jared lee loughner- errie comment on someones myspace page about a weird bird!

page: 108
109
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Ironclad
 


Naw I was just messing with you man


I spent last night reading through his ATS activity but haven't looked for any of his other post on other sites. Has anyone got links to his other comments or have they all been taken down?

Do you think Jared lee Loughner could be some kind of manchurian candidate?




posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Moonbeast1111
 


I brought up the angel Gabriel, and how sometimes he is portrayed as a woman. It got brushed right over though. I, however, think it's a damn good analogy.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by DeenUS
 

I get you now they could be trolling because i do remember checking the channel out and he favourited something 2 hours ago when loughner would of been locked up and someone on here i cant remember who probably the troll said "yer its deffinately him look at his beard it was the same as this other youtube profile" i cant remember which one but it checked out. But both videos could be a plant from a troll its earlier on in this thread ro far back to check but you might be onto something
edit on 11-1-2011 by JDofENGLAND because: spelling



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by IamAbeliever
I asked this question once before, many pages ago. If there really truly is something he is trying to tell us, could it be in one of his posts with the many numbers, and these are where we need to be looking? Or could the dude just be bat$hit crazy and we have all lost 3.5 days of our lives?




What is wrong or right with the current date?

How is the current date right or wrong?

Why is or isn't this the date?

When is or isn't the date ending or beginning?

Today is July 7th 2010.

Why is the year infinite in the date?

Example:
Today is July 7th 201062010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015 954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846 578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106 548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418 954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015 954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498548435784657841 51015954324841895498

This will or will not continue in year for how long?


What are the viewers thoughts of a infinite year?



And then this one:

If 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,098,601,978,618 is the year in B.C.E. then the previous year is 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,098,601,978,619 B.C.E.




The thing that I haven't seen people comment on is in the vid with the flag; toward the end he says "you didn't know B.C.E. isn't starting." Maybe this has something to do with the numbers as well.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


I was up all night after the shooting mostly on twitter, "Caitie Parker" was where a lot of info came from you can see the original tweets here twitter.com...



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by iamlizzyb

Originally posted by IamAbeliever
I asked this question once before, many pages ago. If there really truly is something he is trying to tell us, could it be in one of his posts with the many numbers, and these are where we need to be looking? Or could the dude just be bat$hit crazy and we have all lost 3.5 days of our lives?




What is wrong or right with the current date?

How is the current date right or wrong?

Why is or isn't this the date?

When is or isn't the date ending or beginning?

Today is July 7th 2010.

Why is the year infinite in the date?

Example:
Today is July 7th 201062010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015 954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846 578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106 548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418 954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015 954324841895498201065484357846578415101595432484189549820106548435784657841510159543248418954982010654843578465784151015954324841895498548435784657841 51015954324841895498

This will or will not continue in year for how long?


What are the viewers thoughts of a infinite year?



And then this one:

If 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,098,601,978,618 is the year in B.C.E. then the previous year is 987,123,478,961,876,341,234,098,601,978,619 B.C.E.




The thing that I haven't seen people comment on is in the vid with the flag; toward the end he says "you didn't know B.C.E. isn't starting." Maybe this has something to do with the numbers as well.
You saying that made me come up with something this could be hot. I think he means we or time dont exist because he want you to watch the video in reverse so that should be the first you see B.C.E isnt starting The only way B.C.E couldn't start is if time isnt real or if we don't exist
edit on 11-1-2011 by JDofENGLAND because: spelling



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by rushunt
 


LOL Ya I dont think I noticed anyone posting every five minutes. Especially not asking "have you found it yet". lol I sometimes feel like I am not on the same thread with everyone else. Especially when someone states something and everyone gets it but me. lol



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Abductee001
 


I actually took her name as the hint from oswego. Someone said it was the 2012 and how jll was obsessed with it. Hell who knows anymore. We need to get back to the basics. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a video of JLL taking off that mask, and Scooby, Shaggy and the gang all yelled, "Old man Withers, the amusement park operator?" And he replied, "I would have gotten away with it if it weren't for you meddling kids." Seriously, nothing would shock me right now.

Gee Scoob, back to the Mystery Machine.
he hee he hee he heee heee
edit on 11-1-2011 by IamAbeliever because: no reason



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by rushunt
 


Sorry that particular statement wasn't necessarily directed towards you. I have followed this thread for awhile now and have seen people bring this up numerous times without citing a reference or links to back it up. Just as I haven't seen anyone specifically link a screenshot or give links to the other sites you mentioned where it conclusively showed that the claim that Jared had a conversation with Giffords where she mentions her husband anywhere actually took place. Can you give links or screenshots of where and when these conversations took place? Can we document them? Even give us links to the other sites such as the tldr where the discussion might be taking place so that we might track down this elusive post?
edit on 11-1-2011 by AutOmatIc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by JDofENGLAND
 


Well if thats the case we should give it up now. There is NO WAY the human mind could ever grasp "We don't exsist". It would be something too far beyond. Shoot I know people who already "think" they believe that. lol



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by SHABBYCAT
 


thanks I didnt want to feel like a hack! LOL


The bce thinggy. you might be on to something.

i noticed in one of his rants it was about time and bc/ad

if you play it backwards mabee he ment it just stops. there is no seperation
no before jared/after jared
so what im trying to say is
time started and thats that. what happens happens
we say bc and ad and there is a point when jesus died that we mark it
he is saying that its really all just time and one if we dont recognise that then the flag is not real ?

I think



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by IamAbeliever
 


Oh goodness lol thats spot on. I also think we need to kind of start over , fresh if you will. Without the stain of the op. The entire thread is mucked up.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


absolutely it is gonna take a bit though I have searched through so much I cant remmeber all of it... give me a min



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by SHABBYCAT
 


I'm not say that but time wise B.C.E come first so for that to not start time in his mind maybe isn't real or doesn't exist or maybe where not real or do not exist im talking about in his mind maybe thats what drove him crazy
edit on 11-1-2011 by JDofENGLAND because: spelling



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:02 PM
link   
Can somebody give me a quick run down of what you guys have found out about Mr Loughner? I got here late and don't want to wade through all the pages and the mis-steps.

Also what are you guys all trying to decifer?


edit on 11-1-2011 by strangleholder1 because: what



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by JDofENGLAND
 


Ya thats kinda what I meant , it would drive ANYONE crazy. I get what your saying tho. I mean literally anything at this point could fit. weve been thru the gammut in mt opinion.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
Or the whole "B.C.E isn't starting". Could B.C.E. be an abbreviation for something different altogether? Maybe it was an abbreviation for some type of operation and he was trying to get word out that it wasn't time yet. I am grasping at straws now. Something about his whole demeanor just doesn't make sense. Besides the obvious I mean.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   
I suggest mods close this thread, Oswego can make up a new story err thread about his house being raided, etc.

Put up or shut up Oswego, we're done playing blue's clues......



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:09 PM
link   
reply to post by I.C. Weiner
 


I personally don't think we will ever see oswego again. Not under that account at least. I think he has been in here since he mysteriously vanished, but just under a different account.



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:09 PM
link   
Two things really quick

1. I'm reasonably certain that the youtube account ThGreatPiniter isn't JLL. Done a lot of digging today, and I think it's very highly likely it (and the FB account Pintopia) belongs to the poster "Pintsized" at the world of warcraft website thetldr.com. Pintsized can't be JLL, as he's been posting today at that site re: the shootings. In the video where thegreatpiniter talks about oombis and tidlers, he even says people have said to him "Pintsized, we want it to be normal..." or something like that. At any rate, he mentions himself as "Pintsized", a member who has been posting at that site even today. I don't recall how we got the connection from JLL to that account, but I believe it's bunk.

2. The blog. Unless it was a blog owned by Gabby Giffords, there's no way to know it was her arguing with JLL in the comments section of it. Obviously we have a couple JLL handles like classitup10 and starhitshnaz. Therefore, if one of those, or maybe part of his name were used in a comment left before last Saturday, there could be a reasonable assumption he typed it. However, even if someone used Giffords name in their comments, there's no reason to think it was really her. I doubt many congresspeople spend much time arguing on blogs, and I really doubt they would divulge the sort of information that was supposedly in that one. Much, much, much more likely would be someone lying about who they are, or what they know. Therefore, I also believe the blog is bunk. When the poster oswego was originally commenting about it, he said it was between 2 people, one who called themself "cash_itup" and another who called themself "gibbs2". I think in his excitement at causing a stir, he forgot that JLL used "CLASSitup", not cash, and that Gabby's last name is Giffords, not Gibbs.

Hope this post helps people not rack their brain looking for things that are either unrelated or nonexistant.





top topics
 
109
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join