It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Geo Genny concept Is all about using gravity operated leverage in a very efficient way to gain a 1 to 8 ratio, 1in paid for energy in and 8 outputs free from the input of gravity, the 1 in paid for energy input is to rotate (drive ) the Geo Genny in the conservative force of gravity, and using the input of the constant flow of the kinetic energy of gravity acting on the rotating weighted levers to drive 8 generators to convert the energy from gravity to do useful work, like power our homes and cars.
I call gravity operated levers non-conservative mechanics because when they are rotated in the conservative force of gravity they generate a constant flow of kinetic energy to drive the generators on the lever pivots, wherein gravity is inputting to the system and not conserving the forces so if gravity is not conserving the mechanical energy it must be that the mechanical system is non-conservative, or the mechanics releases gravity from its conservative state, I am not shore how to describe the physics correctly so let just say gravity is being tapped.
Physics and engineering are among the subjects I majored in at the university, so physics is an area I know something about and I'd agree with Trevor that he's not shore [sic] how to describe the physics correctly.
Originally posted by RogerT
Here's a short clip from his home page:
If there appears to be a consensus that he's onto something, that could be the first area that I could help him out.
I am not shore how to describe the physics correctly so let just say gravity is being tapped.
Obviously the design is a little different but the similarities are striking. If Trevor actually got one to work I'd like to see a video of it, but I think the other lever design he's talking about is different, I'd like to see a video of whatever he's got that works.
"This is a gallery of some of the perpetual motion machine plans.
-The "Overbalanced Wheel". It was thought that the metal balls on the right side would turn the wheel because of the longer lever arm, but since the left side had more balls than the right side, the torque was balanced and the perpetual movement could not be achieved.
It would be interesting to see if NASA scientists Nelson and House have run across any interesting free energy devices to test:
Originally posted by RogerT
So I'm a FE believer but also skeptical that any physical device actually exists.
I'm considering devoting my time and energy in 2011 (and $100,000 of my own money) to the FE quest. My first thoughts are to do this in the form of a documentary, focusing on those who are working in the field and believe they either already have something that 'works' or are on the verge of a breakthrough.
I would say if any devices have at least met their initial screening process, it would be worth documenting what the "NASA Overunity Test Team" found about the project.
A couple of NASA scientists, Mike Nelson and Ken House, who work on the Space Shuttle project in Huntsville, Alabama have been following the free energy world for years and would like to believe that Tesla type of technology is possible that harnesses limitless energy from the environment via electromagnetic means.
However, this is not a free-for-all invitation for anyone who thinks they have an overunity device. Mike and Ken's pre-requisites are pretty stringent.
In their spare time, they are willing to put their reputation at stake in validating bona fide electromagnetic overunity (more energy out than what was put in). But "spare time" is the key word. They don't have much of it, so they don't want to spend time on things that haven't first been tested to show overunity by others; and they want to review the data that has been collected.
Hi Trevor and thanks for posting on ATS.
Originally posted by GeoGenny
Take a good long hard look at all of my Geo Genny video before making your minds up, the truth is what we all need as a starting point.
To which you replied:
you really need to show a selfrunning mode, otherwise no one will believe the 8:1 energy amplification.
Hi Stefan, What you are looking at is the Geo Genny’s gravity assisted gear box, next year I will build a small scale electric driven model complete with 8 generators, then it will be scaled up to be driven of the grid with a 6 megawatt input to drive the Hydraulic motor to turn the wheel at 22 rpm, there will be 16 x 3 megawatt wind turbine generator as they are off the shelf and have there own gearboxes already, plus are proven, there would be 8 on each side of the wheel, 42 mw output 24/7.
the designer needs to test their motor under a known mechanical load. If they don’t have a dynamometer available, then the simplest way to do this is to simply have their motor lift a known weight by winding a string or flexible cable of some sort around a spindle. This will serve as their homemade “dynamometer” if you will. We need to know the amount of weight lifted, the height the weight is lifted and the speed the weight is lift to get an output power measurement. Normally the speed is determined by the RPM’s of the output spindle. So, if the designer knows the height lifted with each RPM then all we need to know is the RPM’s of the spindle (not the motor if gear ratios are involved) to have the lifting speed.
I don't quite follow you Trevor.
Originally posted by GeoGenny
Thank you for your input, firstly looking at your picture of the levers taken from the perpetual motion site tells me one thing and that is if they had thought to tap the leverage of the falling levers instead of wasting it on the stops then they could have had a working gravity wheel hundreds of year ago, they should have discovered the Multi Lever Phenomenon not me, then they would have had hundreds of years to perfect it, that to me is a shame when I think how many people have been so close without seeing it.
Hi Trevor, if you can get it self-running with generators, you certainly don't need to mess with the weights on strings.
I do not see much point in using string and weights when the fish scale is doing the same job and I have used weights hanging off chains, I am happy with the Geo Genny tests and now will take it to the next stage.
If it makes 8 times as much electricity as it uses, then buy $100 of electricity, make $800 worth of electricity, sell it back to the power company, net profit $700.
Originally posted by Miccey
Elaborate some practical use
of this device...