It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Well your not really giving me any respect if your irresponsible enough to mention its ok to give adolescent kids a gun so they can learn how to shoot. A gun is not a golf club or a tennis racket to swing away and HOPE no one gets injured.
Originally posted by Phenomium
In Canada, they have a gun register law and it's hard to get weapons. Does that stop killing? Nope! In Canada they stab the crap out of each other with knives lol. I am serious. If people are going to kill, they will kill, gun or no gun,
Originally posted by Naradia
Owning a gun means trouble, unless you use it for hunting or anything, but would having to own a license be so bad in that case?
Originally posted by mtnshredder
Has anyone stopped long enough to evaluate the cultural diversity that America has vs other countries? This needs to be figured into the equation. America has probably the most diverse culture in the world. We've accepted every culture, race and religion on the planet, for better or for worse, but yet were judged collectively when differences rear their ugly head. The growth rate here of various nationalities is probably higher than any other country, at least I can't think of one that's higher.
There is little empirical evidence that reducing general access to firearms reduces criminal violence. In fact, empiricial evidence suggests that the more punitive gun control is, the greater the level of violent crime. For example:
1. US per capita handgun ownership remained stable in the first 30 years of the 20th century, while the homicide rate rose tenfold; between 1937 and 1963, the American homicide rate fell 35.7%
2. In 1976, Washington D.C. enacted stringent gun controls. Since then, the homicide rate has risen 134% while the national rate fell 2%.
3. Maryland claims to have the "toughest gun laws" in the U.S., and has the highest robbery rate, and ranks 4th in violent crimes and murders.
4. 20% of American crimes occur in 4 cities with roughly 6% of the U.S. population (Detroit, Chicago, New York and Washington D.C.). Each has a virtual prohibition on private handguns.
5. Switzerland has fewer gun controls than the U.S., and lower crime.
6. Australia and England, which have essentially banned gun ownership, have the highest rates of robbery, sexual assault and assault among the top 17 industrialized countries.
7. Since banning guns, the UK has seen a dramatic rise in violent crime.
8. Since banning guns, Australia has seen greater than 100% increases in armed robbery, kidnapings, assaults, attempted murder and sexual assaults.
9. Alberta has the highest rates of firearm ownership in Canada. Alberta does not have the highest crime rate in Canada, and has the lowest crime rate in Western Canada.
Alberta has the highest gun ownership in Canada. As such, Albertans favor the right to bear arms to a much greater extent than other Canadians.
Further, restrictive gun control harms certain members of the population more than others, especially when self-defense is an issue. Women, by nature, tend to not have the physical strength of men. In a criminal attack by a man against a woman, the woman will in most cases be at a disadvantage. Firearms counteract this difference. Abridging the right to bear arms disproportionately harms women, which leads to some questions regarding the equality of right under the law.
VANCOUVER, Jan 23 (IPS) - Despite the government's official position abstaining from combat in Iraq, Canada has dispatched yet another top general to the command group overseeing day-to-day operations for the U.S.-led occupation and counterinsurgency war.
Brigadier-General Nicolas Matern, a Special Forces officer and former commander of Canada's elite counter-terrorism unit, will serve as deputy to Lt. Gen. Lloyd Austin III, incoming commander of the 170,000-strong Multi National Corps-Iraq beginning in mid-February.
Officials at Fort Bragg confirmed that Matern has already been deployed to Iraq, though no official statement has been made by Canadian officials.
There are also economic interests in Iraq itself. The April 2007 Iraq Reconstruction Report lists Canada as the fourth largest importer of Iraqi oil. Industry Canada records that total Canadian imports from Iraq have risen from 1.06 billion dollars in 2002 to 1.61 billion dollars in 2006, making Iraq second only to Saudi Arabia as a Middle Eastern source for Canadian imports.
According to Canada's Defence Policy Statement, the increased collaboration with the U.S. military will "not see the Canadian Forces replicate every function of the world's premier militaries," but rather fill niche roles that allow Canada's interventionist capabilities to be relevant and credible.
To this end, Matern's Special Forces background is seen as an asset. "He comes in with a unique set of skills," Col. Bill Buckner of the 18th Airborne told the Ottawa Citizen. "We're the home of the airborne and the special operating forces, so he fits in very nicely to this warrior ethos we have here."
Canada's most important foreign policy documents list Iraq, along with Afghanistan, Haiti, Sudan, and Israel-Palestine, as areas of "strategic priority".
Canada was an active participant in the 1991 Gulf War and helped enforce the crippling blockade on Iraq throughout the 1990s, but declined to join the so-called "coalition of the willing" in March of 2003 when the U.S. launched the invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein without a final U.N. resolution authorising the war.
Nevertheless, Canada's contribution to the mission is notable. In 2003, Canada pledged 300 million dollars in aid and reconstruction in Iraq. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police has helped train more than 30,000 Iraqi security forces in neighbouring Jordan, and has had top level advisors operating within the Iraqi interior ministry. As well, Canadian frigates continue to operate alongside the U.S. aircraft carriers in the Arabian Gulf that are a primary staging platform for bombing raids in Iraq.
Indeed, during the first week of the war in 2003, then-U.S. Ambassador to Canada, Paul Cellucci, said that Canada had provided "more support indirectly to this war in Iraq than most of the 46 countries that are fully supporting our efforts there."
Around the same time that Canada opted out of combat in Iraq, it increased its combat role in Afghanistan, ultimately taking command of the counterinsurgency war in southern Afghanistan.
Unlike the Canadian deployment in Afghanistan, which is subject to relatively significant coverage domestically, Canada's participation in Iraq is handled much more carefully by Canadian officials.
8. Since banning guns, Australia has seen greater than 100% increases in armed robbery, kidnapings, assaults, attempted murder and sexual assaults.
** from post above ... www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by TimBrummer
Originally posted by Phenomium
In Canada, they have a gun register law and it's hard to get weapons. Does that stop killing? Nope! In Canada they stab the crap out of each other with knives lol. I am serious. If people are going to kill, they will kill, gun or no gun,
Right, like a couple years back that Canadian guy who cut the head off of his fellow bus passenger!!! I have never heard someone do that in the States, instead our wack jobs use a gun. Either way the victim is dead!!
Originally posted by Honor93
For all my Canadian friends who appear to be sadly mistaken ...
well, you keep believin' you are somehow 'separate' from the US ... one day, you'll awaken to realize Niagara is the sole remnant of a border that used to be.
Originally posted by wayno
Since Americans feel the need and responsibility to defend themselves I am wondering what the limit is, or should be?
Should individuals be able to own anti-aircraft missiles? tanks? armoured cars fitted with machine guns?
Where's the limit and what would the rationale be??