are significant.] Finally, it could be telling us that we need to root out all of the corruption in the
system before we can have line 9's new government..
5 Burn your flag!
Get rid of the attachments and beliefs you have around this concept of “flag” as used in this interpretation. Burn your preconceptions. The first
use of an exclamation point, making this course of action more of a demand than a request, as was the gentler phrased line 4.
6 I bet you can imagine this in your mind with a faster speed.
Our minds eye grasps this sense of change faster than it will play out in the world in front of our physical eyes. [Everywhere people are awakening to
the fact that there is something going on behind the scenes and this change is quickening,] A call to the emphasized action of line 7.
7 Watch this protest in reverse!
This is again phrased as a demand following the softer sentence of line 6. It's correlate is “build it and they will come.” See the false-flag
government as overturned already. Envision a return to constitutional government as opposed to the big brother false-flag government, as supported by
lines 9-11 [coincidence?] In a spiritual sense, matter/action follows thought, this is the basis for the law of attraction. He is telling us that
after we have burned our flags and have seen what happens behind the scenes that we have to skip to the end of the movie, where there is line 9's
“new government.” Presumably one in which the flag is in the constitution. From holding the vision of the end of the movie that ending can be
8 Ask the local police; "What's your illegal activity on duty?".
This seems to be a call to direct protest but is more subtle and layered., like the rest of this. On one level that's exactly what it is, again
supported by lines 9-11. But, if it is an illegal government then the very act of enforcing that governments laws is itself an illegal activity, as
would carry over to soldiers and military actions. But, the fact that he uses the word local and singles out the individual in line 5 suggests that
the change has to start at the local/individual level. On another level it highlights the corruption in the system where even protect and serve police
are corrupt. Asking the police person [or Ted Stevens or Tom Delay or Charles Rangel or the Keating Five or Larry Craig or...] “what law did you
9 If you protest the government then there's a new government from protesting.
If you actually do something about it then you'd have something to show for it and you would see change in your government
10 There's not a new government from protesting.
False flags continue, people continue to be mind controlled assassins, gropings continue at the airports, corporations and bankers still call the
shots. The status quo continues.
11 Thus, you aren't protesting the government.
This, like lines 5 and 8 is an individualization of the message and a tell it like it is statement. It's correlate would be “Be the change you
seek.” If the false-flag government continues as line 10 clearly shows it does, then we are complicit in its continuance and are allowing it to
happen, not doing all we can to create the change that he demands in line 7 that we envision as the end of the film. Unfortunately, under the
influence of mind control or just crazy, what he did in protest was tragic, which I think he acknowledges with some detached regret in line 12.
12 There's something important in this video: There's no communication to anyone in this location.
He is very clearly saying that no one is home. Elvis has left the building. Whoever Loughner was at one point was no longer present. In other words,
his core personality has been hollowed out. This is the most meta-mind-control line of this whole first segment. The fact that he emphasizes that this
is of importance is almost a plea, were it not so detached, to see what had been done to him, as that kind of mind-control policy is symptomatic of
the false-flag government that creates assassins while mainstream America salutes the Flag, says the Pledge of Allegiance and God Bless the Red,
White, and Blue (colors that are featured in his new bird of the second segment)
From a line numbering perspective, the colon splits it in 2, creating 13 lines of the poem. The numerology of the shooting is another aspect not only
represented in the 9/11 connection in the birthdays and in this communique (really, what are the chances that the Faces of Hope girl would get shot?)
but right through to the ages of the 6 that died, all occult numbers:9, 30, 76 (7+6=13), 79 (reduces down to 7, also 9 is an inverted 6), 76 (another
13), and 63(6+3=9). Then there is the number of wounded: 13 (wounded in the attack)+1 (wounded by shrapnel) or 13 innocent bystanders+1 (Giffords)
that gets non-stop press attention as the focus of the attack. The date 1/8/2011 is a 13 day (1+8+2+1+1=13) The only reports I can find say it
happened shortly after 10am, I suspect it was 10:03 (13 separated by 0:0.) Christina's memorial was held on 1/11/11 (a 7 day, 119 (911 inverted) days
into her 10th year) and her funeral was on 1/13/11 (a 9 day). Loughner was 120 (1+2=3) days into his 23rd year (otherwise known as 22.) An overall
crowd of 20-30 people was reported. He fired 15 to 20 shots from a 9mm with a 30 round magazine. The same numbers over and over again, The fact that
there are 13 lines of this first segment (13+1) and 13 stripes in the flag featured in lines 1-5 as presumably he was talking about the American flag
(he is after all an American citizen) begs coincidence to sit down.
This took longer than expected so you will have to wait for part 2 which is much more densely packed with symbolism (10 lines, 13+10, or 13+1, a poem
in 2 segments.) Until then, Controldiction is pretty close in the interpretation of part 2 and it dovetails nicely with my interpretation of part 1
but is off in terms of it's depth. NuclearPaul hit it right on the money with his Horus/CIA Emblem comparison. Serpent of Arabia echoes the above with
“be the change you want” JesseJamesXX hit on something with the Baphomet and the Eye. Abductee001's later work with the anagrams are
interesting.And, thanks to Rushunt for drawing attention to the 333 and 99 as well as -45 degrees (4+5=9 and – indicates a number inversion-using
the negative aspects of the number) to go along with the other number correlations.
edit on 15-1-2011 by coyotepoet because: (no reason
edit on 15-1-2011 by coyotepoet because: cleaning