Yes well half of ATS has their own version of currency which they want to introduce. I would not consider his attempts to propagate his ideas on
Youtube proof that his killing spree was premeditated, and therefore proof that he is sane. Insane people can still use technology and express
themselves. When you talk about him constructing his own version of reality, that does point to schizophrenia and other psychopathologies, and when
you say he had intended to use youtube to influence others, well, yes of course, but the fact that he has his own interpretation of the world that
does not fit with anyone elses kind of places doubt on whether if it were his intention to influence or not, that regardless, only a person with the
level of his strangeness could understand, meaning that yeah, they are probably both insane or deeply misguided and should get treatment. Inciting
people to act as he does and talk as he does...thats just arrogance. Yeah, his choice of grammar was strange, but that is because he did not feel so
many words were necessary to express himself. I said before he seemed to see the world in either black or white, meaning he saw only the two sides of
the coin without realizing that the world is a globe, because he had a habit of promoting deductive reasoning to everything until the topic at hand
was a question of yes or no. When he breaks down actions and thoughts to that level before accepting the thought or committing the action, then you
could say he is a psychopath because his thought process is singular and bleak and at total mercy of how he chooses, in other words impulsive.
I agree that the alter suggests that he might have been performing rituals to prepare or conjure up a state of mind for his own comfort, and that it
is reason to believe he had planned to murder, which I don't doubt at all he that he had planned to. But insane people also do plan. I should make it
clear though that I'm not concluding he is insane, only strange.
Until he testifies as to why he chose to murder, then we cannot diagnose him or sentence him. Otherwise without finding out his reasoning, our
reasoning will just bring us in circles with you saying "in light of this he is not insane" and me saying "yes but insane people can do this as
well", because premeditation is not an exclusive attribute of a healthy mind.
Im watching the vids now for the first time, and I think I was right when I said he was trying to send a significant message but “mucked” it up in
his strange expression of things. I’ll try to explain his thoughts better for him.
when he talks of people having their own currency, I think he is talking about people having their own creativity, whatever it is that makes them an
individual, and that we as “treasurers” distribute that currency. He is constantly asking to the individual to take control of himself, or to at
least for the individual to realize they are only what they allow others to make themselves out to be. Im sure we have all heard of the term sheeple.
This is what he is trying to get across when he mentions our illiteracy. He does not want us to follow what his version of literacy. Just that we
understand we determine our level of literacy, yet, the models by which we compare and determine our literacy is not control by us, for the most part,
as our world is a structure that has been constructed by higher authorities.
I think in his first video he is trying to tell us that we are all brainwashed to a certain point, depending on the person. When he said “if I had
my civil rights, then this would never have happened”, that he realized like many of us here at ATS understand, that our entire reality is
manipulated, that we don’t know the whole truth of anything, and that a lot of it is hidden deliberately from us. From his point of view, he may
have understood this and realized that anyone withholding the truth is a manipulator of conscious reality, therein defining what he implies as being
consciously asleep. We have no real choice but to live in a hypnotic state, and that even when we sleep, we don’t dream real dreams, only dreams
shaped by our imagination for as much as we have witnessed reality. In other words, even our dreams are manipulated. So when he says that he and a few
others and “sadly” not the rest of us can “dream”, he is hinting towards his own freedom from the invisible bondage that the
elite/govt/authorities etc have created to pin down our whole freedoms. Like he says, if only he truly had his civil rights.
When he said “in a few days, you know I’m conscious dreaming”, its irony. In other words, he is breaking free from this supposed bondage, and he
will do something unimaginable, the unimaginable being that which breaks the barriers imposed upon us “normal” people by the “controllers’ so
to speak. He will do what we feel is wrong, but according to him, what we feel is wrong is only because our minds are being controlled, they have been
preprogrammed and shaped so as not to see the significance/symbolism in his actions-that he has seen the invisible chains and broken free, and that
now he is going to do something about it to prove his freedom, and at the same time to open our eyes as well.
You must remember that he is using irony in his dialogue when he refers to dreamers. You could equate his “dreamers” to anarchists, or anyone who
can see beyond the mainstream and beyond what is presented to us. In actuality, the dreamers are the realists of this world, the ones who know the
truth about the government, the environment, wars, disease, all those conspiracy theories that seem everyday to be less theory and more fact.
Remember the first part his talk of years? The 982,128,927,912 BCE nonsense? Well if you read his conclusion, you would have to admit that yes, he is
right. If I try to think in his place, what he is trying to imply is that one thing is, or isn’t, period. Things are actually much more clear than
they appear. You just have to have the clarity of thought to begin with. In that statement, where he concludes by saying “Therefore, the year
previous of‘X’ is ‘X’. In other words, (trying to speak from his POV) “I see with clarity, and what I have to say is something that should
be just as obvious as this riddle of years is”. So we must try to think without prejudice and only from his POV what seems obvious to him, and that
year riddle was like a conditioning exercise for us who do not at the moment see like him, to now at the very least try to see like him.
By BCE having no point of beginning, unless you take it from the exact point of the creation or interpretation of time, how could ADE ever have its
own point of origin? BCE and ADE would be one endless point in time. This is what I believe he is trying to say when he talks about time. He seems to
understand that times limit is only produce by ones inability to interpret time itself, and that is it only because “we” have created points in
time, that time exists, such as seconds and years. Otherwise if we had not created points in time, time would either never have existed or always have
existed-but never realized, because it was neverending and impossible to identify in origin. Time would be endless. ADE would be (and is according to
him) forever. That is until someone in some high authority decides to split time once again, yet the paradoc would continue.
When he talks about forming an 8 year old’s mind, he is explaining without the process of explanation that we “normal” people require, that all
of us are capable of being formed and taught anything, for so long as it is impressed upon us enough. After this he goes on to say that “any person
who is mentally capable is always able to be treasurer of their new currency”, or in other words, that if we can be impressed upon, we can also
impress; that if we have the capability to think for ourselves, we can therefore share our thoughts. What we know, we are able to impart. But What do
we know? Only what others know. I believe these are the sorts of questions he wants us to ask ourselves. The currency and treasurer are just a
metaphors for an individuals thought and the actions, or more correctly, our potential to act within our own individuality. In other words, to create
a new way of living, a new system of government, a new currency that others can also purchase with if they themselves do not have a “valuable
currency” of their own. But the fact, he concludes, that we all have the ability to create out own “currency” (realities/thoughts) is something
that we all should understand. We all have freedom. We have civil rights and liberties. But like he seems to suggest, those have been taken away and
we don’t even know it, and now we are slaves to another entities “currency”. Im beginning to think the murders were his way of proving he was a
free individual, to a certain extent. But I haven’t finished his intro video yet, and there are still 4 more. So Ill continue.
He then questions us. You’re a treasurer for a new currency, listener? You create and distribute your own currency, listener? You do not allow the
government to control your grammar structure, listener? This is a rhetorical question. Because we do allow an authority to determine our grammar
structure, we are therefore slaves to that authority’s currency, because we only know as much “grammar” (of reality) as the authority has taught
us. Therefore, we are only issuing an old currency. Until we discover reality beyond the confines in which we are stuck, beyond what is taught to us,
we will be under “control”. He is telling us to wake up.
He says all humans need sleep, including himself. But then he says he is a perpetual sleep walker, meaning he is always asleep, yet still active,
unlike us, who only sleep in intervals. I don’t think he is saying he is hypnotized or anything of the sort. Here he sort of mixed up a realistic
conclusion with a fantastic explanation from which he derived a secondary conclusion. Well if we are to take his ironic suggestions early that we are
all asleep or unaware of reality, then he is saying that he is always aware, but saying it in riddle. Or he is living in the same dream as us, but
never waking up like we do. Hm. if we go back and forth between waking up and sleep, then that means there are moments of epiphany that we each
experience, but do not cling on to like him? Those moments of epiphany to us, of realization, are equivalent to dreams. And actual dreams are product
of conscious dreaming, or controlled dreaming, therefore, not real dreams. And he goes on to say that he is consciously dreaming, but conscious
dreaming at the moment is asleep, therefore he is also asleep. If I am to take him for his irony, that means he is actually “awake”, aware,
He says that we will term him as a terrorist, someone politically motivated, according to his definition. And that when we call him a terrorist, we
are in fact only trying undermine him, that we are presenting a farcical explanation of him in order to distort who he really is. With this is mind,
we should therefore not term him as a terrorist, and we should certainly not trust a single notion presented by anyone to try and define him, unless
it comes directly from him, as he subscribes to the idea that “one is only as much as another so believes”. But he is clearly warning us not judge
him or accept any argument that may muddy his image. We must see beyond the fact that he is a murder, we must see beyond his political views, we must
see beyond whatever else the media may try to paint him as. That does not mean we should forgive him or accept his murders, and Im not suggesting at
all he did anything acceptable by killing innocent people. But for the sake of understanding this man, I believe we should follow his advice.
He is from the military. He is not religious. He says this himself. He is not or does not subscribe to any religion. Yet he was given a mini bible
upon recruitment? He is trying to imply something here. Is it possible he was saying he was indoctrinated into something? Being a recruit, was he
chosen to be a part of something secret, hence the Bible, or “book of conduct”, even though he did not want to be, or maybe he did? This does not
necessarily mean he joined any religious sect or cult, but I believe he is trying to tell us he was introduced into something. And the tests? Why, if
we are take his writings at face value, would they give a mini-bible before an army test? Can anyone in the military elaborate on this? Otherwise I
can only speculate that he was in fact taken under the wing of some secret entity, or that some entity is trying to impose some sort of thought
process or idea upon him and possibly the entire military as well. But he makes it clear that he has no beliefs, meaning he could have been against
what they were trying to impose upon him. This could be a motive for the murders. It is possible that he was under pressure from some government
entity, and that this entity is doing something that he does not agree with, and that the murders and attempted murder of the specific authorities at
Tucson may have been related to this entity, and he did something so terrible in the hopes that none of us could pretend to not notice anymore, so
that all of us would discover what he knew.
At this point you might be thinking, “well why didn’t he just tell us?” First off, so far from the first two vids alone I am starting to believe
he had some kind of connection to the government that would have made it difficult for him to do so even if he wanted to. So he chose riddles. Yes, he
is certainly strange to begin with, but that only makes the riddles more important to decipher. But lets just put our doubts aside and continue
The reference to the constitution I do not think is too hard to understand. Read the constitution to understand how our government is committing
treason in numerous ways. I would have to support this. He then again calls us out on our literacy, seeming to taunt us to do something which we would
normally not do, which is read the constitution.
He is trying to incite a revolution, and he is telling us that even though the laws are against us, and even though our property does not belong to
us, revolution will always belong to the revolutionary. This is following in line with the Bolsheviki propaganda during the Russian Revolution, and it
is true. Read “Ten Days That Shook the World”, and you will see that is trying to inspire revolution, or at least get the ball moving. The Moron
just chose the worst way possible. Sadly, when I really think about it, this might have been the only way possible. He had to grab the most attention
he could, otherwise he would have failed from the start. You may argue that by murdering he failed, but once again I implore you, just as he is, to
see beyond the murders, and even beyond the superficial politics, and take into consideration what he is saying in his videos-what I’m trying to
make sense of now. He used the sickest method to do us Americans the greatest good. He is no hero. He is a murderer. But we are not looking to give
him a title. We are only seeking to discover the reasons. Please keep this in mind.
In his third vid, How to:Mind controller, he is directly stating government control over history and beliefs, or whatever authority controls the
systems by which we learn it. He is saying that anyone who edits religion and beliefs until the end of the time, or in his words the “final
century”, that this person is just as good as the original writer, the person who created the belief in the first place, which makes sense. He then
goes on to say that he is his own writer and editor, he controls every belief and religion- he controls his own mind. He is trying to show us, even
ask us that we have to have control over ours. He seems to believe that if we did, we would be thinking along the same lines as him, that being
revolutionary thought. Once again, his process of thinking is a bit strange, but he is beginning to make much sense. Still, hes a damned murderer. But
it is important for everyone, including the prosecutor during his trials and the judge who declares his guilt, to understand what he meant by his
murders, not simply that he is a murderer, otherwise we will all would have let him down, and apparently ourselves and our country. To me, he is
beginning to look like the worst patriot we ever had. But then again, he says he is not politically motivated, or was he saying that he was, but just
not affiliated with any ideology other than what now appears to be a constitutionalist ideology? Its easy to see just by his connection to the tea
party that this may be the case, but it seems he predicted and is warning us not to get caught in the party frenzy. I think we should take his
He says we are all victims of fraud because what we purchase is not really ours. This is speculative, but when you think about your cars, property,
assets… your just paying to be the caretaker of it all. Real estate does not belong to any private owner, we all know this much. He mentions his
education is unconstitutional and cites Section 10 of the constitution of the USA. Sadly, he did mention which article, so I am thinking he meant the
first since it is the only one with 10 sections:
Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 10 - Powers Prohibited of States
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any
Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of
Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for
executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the
Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or
Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of
---Im not entirely sure where he is drawing this conclusion from. He follows it up by saying that if you are receiving a grade from the college he
attends (and probably every other college), that it is unconstitutional because of the Bill of Rights, and that grades which you “purchased by means
of tuition” is fraudulent and unconstitutional. I suppose this last remark is taking things a bit out of context, because we pay tuition for the
education and course, not the grade. In the most positive way I can think of this last remark, he puts up a good reform policy. “Pay according to
your Grade”. But the most troublesome part is what he means when he says that receiving grades in college crosses the Bill of Rights. I wish he had
explained further, as I can only think of so many ways to connect the dots, and I don’t want to place more words in his mouth than I already have.
Therefore I would conclude that it is possible he meant for college students or anyone reading his videos for that matter to read the constitution,
and read the Bill of Rights, not to discover how our college educations are unconstitutional, but so to become aware of the constitution once again
and begin to compare what it states is lawful and what is our rights, and what is unlawful and treasonous, and take action?
He goes on to rant about the unconstitutionality of free education provided by the government. I believe this is because the constitution never
allowed the government to do so, but also never explicitly said it could not either. It is one of those situations where a loophole was found and
exploited, and he obviously does not like this. This goes as well for the police comments. He then tells us we are illiterate and do not know English
grammar. Its obvious he is referring to how lawyers and politicians, and essentially we who follow the educational system they create, have
misunderstood or completely and consciously manipulated the clear wording of the constitution. Once again, he reminds us that every individual has the
power to create his own reality, thus subsequently implying that all are also capable to be delusioned by anothers reality. He concludes by telling us
not to trust the government because the institutions it has created for us and by which it conditions us is unconstitutional, therefore invalid, and
that if we follow along the path they have carved, we are unconstitutional beings. We are traitors. Obviously the conclusions he has drawn are
condensed, but that does not mean he is wrong.
Finally we are at the last Video, How To: Your New Currency! (Your new mind/thoughts).
He is talking about building up your individuality. That’s obvious. He is saying that it matters not what you name it, when it came into being, or
how much of it you have. He is saying that you can impose your new currency violently (as he did) or non violently. But now you have a new currency.
You have a new coin that you did not have before. In other words, If I have been close to right in explaining what he was trying to say in all his
vids, his thoughts through my words are now creating a new thought (currency) in you, which cannot be used in an old monetary system (thought
process), which requires a new monetary system (new thought process) from which you can begin to collect more of the new currency (more information on
these new thoughts) and distribute it (impose either violently or non violently), as you are the treasurer (the one in control) of your currency (your
thoughts), that is IF you are literate (self reliant, creative, an individual, and not controlled by the subversive and unconstitutional methods of
So people. What do you think of him now? Hes a sick murderer, but he was not insane. He had a purpose, and he was quite clear while trying to get it
across. He was hypnotized, he was free. To me, he was the US’s equivalent of an Islamic freedom fighter. He martyred whatever was left of his
freedom, and he tried to take others with him. I think now that yes, he used Youtube to propagate his ideas, of course. He wanted this message to get
out, and he wanted to to spread like a virus. The murderes were premeditated, but controlled by someone else? That’s is just about as close to
opposite as you can get. He in fact is trying to show you that you are the one who is being controlled, and that only because he was free,
sleepwalking, consciously dreaming... whatever he wants to call it, that he was able to do what he did.
What I am not understanding is the alter that was found. He says he had no religious belief. He had no mainstream political view. Regardless, I care
not for his beliefs. I hope you all can at the very least see the message of his actions.