BREAKING Gabrielle Giffords Shot: Congresswoman Reportedly Shot In Arizona [UPDATED]

reply to post by wisdomnotemotion


WOW!!

Whoever wrote that ad knows about suggestion and hypnosis. That ad is full of embedded suggestions.

"Help remove Gabrille Giffords from office. Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly"

Is it any surprise that it sounds like the shooter had an automatic rife?

Was this ad repeated anywhere else?

She is married to Navy Capt. Mark Kelly, a NASA astronaut who is scheduled to lead a space shuttle mission to the International Space Station.

Wow her huband is suppose to be going into space!!!

Man I bet he feels helpless..

Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
reply to post by Nephalim

 

You wouldnt take up arms against a government that has removed your liberties?

Good thing the founding fathers didnt think like you

Its a damn good thing they didnt think like you either.

Originally posted by mydarkpassenger
Boon, it was March 30, 1981

crap, ur right, my bad.
that date looked odd to me
when I was typing it, now I know why.
thanks for the clarification.
I changed it in the original post

reply to post by projectvxn


Innocent? Far from.

She wished to disarm you and I.

Gabby Giffords supported Banning the sale or transfer of semi-automatic guns, except those used for hunting.

Source

Originally posted by Nephalim


Its a damn good thing they didnt think like you either.

Yea, youre right.

Good thing the Revolutionary War never happened huh?

reply to post by BigTimeCheater


That doesn't matter to me.

She has the right to life as much as I do.

The Free market of ideas has anti-gunners running for the hills
with their ideology. That's why congress didn't put gun-control
on the docket during the whole 111th, and the 112th won't either.

There was NO REASON AT ALL for this.

And I LOVE my guns.

reply to post by BigTimeCheater


Shooting people who favor arms control probably isn't the best way to approach these things. After all, it kind of validates their point.

~Heff

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by mydarkpassenger
Boon, it was March 30, 1981

crap, ur right, my bad.
that date looked odd to me
when I was typing it, now I know why.
thanks for the clarification.
I changed it in the original post

LOL. Us old guys gotta hang together!

reply to post by thisguyrighthere


The health care take over bill was very edgy and she added fuel to the fires by going out full blast, race baiting all her opponents as racists and nazis, etc. God rest her soul, she was a radical who grossly violated the constitution with fascist leglislation she did not even read and then joined the radical bandwangon, barking at her opponents with typical left wing racial slurs. That was a disaster.

That said, we don't know why this nut shot her. Just wanted to disagree that she was not edgy. She was. What a shame.

Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
reply to post by Kaploink

 

Armed or not, she is part of a corrupt group of criminals known as the United States Congress.

Elected to office by WE THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply to post by projectvxn


I am of the opinion that when one attempts to restrict, or take away the liberties of others, they forfeit their right to life.

While it's sad on a personal level for her family, hopefully this could possibly be a wake up call to other Congress tyrants.

reply to post by BigTimeCheater


I am sorry, there is simply no justification for it. You can argue all you want about how evil the government is, but it will never make such an action moral or right.

Originally posted by Sinnthia


Elected to office by WE THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Allegedly.

With all of the news of vote fraud, and irregularities, there is no reason to believe each and every vote is counted, or each and every election is valid.

Originally posted by Kaploink
reply to post by BigTimeCheater

 

I am sorry, there is simply no justification for it. You can argue all you want about how evil the government is, but it will never make such an action moral or right.

Thats your opinion.

Morals are subjective, so lets not bother debating them.

We can agree to disagree.

Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by BigTimeCheater

 

Shooting people who favor arms control probably isn't the best way to approach these things. After all, it kind of validates their point.

~Heff

But it does remove them from the decision making process

It does not matter if you dislike someone or a politician is does not give you a right to shoot them..

It wasn't like this women barged on someones property trying to break in their house...

Shooting confirmed as somewhere between 4 - 8 people have been shot. Rep. Giffords is amongst the victims. Conflicting reports put her between critical to dead.

If she dies dude will get a needle in the arm as that is Felony Assassination which allows the Federal Govt to take the case from the state as the state is unable to handle this.

I don't think this was a cartel hit, they usually use multiple gunmen, grenades, etc. It's more than likely that this was a random nut and the usual anti-gun nutcases will be crawling out of the woodwork in the coming months to try and further limit our right to bear arms - even though the shooter's weapons were probably already illegal, and he probably had some mental illness that already prohibits him from owning guns.

This guy is so screwed... He would probably prefer death over being in prison FOREVER!!