Not to move us into a tangent, the actual identification of Jared Loughner as the person with the YouTube account is not established, and it isn't
known that he is the one who made up those videos or wrote those texts. There is nowhere in there a single element enabling his personal
identification. The only thing it is based upon is that the account says his name right at the top.
I find this actually to mean that it is probably NOT his account. Jared was not a stupid person, and he had his own suspicions about the debatable
good intentions of The Powers That Be. Just like most people here at ATS who have issues with any number of problems in today's society. That is why
we all post anonymously. It is also why ATS will of its own unilateral choice quickly deletes any personal information ATS members post regarding
their identity or their coordinates. It is very unwise and Jared would therefore probably not have posted his name to his Real Name on his YouTube
page as seen on some screenshots.
Then we get a dubious "formal identification" by a Campus police officer. Add to this a falsified or at the very least image processed Mugshot
picture presented as the Official Release photo of the culprit and we have just cause for not believing much of anything regarding this case.
Now, to return to our analysis of the Giffords shooting itself, there are still a number of odd and unusual elements which make me wonder if former
Vice-Presidential Candidate and perhaps forthcoming Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin wasn't close to the mark when she let slip our her remark about
I already explained in a simplified way what this was, and it is very important to realize that this would NOT correspond to any type of Jewish
practice, and has nothing to do with Judaism, so let us not confuse this issue with antisemitism or with any form of prejudice or persecution. This
is strictly in the line of examining the various aspects of the Giffords shooting, and if there were an Irish connection, I would pursue it just as
diligently. Actually, as I noted earlier, there might also be an Irish Catholic connection, which would be interesting to examine, possibly in line
with the Jesuit influence? A wild card, we'll see if anything pans out on that front, but at this time there seems to be some leads on the Zionist
As I mentioned before Blood Libel is a several hundred years old term used in Northern and Eastern European accusations against the Jewish community,
and this was most unfortunate, because Jews were themselves victims throughout history of a "Stealth" sect gone underground after King David took over
Jerusalem and founded Judea, the land of the Jews. Prior to this it was a Canaanite city where the Saturn worshipers performed human sacrifice to
their pagan God. At this time they went underground, and hid among the Jewish society perpetrating against them crimes including perhaps the worst:
placing on the shoulders of innocent Jews the guilt of their misdeeds
So what I outline here is not about per se Blood Letting, which is a misnomer as it refers to unfair accusations against innocent Jews in past
centuries, it is about the several millennia old human sacrifice practices of a Zionist sect of Canaanite pagans who over the centuries have hidden
among the Jewish community, among the Royal Families such as the Saxe Coburg Gotha among others, among the Venitian Black Nobility, and among the
Illuminati Bloodlines. It is a SECT which uses Black Magick, satanic rituals, Kaballistic astrology and numerology and an abundance of esoteric
symbolism and rites, which defy the imagination yet unify these individuals into a strong network today constituting our Global Power Elite.
What does this have to do with the Giffords shooting? A lot if you consider that the presence on that location of a child born on 9/11 possibly had
symbolic significance for this group, who had already presumably sacrificed to their god Saturn or Satan several thousand people in the Twin Towers
the day she was born. Here is the testimony of the person who without solicitation and of her own initiative approached this child and convinced her
to come to that event in which she may well have been ritually sacrificed.
CLICK HERE for the Video - it will play after a short ad
We can legitimately choose to weigh her words for a hidden message. She states:
"So I said "Alright, Christina, let's do the math !" Christina did math. "How many Senators do we have? Hold that number ! How Many
Representatives do we have? Add that number ! Hold that number. Let's add the President and the Vice-President. You got that number ? That's the
number of people who make the laws that tell us how we live here in America today. And you are going to get to shake her hand."
She immediately follows this statement with a broad Hand Slap
like "swatting a Mosquito" and says gravely: "GUNSHOT"
. She was
referring to the first shot which went through Gabrielle Giffords' brain. Some may attribute this to story telling style, but I happen to find their
alleged conversation strange and unusual, given that Suzi Hileman's account places it at the exact time leading to the Shooting of Representative
GIffords. It itemizes in full listing all legislative bodies, mathematically adding each and every person with law making power, all methodically
added together and lumped into the same basket: those with law making authority, in the instants preceding a Political Hit against a dissident law
maker, Representative Gabrielle Giffords.
If you forget this happened in the United States of America and transpose the events to, say, a Latin American dictatorship, what conclusions would
you come to? It would be obvious this was a HIT and that that was a clear threat message to all not so stupid as to not understand. But then you
think, "This is the United States of America, we don't have bad people like that doing terrible things, we're a democracy." But are we? When our
lawmakers are being INTIMIDATED if not ASSASSINATED for doing the job we have entrusted them to do by our democratic votes? Clearly somebody doesn't
want the USA to be a democracy.
We know that Gabrielle Giffords had recently pushed through the US Congress a bill which apparently brought her reprisals in the form a a Murder Hit.
She gained congressional funding of some $600 Million to increase border patrols at the permeable borders South of Tucson, the location where the CIA
imports drugs into the USA. We can expect that it was for this very reason that she was TARGETED by the Republican Party with SNIPER Gun-Sight
Cross-Hairs, to make sure that all the other members of the Congress and the Senate got the picture.
My personal conclusion is that Suzi Hileman is a Zionist MK Ultra operative who took Christina to be Ritually Sacrificed. Keep in mind that many of
the children ritually sacrificed in private settings, in cellars and basements, are brought by people they trust, unaware of their impending doom. In
so doing Suzi Hileman is also delivering to all political opponents of her fellow Zionists a fairly clear threat message. All Congressmen and
Senators, the U.S. President and the Vice-President will, without hesitation, be assassinated if they don't bow to their authority. "Look, we'll even
kill a nine year old girl, so don't mess with us! Pass OUR laws, or you're squashed like a Mosquito."
Christina Green’s Neighbor: ‘It Was My Job to Bring Her
The above article misrepresents this testimony signifying that it was Christina who was asking her questions, when Suzi Hileman, the only surviving
participant of that conversations relates it as under her own initiative and control.. Her testimony has some other disturbing aspects, such as her
apparent good health despite 3 bullet wounds which were described by the press as "critical" only a few days earlier, and including her saying "It was
my job to bring her home to her mom and dad." Since when is that a JOB? She was a neighbor, not an employee of the Greens. Is she saying that she
was sent on a job to take Christina there? In case we're on to her, is she pretending that her mission was not a one way trip? That she wasn't in on
Christina's sacrificial murder?
Here is a link to thread in another forum which is already 28 pages long. It discusses Suzi Hiliman's MK-Ultra connections. This is alarming because
it places somebody with Mind Control antecedents at the crime scene where we presume an MK-Ultra Mind Controlled Manchurian Candidate did shooting,
whether Jared Loughner or somebody else.
Susan Hileman who took the 9-yr-old Christina Green to see Gabby in AZ.
This is also cause for concern because it connects CIA Mind Control Programmed Assassin Programs with a Zionist Agenda including the ritual sacrifice
of children. Oh, but wait. I almost forgot, that's what the Station Chief for the Los Angeles FBI said that the CIA does: The CIA kidnaps and
supplies the Zionist Elite with children for sex magick snuff films and satanic child sacrifice blood drinking ceremonies.
If you are considering that this couldn't be because there's no way all the armies of journalists and investigative teams would have made declarations
to this effect, then that does spell a world I also wished we lived in, as it would make our task in life far easier. All it would take is to live a
decent life and all would be fine. Yet today to be a decent person living life as clean as a whistle is not enough. What do you think of those who
did so, on the outskirts of Dachau and Buchenwald? They were doing good to those whom they met with, and not minding what didn't concern them. But
didn't it? If we are here in a Conspiracy Forum it is because of just that, we have noticed that "something smells rotten in the Kingdom of Denmark",
to quote Shakespeare. For we are not the first nor the last to sniff out such combinations of special interests which plot, deceive and usurp power.
For a small glimpse of the fact that we are in a continuity of manipulation by the press, here is a quote of John Swinton who was eight years Editor
in Chief of the New York Sun and for some ten years Editor in Chief of the New York Times, throughout the Civil War. He made this statement some 130
years ago in 1880, when invited by the assembled New York City press corps, at a diner where he was guest of honor. One of the guests proposed a
toast the "The Independence of the Press" which elicited this reply:
"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it."
"There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid
weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you
who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in
one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone."
"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his
country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?"
"We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
In case you aren't familiar with the word mammon, fallen in disuse, it is the personification of Greed as a deity, implying "dishonest gain". Yet
today the press has "devolved" into a shell function, used in order to place complicit intelligence operatives or spineless propagandists at the beck
and call of a dictated editorial line, such as John Swinton described. Thanks to this we today find huge amounts of valid information on the Internet
from people whose profession is not in that realm, because The press has become an Information Extinguisher.
I sincerely wish that there was no implication of any party leading to the first degree murder of an innocent young girl as victim of a ritual
sacrifice. However all indications seem to point to this, and the direct complicity of the Police force and the FBI investigating this crime cannot
be discounted unless they get into motion and prove that they are doing the task they are paid for, and for which they have taken an oath with its
consequences if betrayed.. We should apply whatever pressure is necessary so that each and every investigating officer knows they are in the public
eye and the we are judging their positions to pursue the matter without complacency.
edit on 25-1-2011 by Getsmart because: something smell rotten in the Kingdom of Denmark.