posted on Jan, 15 2011 @ 06:29 PM
reply to post by MrXYZ
Do you mean that literally?
Or are you just saying that OP's theory is so unsupported as to be considered fictional? I'm hoping it's the
latter, because if OP has ever come right out and said that this was all just a bit of fun on their part I will be disappointed - to say the least -
I was hoping that, since they profess to believe the theory or at least believe it's possible, OP would discuss or refute the lack of evidence (that
I can see at least) for Soros having been adopted by the Rothschilds that I have now posted twice about (in response to their
request that I
read another thread and search for transcripts which they said, combined, would demonstrate that he was in fact adopted/raised by the Rothschilds)
without response. I'm not trying to argue with anyone or "win" or anything. That doesn't enter into it. I just like to discuss things fully, to
their conclusion, based on the available evidence so that we can all establish the truth - whatever that may be - in a careful and thorough way.
Isn't that why we're on ATS? Not to argue and win or lose debates?
The trend of posting in threads on ATS with evidence potentially confronting a theory and then receiving no reply after going to the trouble of
actually searching for it is becoming frustrating and disappointing.
I thought it was against the T&C to post knowingly fictional information
anywhere other than one (possibly two depending on how you look at it) boards here. So I have to assume, since I don't want to indict anyone without
proof, that OP was sincere in his or her belief at least when they created this thread.
So with that said, I would like to respectfully and politely request a reply regarding the lack of evidence that Soros was ever adopted or raised by
the Rothschilds. (Or a refutation of it proving that he was.) Just not replying after so many pages, assertions, stars, and flags is disappointing to
me. I haven't asserted any facts, but rather, have simply stated that I can find no proof of the cardinal claim made in this thread; that Soros is
part of the Merovingian bloodline by virtue of having been raised/adopted by the Rothschilds. I think after making this thread, that should at least