It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Close Encounter over the Nazca lines in Peru (video) HD 1080P filmd 1 jan 2011

page: 2
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 10:46 AM
OP review this link , footage from Peru, the last part ties in with your post!

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 10:51 AM
Somewhere, some hoaxers are laughing at ATS right now.

This has got to be one of the most pathetic videos I've ever seen, concerning "UFOs".

OP, you should be ashamed.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 10:53 AM
Don't even bother watching.. this must be the worst UFO video I've ever seen.

Just don't. Save the anger, disappointment and the 5 minutes.
I wanna shoot someone now just for watching it..

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 11:07 AM
Yet another example of someone confusing "100% undeniable proof" with "I believe".

That could have been anything, and you cannot enhance a digital image beyond it's pixels, there's no hidden detail in a digital image, it's not film.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 11:08 AM
I don't understand why film the cloud for so long to begin with. The video seems to be a start and stop as they fly over the various lines? Did the pilot have some kind of radar contact and we didn't here it mentioned on the audio? I just don't get filming the clouds going by. (I know "film" is a misnomer).

I will go along with hole in the clouds or a just a hoax.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 11:15 AM
Gianormous FAIL!!

I want to see craft with aliens peeking out windows!!


posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 11:31 AM
this video was really lousy!!!! Nothing to see here, as in NOTHING!!!! these clips just keep frustrates me.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 11:38 AM
Ive watched the video. Its HD ,but the still frames at the end are the most mind boggling

This was my first line of the thread, and still i am being attacked?
I even said that i believe that it is an hoax, The still frames are to well defined I typed .

This is my first and last UFO thread, I burnt myself on this topic.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 12:09 PM
Well that was an anti-climax!

Look, even the title of the video says it all '100% PROOF OF UFO's' or whatever, that immediately makes me not want to watch it.

Cutting to the chase, the video was s**t and i saw no evidence for anything. I'm starting to think people post crap like this just to get a reaction ,whether it be a bad one or a good one.

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 02:41 PM
It is a hole in the clouds...

posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 03:52 PM

Originally posted by RamsOnTop
Seriously? This is evidence? C'mon people, I want irrefutable evidence just as much as the next guy but this is nothing. It's a damn blur.

How about this from Peru (yesterday?) then?

I WISH it didn't have that translation banner smack in the middle because this looks very interesting especially if the claims was rotating.

I'll see if this merits any attention here before I start a thread on it. Let me know what you think.

Oh, and OPs video is mentioned in this one as well (so I don't want OP to think I was stealing his/her thunder)


posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 03:16 PM
Wow, everyone is so rude. The OP mentioned that he's not very sure of it. And the person who uploaded the video said its 100% PROOF in the title...not the OP, give him some slack, he just found it interesting.

posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 03:40 PM

Originally posted by RamsOnTop
Seriously? This is evidence? C'mon people, I want irrefutable evidence just as much as the next guy but this is nothing. It's a damn blur.


How pathetic.

I appreciate being able to see the nazca lines from their view and all..
but c'mon..
this is ridiculous.

Thanks for sharing, OP..
it's the youtuber who posted it that needs to be locked away. lol
edit on 27-1-2011 by Ahmose because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 03:44 PM
reply to post by Human_Alien

You can turn the banner off if you click the arrow on the player and disable the red caption icon

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 02:02 PM
Please could anyone answer or is it just me.
Is there a some noise interference on 3:28, just when "object" starts to appear?

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 02:09 PM
It's ambiguous really. If you think it's a break in the thinnish cloud, there were earlier breaks. If you think it's a McMinniville type UFO rising then descending in cloud, then it does that admirably. There seems to be several frames that hold a structured shape intact. The animated GIF in the other thread implies a transient image in the later images used, or it could be that the structure really is descending and is being recovered in cloud in a none uniform way.

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 02:12 PM
Its part of the clouds coming over the horizon.

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 02:13 PM
This thread is the first existing thread on this topic. There is a duplicate thread (here) that was started, but closed. There are some replies by others on there including replies by Owner SkepticOverlord. May want to check it out for reference.

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 03:43 PM

A pressure wave of some sort.

Or do you want me to go into the pressure (sound) waves from Radio operated the Tesla way.
Tesla: only intelligent being to make a space ship.
Your opinions or elucidations always accepted.

posted on Jan, 28 2011 @ 04:57 PM
Very desperate indeed lol

100% proof my arse

I would'nt even bother wasting your time to watch the video to be honest, there in no proof of anything except for people having wild imaginations.

Im no most on here...but its clearly either a break in the cloud cover or some sort of condensation causing the illusion of something in the cloud.

new topics

top topics

<< 1    3  4 >>

log in