Coming soon to a parking lot near you., page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 5-1-2011 @ 07:53 PM by FortAnthem
The green police Nazis are gonna have a field day with this. They're already going up in Florida.

Right now, its bad enough walking past all those empty Handicapped parking spots, next we'll have to walk past dozens of empty rows of these to get to the store. What a workout!



"Green" Companies Assign Priority "Hybrid-Only" Parking

In yet another effort to “go green," a number of businesses in Orlando, Florida, have assigned priority parking — similar to handicapped parking – to drivers of hybrid vehicles.

The Blaze writes:
An increasing number of Orlando buildings and venues are instituting front-row hybrid-only parking spaces in an attempt to earn "green" building status and reward car owners considered environmentally friendly. Places like the University of Central Florida, Ikea in South Orlando, and the Amway Center are just a few who are giving hybrids preferential treatment.

Florida’s SunSentinel.com snipes:

As though owners of hybrid vehicles aren’t imperious enough with their 50-plus miles to the gallon, green-construction proponents are now reserving front-row parking spaces for such drivers at a growing number of buildings.

As of now, the hybrid parking spots are not going to be policed for violators, so defenders of the parking spaces are hopeful that the public will comply amicably.

Jon Ippel, Orlando’s sustainability manager, states, “Right now this is a promotional thing, so I don’t think we’re seeing enforcement. It’s more peer pressure. Hopefully, the evil eyes violators get will force them to comply.”

Critics of the green parking spaces view them as preferential treatment for more affluent drivers who are able to afford the increased costs of hybrid vehicles. Alexa Stone, program manager for ecoPreserve LLC, an Orlando consulting firm, remarks, “I have heard that some people don’t like it because they question whether it’s fair. They think hybrids are expensive and elitist.”

The New American


Sure it's only a peer pressure thing right now but, how long before our ever more liberal brainwashed legislatures put some teeth into those signs and we start getting tickets for parking there?

The critics have a point too; nobody can afford these things but the wealthy. Either all those spots will go to waste like the overabundance of handicapped spots or they will become special privileged parking spaces for the wealthy only, another way for them to lord it over us commoners.

I can't wait 'till they go up in my area so I can park my smelly old Expedition in the very first "Green Only" spot, right up near the front of the building.
edit on 1/5/11 by FortAnthem because:



reply posted on 5-1-2011 @ 08:31 PM by FortAnthem
reply to post by thecinic



Yep, its just another way for our "color blind" society to find new ways to separate us into little groups and find new ways to discriminate against groups they don't approve of.

You gotta love the hypocrisy of liberalism; we have to be tolerant of everyone except those who don't agree with their agenda.


reply posted on 5-1-2011 @ 08:56 PM by Chadwickus
Well that is ridiculous.

What's stupid is that there are more eco friendly and fuel efficient cars out there than hybrids.

God I hate hybrids, the Southpark episode on them was right on track.

Here in Australia (and probably the UK), the Ford Fiesta econetic is half the cost of a prius and is more fuel effecient and it actually looks good too!

Here's an article which shows the farce of electric/hybrid cars:

Forget hybrid cars and electric vehicles; two of Australia’s fastest, thirstiest cars are on target to win a controversial 3000km economy run from Darwin to Adelaide.

The two thirstiest, most powerful cars in the field are on track to win the Global Green Challenge, an environmentally focussed fuel economy run from Darwin to Adelaide.

Two of the fastest cars ever produced in Australia – the HSV Maloo R8 and Ford Falcon XR6 Turbo – are first and second in the 14-car “Eco Challenge” field.

They’re on track to beat a fleet of fuel misers and even an electric car, which must be followed by a fuel sucking truck that’s likely to use as much fuel as six of the fuel misers fighting for line honours.


The most frugal car in the field – the Ford Fiesta ECOnetic – has a claimed fuel figure of 3.7L/100km and is using less than 3.2L/100km on the predominantly open road route.

However, that’s an improvement of only 15 per cent over its official claimed fuel figure, meaning that while the diesel powered Fiesta will likely use the least fuel on the event – possibly less than 100 litres across the 3000km course – it’s unlikely to win the challenge.


The only electric car in the field – there’s a separate World Solar Challenge running in conjunction with the Eco Challenge – is the US-made Tesla roadster.

However, the Tesla needs to be followed by a trayback truck carrying a high-voltage generator that needs to charge the electric car every 350km.

The truck is expected to consume more than 20 litres of fuel per 100km – triple that of the HSV Maloo – and around 700 litres over the 3000km course.

And that’s before you consider the diesel used by the generator as it charges the Tesla.

Organisers defend the Tesla’s green performance by saying the Tesla driver – internet entrepreneur Simon Hackett – is using the exercise to encourage governments to develop electric car recharging networks.

“Tesla is demonstrating that if electric fuel stations were available that it is entirely feasible and practical for a car of that nature to travel vast distances,” said Drewer.


Link

The last bolded part made me laugh, what a ridiculous idea it would be to have a network of electric car recharge points every 350km out in the Australian outback!


reply posted on 5-1-2011 @ 08:59 PM by pavil
reply to post by FortAnthem



I could see that happening if it were for cars to hook up to an electrical outlet for charging. No big deal in that case.


reply posted on 5-1-2011 @ 09:13 PM by FortAnthem
Originally posted by pavil
reply to
post by FortAnthem



I could see that happening if it were for cars to hook up to an electrical outlet for charging. No big deal in that case.



That I could see but, not right up front as some type of reward though.

Plus, you gotta figure, they aren't going to provide that electricity for free; there would have to be some sort of payment system attached to the chargers. I can't see many companies spending the money for something like that if most people can't afford the cars that would use it.

Maybe when they hit the used car market in 5-10 years, the average Joe will be able to afford them but, not anytime soon.


reply posted on 6-1-2011 @ 01:25 AM by pavil
reply to post by FortAnthem



Valid points, but it is probably easier to run the power closer to buildings, hence them being up front. I would expect the hookup to be like a vending machine, $5 gets you a 3 hour charge or something like that. Again you would want those up close to view them easier.

By no means should they be closer or replace handicapped spots.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 3 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags