It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Debunking Misconceptions About the Electric Universe

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 30 2011 @ 09:44 PM
From this video a few more notes:

Black Holes Plasma Cosmology Electric Universe Astronomy

---Electromagnetic processes also explain the enigma of GRO J1655-40, which displays an 'unexpected' flickering – some 450 times a second. Well, unexpected, that is, by the laws of gravitation.

---Additionally, plasma scientissts can now replicate the evolution of galactic structures both experimentally and in computer simulations, without resorting to fictional Black Holes – working, instead with well-tested electromagnetic principles.

---”Middleweight black holes roam the galaxy undetected” [New Scientist. 10Th Jan-2008]

Because they have failed to find Black Holes of the little and the large variety, astronomers have now started searching for middleweights.

This should guarantee them many more millions in future funding. The funding bodies seem quite happy to poor millions of dollars of tax payers money into this particular black hole!

---If you are interested how the math behind the black holes has actually been falsified, try a Google for Stephen J. Crothers- Black Hole Math.

And from this one.

The Big Bang from a Plasma Perspective

---In the beginning there was nothing......which exploded! --Terry Pratchett

---they say that the strength of a scientific theory lies in its ability to make predictions. This presents a problem for the BBT- It has failed to make any successful predictions!

---Futhermore, the BBT violates one of the best-tested laws of physics – the conservation of energy and matter, since it produces energy and matter at a titanic rate out of nothingness.

To ignore this basic law would never be acceptable in any other field of physics.

Halton Arp is often described as The Modern Day Gallileo. He wrote the classic 'Seeing Red' about the controversy.

He was denied observatory time in the US after daring to question expansion models, and moved to work at the Max Planck Institute in Germany.

---The Black Hole controversy.

Hannes Alfven theorised that central radio sources and emerging jets which have long been observed can be explained by plasma processes.

Evidently there is no need for a black hole at galactic centers to generate such energy because trapped magnetic energy, squeezed by the pinch effect can do the trick more efficiently.

---Unfortunately, very few mainstream scientists take courses in plasma and electrodynamics, and even fewer read the pertinent jouranlas. The mainstream view for the most part, is that electricity plays no significant role in space!

Many Big Bangers display a religious devotion to their theory which is perhaps not surprising given its religious motivations.....

Hitting on the right answer is very positive because everything starts to fall into place.

I was viewing some interesting back yard attempts unite Tesla coils with HHO production, and its seems the Coil discharged or shorted in the water, the beautiful colors of the plasma just took me by surprise. A miniature glimpse at the cosmos in container of water.

As above so below really seems to apply.

Also the corrupt ways that science seem wedded to creationists and to dogma, even when theories are seriously flawed.

Pictures that say it all, pretty much. The Cosmos is threaded with filaments.

edit on 30-7-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 30 2011 @ 10:05 PM
They usually wed Quantum Holographic Universe models with string theory, black holes, and conventional. But its actually a good fit for the Electric Universe as well. Its my belief we're in both a Holographic Universe, much like this and its Electric in principal. There is energy, and its always been there. Its holographically acting upon energy and elctrical interactions, plasma, ultimately photons. Input system, stars/light. And that is a better fit.

posted on Jul, 31 2011 @ 07:37 AM
reply to post by RadicalRebel

Ideas exist, evidence or proof does not.

posted on Jul, 31 2011 @ 01:59 PM

Originally posted by masterp
reply to post by RadicalRebel

Ideas exist, evidence or proof does not.

Yes, thats the basis for a "theory"
tell me which "theory" you ascribe to and what evidence or proof causes you to beleive in that particular "theory"

Aside from that there is enough "evidence" in this thread alone to make a credible argument for EU. True that may not be PROOF but tell me, where is the PROOF of string "theory" or M-"theory" or even the "theory" of relativity....

not to demean your beleifs but without further information to support your ideas, your argument is weak...

posted on Dec, 3 2012 @ 09:13 AM
reply to post by mnemeth1

You are absolutely brilliant. I love your articles, and thank you for bringing such great material to ATS.

Always appreciated, star and flag

posted on Dec, 3 2012 @ 10:25 AM
Will we hear from any credible scientists about the EU? For some reason they steer clear from it.

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in