It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by Vicky32
Well I dont know that anyone has said that a christian could be like a follower of Ayn. Most christians dont know who she was or anything about her...like 99%. The OPs supposition here started off as if the issue was to be examined in light of some popular christain following. But i can tell you there is no great following at all of Rand with christains at large. But even if this was not the OPs thing making a post about christains following Rand is about like saying good christains dont follow ...fill in the blank.
This thread gives the idea that Christians do and so as we tear Rand apart we make christians look like debased fools.
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by Vicky32
Well I dont know that anyone has said that a christian could be like a follower of Ayn. Most christians dont know who she was or anything about her...like 99%. The OPs supposition here started off as if the issue was to be examined in light of some popular christain following. But i can tell you there is no great following at all of Rand with christains at large. But even if this was not the OPs thing making a post about christains following Rand is about like saying good christains dont follow ...fill in the blank.
This thread gives the idea that Christians do and so as we tear Rand apart we make christians look like debased fools.
It's really difficult for me to work out exactly what point you're making, but it seems to me that there's a fundamental disagreement I have with both you and the OP! There are, it seems from ATS, 300 million Right Wing Christians in the USA. That's just insane to me. Right wing thought in it's entirety (not to mention Right Objectivism and there's no other kind) is incompatible with Christianity.
To me, Christians must be pacifist (most Americans aren't, even if they're not RW) and socialist which is where I thought the OP was coming from, but as I have read the thread I have seen her agreeing with you that Rand's characters are moral. As Rand herself would have said "the hell" they are!
V.
Originally posted by Vicky32
reply to post by Logarock
Don't you even get that the cursing of the fig tree is an acted parable? It has nothing to do with literally wanting literal fruit to eat!
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by antonia
Anyway I read what you posted. Many parts of it look to be pure spin and out of context cherry picking to support the position. Not taking up for Rand here but she is a person that many see a need in destroying. Making her out as someone lionizing a killer just brings up the flags and would have to be looked at a bit more than the info you provide here. Your style is boring and Sophomorish.
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by Vicky32
Well I dont know that anyone has said that a christian could be like a follower of Ayn. Most christians dont know who she was or anything about her...like 99%. The OPs supposition here started off as if the issue was to be examined in light of some popular christain following. But i can tell you there is no great following at all of Rand with christains at large. But even if this was not the OPs thing making a post about christains following Rand is about like saying good christains dont follow ...fill in the blank.
This thread gives the idea that Christians do and so as we tear Rand apart we make christians look like debased fools.
It's really difficult for me to work out exactly what point you're making, but it seems to me that there's a fundamental disagreement I have with both you and the OP! There are, it seems from ATS, 300 million Right Wing Christians in the USA. That's just insane to me. Right wing thought in it's entirety (not to mention Right Objectivism and there's no other kind) is incompatible with Christianity.
To me, Christians must be pacifist (most Americans aren't, even if they're not RW) and socialist which is where I thought the OP was coming from, but as I have read the thread I have seen her agreeing with you that Rand's characters are moral. As Rand herself would have said "the hell" they are!
V.
My point is there is nothing to shoot at. There isnt any Rand following in christanity unless you believe somehow 300 million "Right Wing Christains" have been sold a Rand model without them knowing it, Rand in other terms.
And christans must be pacifists....where you getting this? It certainly has something to do with the type of application of force. But even at this, whiel the christain is thought to be required to refrain from using phisical that dosent mean they cant be a force in social and political issues.
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Vicky32
reply to post by Logarock
Don't you even get that the cursing of the fig tree is an acted parable? It has nothing to do with literally wanting literal fruit to eat!
Yes and that was my point. He still wanted something and didnt find it so he cursed the "tree". If He were so applicabel to the reasoning why didnt he "bless" the poor tree with fruit?
Originally posted by badgerprints
You know,
This kind of crap gets old after a while.
Christians + Ayn Rand = Hypocrite...............right?
Wrong.
Taking absolutes from two separate ideologies and throwing away all common ground between the two to point out a conflict in thinking is simply another game of semantics. It's just another thread designed to point your finger at another and say "You're wrong. I'm right."
edit on 26-1-2011 by badgerprints because: spellin
Originally posted by Vicky32
IMO, Christian pacifism is the way to go! The early church was always pacifist, and that is the ideal...
Mennonite view on CP
Wikipedia view
Specifically about 9/11
Yes, you're right, Christians can be a force in social/cultural issues - but not violent physical force!
Vicky
Originally posted by badgerprints
You know,
This kind of crap gets old after a while.
Christians + Ayn Rand = Hypocrite...............right?
Wrong.
Taking absolutes from two separate ideologies and throwing away all common ground between the two to point out a conflict in thinking is simply another game of semantics. It's just another thread designed to point your finger at another and say "You're wrong. I'm right."
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Vicky32
reply to post by Logarock
Don't you even get that the cursing of the fig tree is an acted parable? It has nothing to do with literally wanting literal fruit to eat!
Yes and that was my point. He still wanted something and didnt find it so he cursed the "tree". If He were so applicabel to the reasoning why didnt he "bless" the poor tree with fruit?
Because the parable was about the people! They were not bearing the fruit they were required to do....
Vicky
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
In part, her works appear motivated by an aggressive anti-Christian rebellion and intollerance.
Ayn Rand's philosophy is abhorrent to the Christian.
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Vicky32
IMO, Christian pacifism is the way to go! The early church was always pacifist, and that is the ideal...
Mennonite view on CP
Wikipedia view
Specifically about 9/11
Yes, you're right, Christians can be a force in social/cultural issues - but not violent physical force!
Vicky
Well you will excuse me if I am in no hurry to get feed to the lions.
Originally posted by Logarock
Didnt I just say something like that? But no it wasnt about bearing fruit like some sort of requirement...dont let money here frost your understanding... Jesus wasnt collecting money. The fruit or lack there of represented the nations reception of Him. He came to His own and they knew Him not so He blew the place up 70 years later. That whole deal there dosent sound like soup kitchen Jesus. Why didnt He just let it go, be cool, turn the other cheek ect, set up a ministry for the homeless or something. Who did He think he was that His people should have understood Him anyway? Why didnt He just get with the program like a good citizen, bring something to the table, get into something larger than self? Oh no He cursed the place and then blew it up.edit on 26-1-2011 by Logarock because: ex
Originally posted by Vicky32
Originally posted by Logarock
Didnt I just say something like that? But no it wasnt about bearing fruit like some sort of requirement...dont let money here frost your understanding... Jesus wasnt collecting money. The fruit or lack there of represented the nations reception of Him. He came to His own and they knew Him not so He blew the place up 70 years later. That whole deal there dosent sound like soup kitchen Jesus. Why didnt He just let it go, be cool, turn the other cheek ect, set up a ministry for the homeless or something. Who did He think he was that His people should have understood Him anyway? Why didnt He just get with the program like a good citizen, bring something to the table, get into something larger than self? Oh no He cursed the place and then blew it up.edit on 26-1-2011 by Logarock because: ex
Who said anything about money? I certainly didn't!
"The fruit or lack there of represented the nations reception of Him. "
I disagree, it wasn't about that so much, as their obedience to the knowledge they already had...
He didn't set up ministries for the homeless etc, because he knew his time was too short for that, he left that to us, his followers.
The blowing up was pretty much going to happen anyway, because of the the inevitable rebellion of the Jewish people against the Romans. Jesus knew it was coming, he didn't cause it.
He came to teach, but he knew what would happen to him for the crime of telling people to "be excellent to one another".
Vicky
Originally posted by Logarock
But this is not why He was killed. As far as being excellent that includes reproof and rebuke...with all longsuffering naturally.