It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Loughner Mug Shot released by Police could be a HOAX

page: 2
19
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:47 AM
link   
reply to post by aravoth
 


Aravoth, I thought the original mugshot was creepy enough. Sheesh, with that split and mirror now I'm gonna have nightmares, lol. Seriously creepy.

On a different note, it is interesting that subjects/agents with iatrogenic split personalities have been operationally viable (though not officially used) since the second world war. Of course there's always the possibility of childhood abuse or a factitious split or something, who knows. Regardless, the idea that a mental split could so clearly manifest itself physically is intriguing and, again, creepy. Or he could just have haemifacial microsmia, lol.


P.S. May I use one of those splits as an avatar or ats profile picture or w/e (likely the creepier one)?
edit on 11-1-2011 by ossminid because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:32 AM
link   
looks like he had half his face mashed up with a police boot...



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 04:32 AM
link   
The main catch (aside from the fact that the mugshot is out-of-place in the first instance) is that the drawings in court, supposedly drawn two days after this mugshot was taken, showed him as having hair and eyebrows.

1 - Why would the court artist lie/ misrepresent the subject? That would be a felony in itself (I'm guessing)?

2 - Why would he have shaved all his hair and eyebrows off? To avoid DNA capture? If so, why did he have hair in the court images...?


The split personality idea (and subsequent photos) proved incredibly creepy. I guess many of us might look that odd in such photo doctoring though, so we can't put too much stock in it.

However, the main point - that the photo has been manipulated - has not been debunked!

This is an active conspiracy, and I'm surprised that so little attention is coming its way. Are people afraid to post regarding this matter due to the alleged ATS membership held by the suspect, and anticipated attention from the outside world / PTB? Anyone who posts on here regularly is already on a 'list' so people have nothing to fear in posting their actual thoughts (unless those thoughts are psychotic and evidential of some kind of threats of course
...)

My initial (and 'conspiratorial') conclusions:

There is evidence that the photo has been manipulated.

There is a strong suggestion from images released thus far that the 'person' detained (he one in the mugshot) looks very different from Jared Loughner as he was known before this incident.

There is evidence that in some way the court artist has either committed a felony by misrepresenting the suspect, or conversely that the police department responsible for his delivery to court had 'dressed him' in a wig & fake eyebrows. In which case, why did he not take them off or draw attention to the fact that he is being messed with?! If he had shaved his head and eyebrows for the purposes of preventing DNA detection by forensic methods, that would be pertinent to the court hearing and he would need to arrive 'as is' in order for the court to reach the appropriate judgements based on all available evidence.

Meaning?

* This photo is a fake composite created by a computer program (perfectly feasible technologically), built using old images of Jared Loughner and without hair simply to add confusion into the identification process.

* The man in court is not Jared Loughner, but a stooge, and Jared Loughner has been 'deactivated' at an undisclosed location, his body destroyed in a 'clean & clear' operation.

* The stooge is likely a brainwashed or willing servant to the handlers, and will be disposed of in due course by 'suicide' or 'murder at the hands of an inmate'. He will then be redeployed under a new identity (or simply killed).



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 08:11 AM
link   
reply to post by aravoth
 



If you are curious, here is what it looks like when the original picture is run through the "image forensics" tool:

errorlevelanalysis.com...



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by endlessknowledge
I'm not sure about it being fake but it sure does look disturbing. His eyes look possessed and the smirk sure doesn't help.


He probably is. That would explain why they change colour.

Oh I forgot, he can't be because evil is only make-believe...



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sahabi
"If" the mug-shot has been edited in any way, I would bet the reason is to hide the bruises and swellings he must have suffered while in custody.


That was my first instict. His left eye looks bruised up. I had a black eye like that and it distorted the whole left side of my face. (roller blading accident :lol



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyInTheOintment
The main catch (aside from the fact that the mugshot is out-of-place in the first instance) is that the drawings in court, supposedly drawn two days after this mugshot was taken, showed him as having hair and eyebrows.

1 - Why would the court artist lie/ misrepresent the subject? That would be a felony in itself (I'm guessing)?

2).
oh my gosh- i thought the exact same thing when i was watching the news last night-- the artist drew him with hair!!! i am sorry this is not the same guy----and btw, the msm said this is NOT his mugshot. my husband (a complete skeptic of anything conspiratorial) just walked in with his WSJ to tell me that the guy in the picture today (on the front page-bald) is NOT the same guy who was on the front page yesterday-- he had both papers in his hand- i nearly fell off my chair



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by NuclearPaul

Originally posted by endlessknowledge
I'm not sure about it being fake but it sure does look disturbing. His eyes look possessed and the smirk sure doesn't help.


He probably is. That would explain why they change colour.

Oh I forgot, he can't be because evil is only make-believe...


Evil does exist. It is a label we use to define that which we have an emotional dislike for.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:11 PM
link   
No Eyebrows?
whats up with that?
if i was there, there would have been a lot less loss that day.
edit on 11-1-2011 by paratus because: had to recheck the check



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Anyway to scan those two pictures? or take pictures of them with your camera and upload them?

Originally posted by tiger28

Originally posted by FlyInTheOintment
The main catch (aside from the fact that the mugshot is out-of-place in the first instance) is that the drawings in court, supposedly drawn two days after this mugshot was taken, showed him as having hair and eyebrows.

1 - Why would the court artist lie/ misrepresent the subject? That would be a felony in itself (I'm guessing)?

2).
oh my gosh- i thought the exact same thing when i was watching the news last night-- the artist drew him with hair!!! i am sorry this is not the same guy----and btw, the msm said this is NOT his mugshot. my husband (a complete skeptic of anything conspiratorial) just walked in with his WSJ to tell me that the guy in the picture today (on the front page-bald) is NOT the same guy who was on the front page yesterday-- he had both papers in his hand- i nearly fell off my chair



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:23 PM
link   
The sketch from court:





posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
 


so what does that link mean, I read the info on the page, but I know nothing of photoshop or the like



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by inbound
What it means, is that the link showed there was no evidence (as I understand it- i might be completely wrong) of manipulation because any evidence of manipulation would become more apparent as the image was incrementally downgraded in quality, since the area manipulated would be at a lower quality than non-manipulated parts. How this is shown, I do not understand fully but I expect the manipulated areas would become more apparent since it would be of a different quality from the surrounding image.

I see some areas that seem redder, brighter but I'm not sure if this indicates manipulation or lighting.

From his posting history his decline into madness is increasingly apparent. Friends said he appeared to get worse when he stopped illegal drug use, specifically marijunana but it does seem from this image if this is an non-manipulated image of him, that he may have started to use harder drugs like meth.

If people were to google 'Faces of Meth' they will see dramatic changes in the appearances of people over a short time, if this means the appearance of moles and such, I do not know.

There is a possibly that he might have some sort of brain cancer.



edit on 11-1-2011 by star in a jar because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by aravoth
 




Damn.....


His mugshot already looks like the very definition of deranged...

He looks so far gone.

But your other pics are just scaaaaarrrryyyyyy man.




posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   
Didnt realise that .. but you have maybe found something very interesting
there are not many picture of the killer ... they all look different
the highschool picture .. he looks like a very normal high school student .. no bizzare loking
and not .. we have a picture of a very very odd weird looking guy smiling at the cam with some devil eye
and no sourcil .. did he shave them ??

about the mole .. i think some can appear but clearly the skin is different
i knew it was a cover up from the start


Gabrielle Giffords case (MANY MYSTERIES) Shot in the head..Strange Bird. FBI cover up

but this confirms it

thanks S&F



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Somebody should call CNN on that obvious cover up
will they make an article about it ?? or they are also part of the game of many cover ups

in a cover up shooting .. do they always kill childrens ...


MURDERERS



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
He reminds me of Uncle Festus from The Addams Family! If he had the same grin on his face during the interrogation, you can bet they beat the crap out of him. That smile is seriously creepy.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by inbound
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
 


so what does that link mean, I read the info on the page, but I know nothing of photoshop or the like



To me it looks like it is the real deal image. No image manipulation done, unless they have manipulated a photo, then took a photo of it.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   
As to the hair and eyebrows, it is not only possible, but likely that any defense lawyer would have their client look as normal and harmless as possible.

However, I think that there is definitely more going on here than meets the eye.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
Jeez he looks so weird. Those photoshops makes him look like some sort of creature.



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join