It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tgidkp
Originally posted by Quadrivium
..... It is about our over reaching government.....
edit to add:
HA! two posts ago you were pleading with people to see beyond religion. and yet in your above response to beezzer you are right back into it yourself.
pffffft. you would like to think that your are making some kind of grand statement about whats wrong with the world. but the joke is on YOU.edit on 7-1-2011 by tgidkp because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tgidkp
Originally posted by Quadrivium
..... It is about our over reaching government.....
nope. it is about your personal definition of "over reaching" which implicitly involves whatever is being reached-across. (a cross!)
edit to add:
HA! two posts ago you were pleading with people to see beyond religion. and yet in your above response to beezzer you are right back into it yourself.
pffffft. you would like to think that your are making some kind of grand statement about whats wrong with the world. but the joke is on YOU.edit on 7-1-2011 by tgidkp because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by beezzer
Well said and thank you bezzer.
I am sure that this ruling has a lot of support from those whom do not see themselves as being "religious" and from any not of the Christian faith.
They were supported in this ruling and this ruling, like those before it, is a step.
With each supported step we come closer to the future rulings that you may not support. But by that time your support will not be wanted or needed.
Now it is all things "Christian". What is next?
My friend,
When I walked with Wiccans, nude through a public park, where were you to support me?
When I smoked cannabis with a medicine man, where were you to support me?
When I plead the case of the Muslims to erect their mosque where they see fit, where were you?
When I marched with the gay and lesbian protestors to grant them the right to marry, where were you?
edit on 7-1-2011 by IAMIAM because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
I was standing right next to you, my brother. I always am and always will.
Originally posted by beezzer
What I do understand is that it is not a true indication of freedom and the respect thereof, if you just stand with those to whom you agree with.
That's easy.
Standing with those who you DON'T agree with, to express the same freedoms, is the hard part. But I will fight just as strongly for your rights as I would anyone elses.
Even if I don't agree.
Peace.
My friend,
When I walked with Wiccans, nude through a public park, where were you to support me?
When I smoked cannabis with a medicine man, where were you to support me?
When I plead the case of the Muslims to erect their mosque where they see fit, where were you?
When I marched with the gay and lesbian protestors to grant them the right to marry, where were you?
It would seem that Christians have time and again been afforded the chance to stand up against oppression, yet chose not to because they were the oppressors.
So, now I think you will find the meaning of...
You reap what you sow.
And of course, if the shoe doesn't fit, do not put it on.
With Love,
Your Brother
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by beezzer
I have stated close to the same many times in other threads. We as a nation have become politically correct to a fault.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
I must admit,
I was not standing with you.
Nor was I standing in your way.
I may not agree with all life styles but I can not judge. Live your life in the way you see fit and I will do the same. I can cast no stones because I am not perfect nor claim to be.
Our constitution is being twisted in order for those stones to be cast though. This is the point I was trying to make with the thread.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
If anything, this shows us what is RIGHT in our country. We operate by a rule of law and the laws must be enforced. Enforcing the First Amendment preserves everyone's freedom.
The article claims the cross must simply be modified to not convey an endorsement of religion.
I know a lot of you think that christianity and it's paraphernalia (crucifixes, crosses, etc) are super nifty, but they do NOT belong in areas funded by the taxpayers.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by beezzer
I have stated close to the same many times in other threads. We as a nation have become politically correct to a fault.
Political Correctness, has been one of the best tools, one of the most effective tools in destroying our Constitution.
I only hope more people wake up before it is too late.
Originally posted by beezzer
So it'd be okay if funded by private sources, right?
For several end time prophecies to be fulfilled, the temple will have to be rebuilt.
Revelation 11:2 "Leave out the court which is outside the temple and do not measure it, for it has been given to the nations; and they will tread under foot the oly city for forty-two months."
Daniel 9:27 "And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolation, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate."
Daniel 9:26 "Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary."
Some archeologists believe that the temple mount is actually 340 feet south of the Dome of the Rock site, putting the Dome of the Rock within the Court of the Gentiles. This may be the court outside the temple that is left out.
There are many groups already working on preparations for the new temple. The blueprints are already done, the temple garments have been made, and there have already been attempts to lay the cornerstone of the temple. The only thing standing in the way of the construction of the new temple is Islam's third holiest site, the Dome of the Rock and government support for such an undertaking. Some possible scenarios for the rebuilding of the temple are as follows:
1. The persuasion and performing of miracles by the Antichrist and False Prophet convinces the Islamic world to approve the rebuilding.
2. The United Nations will negotiate the rebuilding of the temple following a war with the armies from the North (Russia and Islamic forces). This assumes that the war with the armies from the North is not the battle of Armageddon as some feel and that this attack occurs before the rapture or tribulation period begins. The supernatural destruction of the Russian army and Islamic forces will cause an outpouring of Christian worship and zeal amongst the Jewish people who will reconstruct the temple.
3. It is determined that the site of the first two temples is actually south of the Dome of the Rock, and the court of the gentiles (Dome of the Rock) will be left out of the 3rd temple.
A group in Israel called the Temple Mount Faithful have obtained most of the clothing, instruments and other equipment required for temple worship and are actively preparing for the laying of the third temple's cornerstone.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Why? Don't christains pay taxes? Aren't they allowed to express freely?