It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
And armed insurrection is not treasonous. It is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. How can it be treasonous when it was written into our Constitution?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Lilitu
First, to be fair and honest, the vitriolic hate speech really began with the liberals when they wanted Bush dead. It was everywhere. It is what made me defend Bush. Not because i liked him, but because the hate was so strong as to make me ill. It is funny how the liberal news shows completely miss that point, and take the opportunity to disgustingly politicize this as a "right wing" issue. As Modern Academia said, they are blaming an ideology that the shooter had nothing to do with.
And armed insurrection is not treasonous. It is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. How can it be treasonous when it was written into our Constitution?
Perhaps your misunderstanding of the two above realities could indicate a need to rethink?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Lilitu
First, to be fair and honest, the vitriolic hate speech really began with the liberals when they wanted Bush dead.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
It is funny how the liberal news shows completely miss that point, and take the opportunity to disgustingly politicize this as a "right wing" issue.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
And armed insurrection is not treasonous. It is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. How can it be treasonous when it was written into our Constitution?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Janky Red
Well, that would be the difference between one nutjob vs a militia of a million citizens, you know?
I am not a violent person, either. But our founding fathers were very clear as to why the 2nd Amendment was placed there, whether you find it palatable or not.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Lilitu
First, to be fair and honest, the vitriolic hate speech really began with the liberals when they wanted Bush dead. It was everywhere. It is what made me defend Bush.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Hey, you said the left is JUST AS GUILTY so I wanted to see if you were just saying things that make you feel nice or if that was based in reality at all.
Originally posted by Jenna
You do realize that senators and representatives from both sides of the aisle get death threats and that articles can be found to show that the left is also guilty of vandalism, yes?
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
I remember it beginning in earnest during the Clinton years. I might be older than you.
Originally posted by Jenna
Nope, nowhere in there did I say "just as guilty", "more guilty", "less guilty", or whatever variation you prefer in your failed attempt to put words in my mouth. Read my post again and perhaps next time you could use your reading skills first so as to avoid embarrassing situations where you assume someone said something they didn't. You are the one trying to put numbers on it here as if that somehow makes one side better than the other, not I.
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by kinda kurious
You do realize that senators and representatives from both sides of the aisle get death threats and that articles can be found to show that the left is also guilty of vandalism, yes?
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Sinnthia
*sigh*
Reading skills aren't a strong suit I see.. I can't really rephrase it to make it any simpler. Both sides do it. Both sides receive death threats. Both sides commit vandalism. It doesn't matter who's is bigger, it happens to both Democrats and Republicans. I didn't make any claims as to who gets more death threats or who commits more acts of vandalism. And for the life of me I cannot comprehend how what I've said three times now is so difficult for you to understand.
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by kinda kurious
You do realize that senators and representatives from both sides of the aisle get death threats and that articles can be found to show that the left is also guilty of vandalism, yes?
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Hey, you said the left is JUST AS GUILTY so I wanted to see if you were just saying things that make you feel nice or if that was based in reality at all.
Originally posted by Jenna
You do realize that senators and representatives from both sides of the aisle get death threats and that articles can be found to show that the left is also guilty of vandalism, yes?
Nope, nowhere in there did I say "just as guilty", "more guilty", "less guilty", or whatever variation you prefer in your failed attempt to put words in my mouth. Read my post again and perhaps next time you could use your reading skills first so as to avoid embarrassing situations where you assume someone said something they didn't. You are the one trying to put numbers on it here as if that somehow makes one side better than the other, not I.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
The second liberalism or conservatism is introduced into the language instantly errodes and erases all credibility of the poster.edit on 12-1-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jenna
And no Sinnthia, my point was not to point out that it happens in equal levels. I don't know if it does or not because I've never cared enough to count them up. My point was exactly what I've said it was so many times I'm not repeating it again.edit on 1/12/2011 by Jenna because: (no reason given)