Sarah Palin's Crosshairs Website Quickly Scrubbed From Internet

page: 3
13
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by kinda kurious
reply to post by sara123123
 


Sorry honey but:



I'll help her out!

www.dailykos.com...

They defend their own and, maybe inadvertently, Palin's "crosshairs" as well




posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 01:53 AM
link   
Did anywhere on Sarah's page to get a gun and shoot these people? If so, show me please, asnd I'll be the first to jump on the bandwagon
No she did NOT, she said to target these individuals because of their policies and vote them out of office
You ALL know that, stop trying to imply things that arent there, this is getting BEYOND idiotic
Grow up.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 01:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Jayhawker
 


Thats more like it.

Thanks.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 02:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by HomerinNC
Did anywhere on Sarah's page to get a gun and shoot these people? If so, show me please, asnd I'll be the first to jump on the bandwagon
No she did NOT, she said to target these individuals because of their policies and vote them out of office
You ALL know that, stop trying to imply things that arent there, this is getting BEYOND idiotic
Grow up.


Help me out here....

If I painted crosshairs on your picture or on your name; You wouldn't see that as threatening? You know damn well you would, As would I. This right wing damage control is so transparent and not working very well. If exgov. Palin wasn't concerned about how the crosshairs appeared: why did she take them down so fast. Sorry it's much to late, the damage is done, and that will be the image that defines Palin from here on out.
edit on 9-1-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 04:43 AM
link   
it would tell me that you dont like me, thats fine; I dont care who likes me or not. If some wacko was reading your website and saw that and decided upon himself to shoot me thats on him not you, and i wouldnt hold you responsible



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 05:34 AM
link   
Why is...

'Sarah Palin's Crosshairs Website Quickly Scrubbed From Internet' located in the 'General Conspiracy' Forum?

Not only has this hit twitter, tweets from various independent journalists and other media representatives (msm)

It has hit the press!

How can this be a general conspiracy when its NEWS and its CONFIRMED?

According to journalists tweets Palin removed a photo of her illustrating 2 guns with her hands (bang bang) off her offical website and facebook photos

Mods please move this thread to the appropriate section



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 06:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by soficrow
If Assange can be charged, and Wikileaks charged...

then Palin should be charged. Her actions were beyond irresponsible - they resulted in murder at her direction.


Assange and Wikileaks are not charged

For the moment DOJ has not issued subpoenas to Twitter, Internet Providers, Google or Facebook asking for ALL "followers/following" Accounts to be handed over of those who follow these politicans who incite this type of dangerous behaviour via their speeches/comments ..

DOJ has done this with ALL wikileak followers (american and people from all over the world) that includes all media outlets/ journalists who are followers/following wikileaks (american and international)

Isnt that interesting?

DOJ for the moment in this case (shooting) is looking the other way

According to Roger Ebert (from rogerebert.suntimes.com) Tweet

"This ad was run by Giffords' rightist opponent"


Sat, 6/12/10, 10:00 AM
"Get on target for Victory in
November Help remove
Garielle Giffords from office Shoot a fully
automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly"

img406.imageshack.us...


During his campaign effort to unseat Giffords in November, Republican challenger Jesse Kelly held fundraisers where he urged supporters to help remove Giffords from office by joining him to shoot a fully loaded M-16 rifle. Kelly is a former Marine who served in Iraq and was pictured on his website in military gear holding his automatic weapon and promoting the event
Snippet from the Huffington Article



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 06:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Jayhawker
 


Thanks for the reference, Jayhawker.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by kinda kurious
So innocent bystanders (including a nine year old girl with zero government ties) are mercilessly slaughtered and this is somehow directly / indirectly the government's fault? If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were implying a collateral damage argument.
edit on 9-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)


While I was more referring to the stream of conversation about the increasingly inflammatory nature of political pundits, I certainly don't take specific instances and parse them up like you are.

The point is that while the 9 year old girl is tragic, I am not surprised. America has always been a nation of radicals and we are now re-emerging from a sort of stasis sleep brought on by prosperity. Yes, these things will happen increasingly because of the conditions on the ground. This is not to discount random crazy people doing crazy things.

I'm arguing no cause in this debate, just stating the reality of the situation.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by KrazyJethro
 


Thanks for the clarification.
I apologize if I minced your words as it was not my goal.

I realize it was a stark observation without emotion or bias. Sometimes tone / intent is difficult to perceive in internet forums relying solely on written words.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by whaaa
Do you think we're fools. We know exactly what you mean and it isn't "train wreck"
Do you think blood in the streets will be "fun"?


I suppose that sarcasm doesn't come across well in blank text so I'll be more clear. Do I think train wreck implies blood in the street? Of course I do and I anticipate those days, especially since I see Europe as the forerunner of things to come in America due to the US being slightly more insulated to these types of things.

Do I think it will be fun? No, not really. It could very well be a much larger scale Katrina without real end outside of military lock down. There will be violence, make no mistake. Most American's can't seem to figure out that our "society" and our "progress" is really a fancy veneer that can be stripped away quite easily.

I'm concerned, but hold out hope still, slim as it might be.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by kinda kurious
reply to post by KrazyJethro
 


Thanks for the clarification.
I apologize if I minced your words as it was not my goal.

I realize it was a stark observation without emotion or bias. Sometimes tone / intent is difficult to perceive in internet forums relying solely on written words.


You're most welcome, and I was certainly not offended as I realized (upon reading it this morning) what some potential connotations could have been meant by my trite post.

I feel like incendiary commentary certainly doesn't help the current awakening of the American people, but they are not the causis belli for most. The difference between the founding of this nation and now is that we have actually devolved from the state of philosophical politics that escalated and formed the basis for this nation.

Any disruption in our current system will bring about something radically different than what we enjoy now, be it from the left or from the right. The nation is polarized and what makes it even worse is that most people have no idea what the hell they are talking about so their opinions (majority as it may be) are superficial and superfluous.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Ellen15
 


Thanks - and I know, charges are "pending."

RE: the screen shot. ...I was tired and messed up. Meant to point out that it was from Kelly's campaign and so, supported the idea of a "conspiracy."



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by sara123123
 


Yes..i know it's not literal..

too you and me maybe, because we are *normal* thinking people..

well, i hope you are...

but to a twisted mind,seeing a bullseye or cross hairs on a person,,

could mean an entirely different thing to them..

wouldn't you agree to that?



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 11:00 AM
link   
I am suprised that senator wheeler is not on there. This is strange how 2 senators were attacked so close together. Wheeler was murdered and now this congresswoman is shot! Hmmmm...



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 11:02 AM
link   
reply to post by baddmove
 


To a consiracy theorist something like that might be seen as something that might recquire further investigation. I really don't think it takes a twisted mind to see something from it. It may not be literal but then again who nows.
What is normal anyways?



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by dreamseeker
I am suprised that senator wheeler is not on there. This is strange how 2 senators were attacked so close together. Wheeler was murdered and now this congresswoman is shot! Hmmmm...


Hmm..interesting theory there..

hopefully we don't see anymore senators go down in the near future..

strange times we live in.....



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 05:46 PM
link   
At the risk of being redundant, I feel this info is important enough to repost in all current threads regarding this tragedy:


Sarah Palin Sticks to Her Guns, and Gun Imagery, in Message to Supporters




"The crossfire is intense, so penetrate through enemy territory by bombing through the press, and use your strong weapons -- your Big Guns -- to drive to the hole. Shoot with accuracy; aim high and remember it takes blood, sweat and tears to win," Palin wrote. In the headline of her update, she mockingly predicted that the message would be "subject to new politically correct language police censorship."


SOURCE



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by baddmove
 


We must never surrender the bill of rights to accomodate kooks in socierty. From what we have lost with the Patriot Act you would think the Obama supporters would know this by now. If that were the case the constituion's Bill of Rights would have never existed in America for we have never been a society without kooks. You might not like Palin's speech and she might not like Soros' speech. But neither fascist/communist wannabe gets to outlaw the speech other other.





new topics
top topics
 
13
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join