It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
but security in the past has proven to lack.
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
This is going to benefit G. W. Bush immensely in his war on terrorism campaign.
It'll benefit him by keeping him in power, possibly suspending the elections and in the meantime creating the next Country where the terrorist attack originated from. For example, it will not be Afghanistan or Iraq this time, but a different Country that they'll pin the blame on.
Originally posted by TrickmastertricK
I allways thought this to. But, How? I am looking at it as, hey wait a minute, you spent all this money, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, Put the Patriot Act in effect, well maybe you are not the right one for the job. He has claimed that America is a safer place from those who want to harm us, yet we could allow another attack?
Originally posted by titian
Trick, how many stolen/lost trucks/tankers/etc have eventually been recovered though? I'm not sure about the ones from NJ but I thought the TX ones were recovered less than a week later.
Or, were these all tests to see how easy it could be done prior to the real event?
Originally posted by daedenfach
Wouldn't it make more sense to stage a 'foiled' attack plot? You know hype it up that there will be an attack and then rah rah rah for Homeland Security and Bush if the world gets to watch them roll with a plan to 'foil it' just in the nick of time?
Sure there is alot of room for error with this sort of thing but it could happen.
That would not work in favour of the Bush regime. I think there are a lot of those that we don't know about, so something like stopping a terror attack from happening wouldn't do much.
Originally posted by daedenfach
Wouldn't it make more sense to stage a 'foiled' attack plot?
From a different perspective on the Madrid Bombings: I've read that this terror attack was supposed to have the desired effect of getting the people of Spain to become 'Patriotic' against the terrorists and to keep the current Government at that time in power, much the same way Americans became after 9/11. But, it did not, as the Spanish people did not fall for this terror attack that was plotted by the Intelligence Agencies and so Spain's people got rid of that Government.
Originally posted by TrickmastertricK
IMMORTAL:
I agree with what you have said, as I said before I thought this way, i'm trying to look at it from a different angle. The Madrid Bombings changed the election. The took the FOR the war on terror out of power and put in the government that is there now, who is less aggressive against the war on terror. I'm wondering if it could have the same ramifications here. If they took out the Bush Admin, the next would not be as Strong against this.
[edit on 8-7-2004 by TrickmastertricK]