Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Sarah Palin's Crosshairs Website Quickly Scrubbed From Internet

page: 2
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by soficrow
 


How do you know? Is there any proof that the killer is a follower of Palin?


No there is not, if anything he hates her.

I have been reading post all over the internet and this is getting dangerous, unless some of you want to see another catastrophe take place.

This is sickening
edit on 093131p://bSaturday2011 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   
Daily Kos targeted Gabrielle Giffords with a "bulls eye" back in June of 2008

Democrats use "bulls eye" targets extensively in their political graphics. This map shows states Democrats want targeted. Arizona, which Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords represents, is surrounded by these targets.

Then you have to blame the daily KOS as well

hillbuzz.files.wordpress.com...

hillbuzz.org... two-days-before-assassination-attempt-on-her/



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 09:33 PM
link   
It is MY OPINION that the Palin Crosshairs graphic appeals to THESE FOLKS:






posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 09:35 PM
link   
Here's another screenshot from Palin's disappeared page:




Got that?

Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office

Shoot a fully automatic M16




edit on 8/1/11 by soficrow because: to add headline



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 09:42 PM
link   
reply to post by soficrow
 


Wow..

good find Soficrow...

just wow...



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 10:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


very interesting...

that second link is kinda scary too...


good point!



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:03 PM
link   
Hey guys, not to burst your bubble or anything, but the MSM is reporting that according to his friends he was a "very left wing political radical." That doesn't sound like the kind of guy that would listen to Palin.

Not that politics plays any factor at all in this. The guy was nuts, just read what he wrote on this site or check out his youtube profile.



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Jayhawker
 


Since you just joined today you might not be aware that it is prudent to offer links to sources when you make claims like that. Thanks.
edit on 8-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jayhawker
Hey guys, not to burst your bubble or anything, but the MSM is reporting that according to his friends he was a "very left wing political radical." That doesn't sound like the kind of guy that would listen to Palin.

Not that politics plays any factor at all in this. The guy was nuts, just read what he wrote on this site or check out his youtube profile.


Don't try to reason with them it is futile,

Although Palin dug herself a very big hole with those ads I am afraid,

I just don't want to see anyone else get hurt.

The whole think makes me feel queasy, honestly, there is some nasty negative energy.



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:15 PM
link   
IMHO: Images with cross-hairs might give the nuttiest of nut-balls "bad" ideas. It's bad enough when compliant citizens take up arms for a cause. "Just start loving each other. Please." Not shoot each other.



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777

Originally posted by Jayhawker
Hey guys, not to burst your bubble or anything, but the MSM is reporting that according to his friends he was a "very left wing political radical." That doesn't sound like the kind of guy that would listen to Palin.

Not that politics plays any factor at all in this. The guy was nuts, just read what he wrote on this site or check out his youtube profile.


Don't try to reason with them it is futile,

Although Palin dug herself a very big hole with those ads I am afraid,


I just don't want to see anyone else get hurt.


The whole think makes me feel queasy, honestly, there is some nasty negative energy.


You got that right...

Apparently all the anti Democratic/Progressive rantings of Rush, Beck, ORilly, Sean, Savage, Ingraham, Bork, Hal Turner, Medved, Levin, Ann Coulter, etc. are finally beginning to bear fruit.




I just don't want to see anyone else get hurt.


Then tell the Right Wing spokespeople like the above to stop with the inflammatory rhetoric or there will be a lot more people hurt.


Palin is toast...
edit on 8-1-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by whaaa
 


How do you know that this guy was influenced by Beck or Palin? It is possible, but an MSNBC article talks about this guy being nuts in 2005, while he was in college. This was obviously brewing in his mind for some time.



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by whaaa
 


How do you know that this guy was influenced by Beck or Palin? It is possible, but an MSNBC article talks about this guy being nuts in 2005, while he was in college. This was obviously brewing in his mind for some time.


I'm not specifically talking about this nut case....

Ever hear of copy cat killers? Do you really think that the constant hate/fear mongering from the Right isn't having an affect on other crazy people.

edit on 8-1-2011 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2011 @ 11:49 PM
link   
Inflammatory or not makes no real difference. It doesn't even really matter who, if anyone, the shooter followed or listen to.

At the end of the day, when government gets so deceitful, so corrupt, and terribly disinterested in real people or even the founding documents, things like this will happen. Add to that the increasingly tough economic times and we have a gumbo that will yield its own fruit.

Stupid opportunists (Left/Rightwing pundits, MSM, etc) will always be around, they will just get more airtime as time goes on or get shut down by a nervous government.

The fun is yet to come me thinks, and by fun I mean horrible train wreck.

I'm surprised that I haven't seen any mention about the serious potential for government crackdowns and expansion of power to combat it's own scary populace. Every time this type of thing occurs will further press the government into our affairs.
edit on 8-1-2011 by KrazyJethro because: Additions



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
Lol at palins team, thiking they can control the internet!!!!

here is a cached version of her website-

webcache.googleusercontent.com...:koF70deULPgJ:www.takebackthe20.com/+takebackthe20&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

and I downloaded the entire website too incase they take everything offline!


SARAHHHHHHH you dont own the internet lol.
edit- cac hed copy
edit on 1/9/2011 by VonDoomen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyJethro
At the end of the day, when government gets so deceitful, so corrupt, and terribly disinterested in real people or even the founding documents, things like this will happen...


So innocent bystanders (including a nine year old girl with zero government ties) are mercilessly slaughtered and this is somehow directly / indirectly the government's fault? If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were implying a collateral damage argument.
edit on 9-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyJethro


The fun is yet to come me thinks, and by fun I mean horrible train wreck.



Do you think we're fools. We know exactly what you mean and it isn't "train wreck"
Do you think blood in the streets will be "fun"?



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by kinda kurious
reply to post by Jayhawker
 


Since you just joined today you might not be aware that it is prudent to offer links to sources when you make claims like that. Thanks.
edit on 8-1-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)


You're right. Sorry, newbie move.

Hope this clears it up: www.businessinsider.com...



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
reply to post by baddmove
 


Iinteresting that Kos had a target on a picture of the Congresswoman, too and he scrubbed it out. Then there was a Democrat candidate that ran in Arizona and who lost who used a target sign during his campaign. In reality "having someone in your sights" is not unusual in American political expression at all. It is not literal, sweetheart.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by sara123123
 


Sorry honey but:







top topics



 
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join