It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO. NASA says it’s space junk.

page: 4
13
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:54 AM
link   
Ok I think I might be getting carried away here but I found this on 2382




I do not know the time difference between the pictures or why the picture in between did showed nothing.




posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 06:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by RUSSO
reply to post by JimOberg
 





something truly extraordinary and useful to find out


The only thing I can say here is that you are extraordinary truly blind. Sorry if my answer was negative. But thanks anyway.



You say this after looking at the links I provided?

Or did you deliberately avoid looking at them?

My eyes and mind are open to any factual criticisms of them you care to offer.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 06:21 AM
link   
reply to post by JimOberg
 


Hey Jim!


Fancy meeting you here!


Thanks for the links. I'm going to check those out.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 08:57 AM
link   
when is nasa tell the truth abaut ufos?
never.
they lie all the time abaut almost everything.
maybe this is ufo maybe is not,if it is ufo nasa wil say is not,when ufo is subject nasa is last place where u need to check what they say abaut it.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   
I think it's pretty clear that it's swamp gas.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:59 AM
link   
looks like frost creeping along a window (or lens) to me. Too bad the image is not in 3D.

Can water exist in a liquid state in space? I didn't think so, but maybe a sun ray hit a ice particle or maybe the equipment itself gave off a little moisture retained from Earth... Dunno....

Does this item appear on any of the other photos from the same strip of film?

Never the less, it is a rather odd artifact... Nice.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 11:49 AM
link   
I did not read entire thread, but did anyone else think of the crystalline entity when they saw op's pic??



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by JimOberg
Amazing footwork, Zorg.


I assume you missed this post then?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



reply to post by The Shrike

I assume you missed this post then?
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
You mean to tell me that out of the billions of dollars NASA spends nobody thought to buy a couple hundred dollar digital camera to negate the problems of rolled film?



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 08:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by JimOberg
Amazing footwork, Zorg.


I assume you missed this post then?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



reply to post by The Shrike

I assume you missed this post then?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



Yes, I did. I got tired of reading ridiculous replies so I cut it short to submit mine. At least members can see that there are at least 2 intelligent people on this thread!



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 08:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by illuminateme
You mean to tell me that out of the billions of dollars NASA spends nobody thought to buy a couple hundred dollar digital camera to negate the problems of rolled film?

Now I think this is weird too, something's up and NASA I feel has something in hiding.
Who knows besides anti gravity tech what they got...
This isn't space junk at all I can imagine this much! how the hell could something take such a form?



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 08:46 PM
link   
They look like x-ray images to me, the first smaller object looks like a spine.



posted on Jan, 9 2011 @ 10:27 PM
link   
reply to post by The Shrike
 


The Shrike and Jim Oberg = the "intelligent and rational skeptics".

I sometimes wonder why you both keep on posting here - it must feel like hitting your head on the wall over and over again. It must take such patience to keep on coming back. You obviously both feel... obligated to do so.


edit on 9-1-2011 by corsair00 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
13
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join