It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amperage
Just setting foot in one of those places controlled by a "home owners association" is asking for your rights to be trampled on.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by captaintyinknots
What law in its entirety do you claim? You keep referring the " state law", but haven't put down one in specific. Care to? Or do you plan on arguing with nothing but smoke?
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by captaintyinknots
What law in its entirety do you claim? You keep referring the " state law", but haven't put down one in specific. Care to? Or do you plan on arguing with nothing but smoke?
The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Ok time out.....( taking a step back ), state rights have no jurisdiction over a presiding HOA.
10 Amendment:
The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
But this is not a state issue. This is a private organization implementing rules against persons. So with this known fact, and yes the owner new the bylaws rules, it still does not negate the laws of the Congress which passed the Flag act.
Now, with that, it clearly states that the hanging of a flag will not be abridged. Further, the Article 3 and 4 dont specifically identify the restrictions of a residential HOA. It does, very slightly address the condominium assoc. But that is not the case here. This is a residential home.
With that, this case may in fact abridge the right of this homeowner. My argument has been the same, that the Congressional law passed in regards to hanging a flag, supersedes a private organizations rules(bylaws). That has been my argument. That the Congressional law supersedes a HOA law. Period.
SEC. 3. RIGHT TO DISPLAY THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. A condominium association, cooperative association, or residential real estate management association may not adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement, that would restrict or prevent a member of the association from displaying the flag of the United States on residential property within the association with respect to which such member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by Dilligaf28
First off, if you really believe that all funds acquired form HOA dues is only redirected into the community, your sorely mistaken. You don't honestly believe it costs 16k to utilize the drip system for plants monthly due you?
2nd, though you both make good arguments the problem still remains.
SEC. 3. RIGHT TO DISPLAY THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. A condominium association, cooperative association, or residential real estate management association may not adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement, that would restrict or prevent a member of the association from displaying the flag of the United States on residential property within the association with respect to which such member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.
Take note, where it states " may not adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement that would restrict or prevent a member of the association from displaying the flag of the United States on residential property within the association'. The home owner in question would fall under " such member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.".
That what Im trying to say anyways.
edit on 7-1-2011 by Whereweheaded because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Its not an argument on whether he can or cant. The HOA is putting a stipulation on the size of the pole. But reverting back to Article 3, states that there will be no abridgment. Nor any rules, to enforce, nor obstruct from the hanging of the flag. Hanging of the flag would curtail the pole included.