Huge Triangular Craft Stationary over Chile 1-5-11 (update: video analysis)

page: 9
171
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 11:35 AM
link   
reply to post by orwellianunenlightenment
 


Just wanted to add that the video could indeed be fake. But I do not doubt the existence of the phenomenon. I have seen it. It is a shame that people would fake videos of something that I am sure many have posted real videos of. I have studied others. I will admit that I barely looked at this one. I admit that it could be fake, but I know that the existence of such a thing is not, even if it is merely a top-secret US (or other) aircraft, possibly even an advanced hologram, but I am leaning toward the first.




posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   
This 1st link is a video comparing this craft with pictures of the UFO in a previous video (below ). I would suggest watching both and you may come to the conclusion I have.I believe this is evidence supporting both are UFO's and the same craft.



www.youtube.com... - short comparison , two pictures of each from vid's

www.youtube.com... - video from last month in USA



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
 


Your video doesn't work on my iPad, you tube works but not w.e format you just used (avi?)

Good debunk though



You guys hear of the avrocar? A flying saucer made by the us government in ww two? It this is anything probally an avrocar same with all other ufos, just the government trying to confue the idiots.
edit on 6-1-2011 by Anthony1138 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocks123
 


Very obviously a phosphorus flare, or flare of some sort. You can tell by the flickering and discoloration, like this vid:


The one in your video was attached to a parachute and designed to burn longer.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:31 PM
link   
Anyone remember the Pheonix Lights?

Some are saying that: There is no "dark area" between the lights, so its not a UFO. Well, if you remember the testimony of the observers of the Pheonix lights incident - especially the witnesses that observed the craft fly over thier home just north of Pheonix, they said that you could see right through the craft, like it was translucent. Like they could see the stars through the craft, bending the light of the star as the craft passed in front of it. Could this be why you cannot see any dark areas in the video?

All im saying is that this is likley possible. Even the Rendlesham craft, That witness said during regression that the surface of the craft was black, glossy and could light up with changing patterns. I dont think this type stealth technology is too far fetched for an intellegent species. heck, I think this type tech is in testing now for the army. (its called active camoflauge)
edit on 6-1-2011 by GodKilla because: spell-check-FAIL



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anthony1138
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
 


Your video doesn't work on my iPad, you tube works but not w.e format you just used (avi?)

Good debunk though



You guys hear of the avrocar? A flying saucer made by the us government in ww two? It this is anything probally an avrocar same with all other ufos, just the government trying to confue the idiots.
edit on 6-1-2011 by Anthony1138 because: (no reason given)


Well next time don't be female-like and buy something that doesnt belong to Apple... (apple users=computer illiterate people)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
 


If I am you and you are me, we're just two waves upon one sea
And if one sea supports us all, then there's no way that we can fall

But if to fall we mean to win, we should at once our ways amend
For all we long for or yearn to be is back again, into the sea



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   
WOW ! This is the greatest video of the...little dipper,lol,
I wonder if any of the posters used full screen and saw the other stars behind the stationary...little dipper or big dipper in the sky.

I wonder did they see that the stars are clumped up behind the...stationary >little dipper? lol

When did the triangle ever have a third light in the middle of the back 2 lights ?lol.

I guess humans believe every thing they see.

Why do they think its a triangle spaceship ?
and why isnt this in the hoax section.

I really dont know my little pinheads,maybe the op is a woman and there not trying to hurt her fealings,or maybe they are trying to get brownie points,i have no idea why in hell they cant simply ,put full screen ,and notice them selves,but hey ,'it is what it is',let them believe what they want,lets go you all,work is done here.
edit on 6-1-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rocks123
Not sure if anyone seen this video on youtube, below is the link

www.youtube.com...


Ah yes olegen77 the Russian that films planes. All his plane videos are terrible,



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   
This is pretty impressive. There are a few things that we need before this can be taken any further. 1. The person who originally shot this needs to come forward with their account of that night and the the raw audio & raw footage need to be released 2. We need the exact location and daytime footage of the area needs to be shot. 3.The exact date and time are needed to help determine if there were any military exercises, skydivers, etc in the area that night.

I dont know if we have the YT footage from the person who actually filmed it? it seems as if there have been several copies made and music is often added when people use other peoples video, so dont jump the gun thinking the actual witness (original person who filmed this) added the music themselves. Im looking forward to the outcome and the rest of this discussion. Pretty cool video to start off the New Year!



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:31 PM
link   
This is crazy something is definietly going on.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   
No way it's flares IMO. No way it's lights on a hill IMO. The planes that fly through would not fly at a height below mountain tops.

Stars is the only debunk I am buying. Not completely sold on that either yet though, but if I had to guess, I would say stars.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by onehuman
 
great video,I always had this feeling that these triangular craft are U.S. secret government,thru reverse engineering or technology given to us from the aliens themselves,just a hunch though



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:32 PM
link   
reply to post by ufoyoshi
 

by me being the only human that has been in a triagle alien spacship ,let alon seeing one 2 times,it is not a triangle space ship and if it was ,its to low to stay stationary ,and it just cant stop like that,not for that long period of time.
they dont have a thrd light in the middle of the back 2 engines ,and there engines have ,and will never flicker.......PERIOD!



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:48 PM
link   
If this is legitimate, this is definitely one of the most compelling arguments for alien life/ secret government projects. Unfortunately, it very well could be a coincidental pattern created by the lights in the hills. All I can say is that I whole-heartedly hope that this is real.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by GodKilla
 


I have a website that you may find interesting that pertains to the supposed cloaking device of ufos. When I read your post I thought of this immediately

I am on my phone so it won't let me post it as a link :/ but if someone will help me out the website is www.uweb.superlink.net/~dialect/aliens.html

You don't have to agree with all of his theories but I really feel like he is on to something.
This may be a real ufo video.


reg

posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:17 PM
link   
Just done a quick Google search, it seems the video was taken in a town called Santiago, Chile LINK

There is also the same video on youtube with a Spanish(?) title that says it was filmed on the 3rd youtube link

Also on youtube are unrelated videos showing the area of Santiago during the day.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
I applied some filters to the video:

(click to open player in new window)


This is, for certain, not a "triangular craft" in the sky. In the video, foreground objects such as trees are darker than the sky. If there were a "huge triangular craft" in the sky, there would be a discernible dark shape between the lights. Three different video filters finds open space between the lights.

The lights on a mountain may also be a valid explanation, but we'd need to know more about the precise location this footage was obtained.


Conclusive -- no "huge triangular craft."



See, i would agree with you....

That is...

If the helicopter had a discernable shape when it passed by....



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:32 PM
link   
conclusion --- you need to stop forcing yourself to make conclusions for things that don't coincide with your realm of logic

like someone stated earlier, phoenix lights testimony stated that the craft was transparent and seemed to bend light.. if we're talking about a potentially advanced craft, you have to take into considerations reasons as to why there aren't dark spots in between the lights.. especially with all of the anomalous proclaimed functions of these types of craft

people say debunked, it's lights on a mountain top.. i say this.. if this truly was an advanced craft that lay stationary over chile.. anyone could claim it to be lights on a mountain top amongst other things.. there would be no way of discerning anything because a stationary craft with lights in a triangular shape would come across as a number of things



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:43 PM
link   
It's amazing how people can go on for days and days arguing about something they have no idea about. the FACT is that NOBODY knows if it's real or not. why are you arguing over something that you have no idea about? I wish I had the cash to go to Chile and investigate this... it'd be a lot more meaningful than sitting on my computer listing 5000 reasons why it's real or isn't real anyway... oh well.





new topics
top topics
 
171
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join