Liberal Elite perform mass child-rape

page: 8
45
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:27 PM
link   
A lot of you are missing the bigger picture here getting hung up on "who did what". It really doesn't matter if they were liberals or not, you have to see the entire picture.

Liberals are the same as conservatives. At least at the top echelon. Both sides are mentally screwed, and it's been shown time and time again that their perverted point of view causes direct harm to the innocent. Be them children or adults.

It's a circle of abuse. Much like when a child is abused at a young age, they'll grow up abusive towards their children. That's what's happening in this school, and that's what we should focus on. This is happening world wide, I'm sure. In the U.S., in Europe, Scandinavia... The top tier needs to be exposed for what they are, evil sons of witches that need to be removed from their positions and then sent to trial for their crimes against the children, and the rest of humanity.

I'm a conservative, but will gladly work with a liberal to eradicate this problem from both sides. We can't stand divided, be you liberal or conservative, American or European. And only through our combined efforts, will we see any form of change. Divided is exactly where they want us and we go for it hook line and sinker.




posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Frontkjemper
A lot of you are missing the bigger picture here getting hung up on "who did what". It really doesn't matter if they were liberals or not, you have to see the entire picture.

Liberals are the same as conservatives. At least at the top echelon. Both sides are mentally screwed, and it's been shown time and time again that their perverted point of view causes direct harm to the innocent. Be them children or adults.

It's a circle of abuse. Much like when a child is abused at a young age, they'll grow up abusive towards their children. That's what's happening in this school, and that's what we should focus on. This is happening world wide, I'm sure. In the U.S., in Europe, Scandinavia... The top tier needs to be exposed for what they are, evil sons of witches that need to be removed from their positions and then sent to trial for their crimes against the children, and the rest of humanity.

I'm a conservative, but will gladly work with a liberal to eradicate this problem from both sides. We can't stand divided, be you liberal or conservative, American or European. And only through our combined efforts, will we see any form of change. Divided is exactly where they want us and we go for it hook line and sinker.


Thanks for the support, that is what I was trying to emphasize as well.

My opinion, which differs from that of the OP, is that examples can be found on all sides of the political spectrum of such institutionalized, perverted behavior.

Trying to create a political schism to something as important to eradicate as child abuse is misplaced energy.

the Billmeister



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Another school controlled by primitive human behavior, these men must be sentenced to death and not a painless one either, they caused pain to these kids, so they should suffer.

There is a reason, kids need to remain innocent, so they do not turn out to be like the monsters that wanted to touch them.

It is a mental disease and I am tired of pedos wanting justification, if they want to act like animals, then They shall be treated and slaughtered like animals.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   
rape is to force something on another person - our law says it includes sex with minors of a certain age other countries it's different age and some countries have no laws but the reality is a large portion of that is by both parties perspective consensual, it's only defined as illegal by 3rd parties.

that however is not the story here. I didnt like getting spanked but it's a reasonable method by what is described here is torture possibly used to force acceptance and that is rape.

torture and rape are not the same thing as sex with a minor at all.

I know that when I was 7 I wanted to see vanna white naked not just in playboy and by 11 I was hot for sharon stone after I snuck into basic instinct. People who would tell me that I was too young to understand are idiots, how many people really understand the full implications of "any" want - none.

Adults everyday go into bankruptcy and addiction and murder and all of the worlds evils over want. Me wanting to bone an actress at 11 was natural killing yourself at work for a ferrari is a relatively new invention and not what I'd consider natural.

The point is sex with a minor is not the issue here - it's torture and rape. they are different - not the same thing. I dont think sex with a minor is somthing people should do based on the laws but like any a and b situation I think it's mine and everyone elses obligation to c our well the hell out of it.

What am I saying it's more likely that americas next castration will be voted on by viewers using game pieces attached to the soda cups at the local mcdonalds because #ing with other peoples life is our individual right now.
edit on 6-1-2011 by circuitsports because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by Billmeister
The way I read the articles, this was a 70's revolution movement that went too far, and is only "officially" attached to left-wing politics through Green Party politician Daniel Cohn-Bendit.


Not at all. The school is liberal/leftist. The Kommune mentioned was socialist/leftist. The perpetrators were Green, Left, Liberal and Socialist. The philosophies were based on liberal "sexual liberation". Anti-Vietnam, Anti-Capitalism, Anti-Corportatism, Sex-Lib, Womens-Lib...its all liberalism. See also my last post.

Its very important that the facts not be obscured again, like they have in past mass-rape incidents involving leftists.


I guess we will agree to disagree.
My argument is that, yes, this article shows isolated cases of particular individuals attached to a particular political philosophy committing specific criminal behavior, other articles presented by contributors to this thread show the opposite political philosophy's tenants also capable of committing the same criminal behavior, thereby removing the relationship between any specific political affiliation and any specific criminal behavior.

I did not read in the article posted that the school had an official political affiliation only that it "flourished" during the liberal movement of the 70's... in fact, the article makes a point to consider the historical context.

It does talk of an unorthodox after school center (yes, with revolutionary philosophies, this I grant you), but to me, the fact that it is unorthodox means that it does not represent the norm.

If your premise is that radical liberalism is bad, I do not disagree, as I believe that most every type of radicalism is bad. Doesn't nazism fall under radical conservatism?
If, however, your premise is that radical liberalism is shown to have some sort of direct correlation to institutionalized child abuse, I don't believe you have succeeded.

But, once again, we can, respectfully, agree to disagree, that is the beauty of a not too radical right and not too radical left environment isn't it. One thing I'm sure we do agree on, is that whatever the political affiliation, when a criminal act of such reprehension is committed, individuals should be prosecuted to the furthest extent.

Respectfully,

the Billmeister



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Here in England where 33% of people get their news from "the liberal" British Brainwashing Commission I haven’t heard anything about this story.
Had it been a catholic boarding school then I guess it would be a different matter. Why? Because there is a battle between politics & religion, and the a-moral politics is winning that fight with the “progressives” mass media’s support.

As for Politics…
“Being moralistic” is good. Nobody can know anything but at least trying to have faith in moral ideals, brings the beholder closer to those ideals.
I believe A-moralism is liberalism, at its most extreme. But it is also the extreme right at its most extreme. Sometimes ideologies are so opposite that they become very similar e.g. Nazism & Communism.
edit on 090705 by Liberal1984 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by NadaCambia


You evaded my question. So I will repeat it; Provide evidence that American Liberals defend child molestors and Polanski.



I provided a list of 100 Hollywood-Liberals that petition for Polanski.

Btw: Which statement of mine makes you think Im a Nazi? Are people who are against the age of consent being lowered to 12, Nazis? What is the percentage of liberals you think would agree with you?



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by ladyinwaiting
 


Yes, he is pushing an agenda, but so are we all. I think a better element of this discussion would be how blind allegiance to any ideology can usurp common sense moral judgment, no matter the political or ideological bent. No excuse, but one possible element. When one submits to something that, in reality, is little more than an algorithm, then they must operate within its parameters. It is akin to a human submitting to a virus. And, lady-in-waiting, you must be honest (not that there is anything wrong with it), your avatar itself has an exceedingly clear agenda behind it, even though I am not foolish enough to get into any further discussion about it if you ask me for more details. I will just say it is white and involves a "sacred" marriage, much like the "sacred" marriage that is pushed in Christianity, brides of Christ and all that. Except your sacred marriage involves a woman and not a man. Basically, Sophia instead of Christ. I am not saying you are or are not a Christian. I am just stating that the avatar itself contains symbolic logic regarding purity and transcendence and gender and attraction. It clearly, whether you admit it or not, contains an agenda. Just stating. There are so many occult concepts in that avatar, well there are just so many. We all have an agenda. The ones who say they don't are merely displaying their poker face. Some are slicker than others.

Edit: BTW, the second nobody has an agenda is the second we all become big fat zeros. Can't happen. I will admit that this idea regarding liberals and child abuse is definitely stretching a bit, but the same has been done by those against the Catholic Church. It doesn't make either right. In fact, the reason women have so many freedoms today is because early feminists lied their asses off. They basically told a counter lie, in my view. This happens all throughout history. One group gets fed up, takes the "lies" of a PERCEIVED oppressor (although they are often actual oppressors), and they flip the lie to shine a light. It happens repeatedly. We humans like to play hot potato, and we love scapegoats. Rarely do many of us ever look at the roots of problems, or at least discuss them. They are too abstract to verify, so we take on an ideology that seeks to resolve these root problems. The "reality" in which we live today is the result of political and ideological agendas that have their vision blinded to the bigger "reality." We all want to live in our dream of choice. We all want something different. And the thing that bugs me from time to time is that many now know how to play the ideological games, but they might not have bothered to educate themselves. It is the straight avenue to power in this world to ride the coattails of something larger than oneself. Once we ride this wave or surf this rose, we instinctively ignore anything that contradicts it. We become "angels," having an angle that we play. We ALL do. There is no way around it, except to do the best we can with what we know and at least make an attempt to see the world around us and communicate with others. Basically, the world (and especially America) runs off of the interaction of warring ideologies. That way, people can be selfish liars oblivious to another side and the whole thing keeps going, always eventually correcting itself, although individuals are definitely unfairly hurt in the process. Collectively it works long term, but it throws individuals whose views are not in vogue under the bus. Much of what is political is fashionable, little more than a natural force, mindless. It allows people to act instinctively with little regard for the greater reality, at least outside of one's circle. It puts our minds at ease, the American dream.
edit on 6-1-2011 by orwellianunenlightenment because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Liberal1984
 


I agree, I also think ideologies at their extreme, which I would describe as people having blind, subservient allegiance to them, are totalitarian and amoral in nature. An ideology seeks only hegemony. Any "morals" it follows along the way are merely pragmatic. Ya gotta be a salesman, and nobody wants to buy an OBVIOUS monster. So some monsters act like a thing of beauty only to reveal their hideousness at a later date.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Its very much political. Liberals have been trying to lower the "age of consent" since ages. You wont find ANY conservative parties advocating that.


So the OP is to prove that Germans represent Americans and now as backup you use Britains and the Dutch to also prove something about Americans? Is this thread a complete joke?



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


I don't hope for it. It will happen and I will say "neener neener" just to be a dick about it and rub it in your faces.


Yeah, I am pretty clear on what you want to rub in whoms face. You have really been thinking about this.

Where did you read that I HOPE it will be true?

You read your posts and see how they come off to you.

I'm just stating that it WILL be true due to oversexualization of children, who will also grow and be the ones to write the laws.

You have said it 4 times now without offering any argument or evidence. Why should I just believe you because you repeat it?

There's nothing you or I can do about it, because western civilization has entered the post-modernist phase.
edit on 6-1-2011 by 547000 because: (no reason given)

You really really hope, don't ya?



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
The lack of intelligence in the commenting around here is appalling.

Self awareness is the first step to recovery! Good job.

This particular form of pedophilia is motivated by leftist ideologies of sexual liberation. Catholics (for example) are not motivated by political thoughts when they molest children.


I am sorry, what? Are you really making the argument that the political motivation behind rape does something to mitigate the harm done? That is appalling and severely lacking indeed. Why should I care what form of child rape child rape is? Child rape is child rape.


Big difference. Almost every poster around here tries to obscure what happens when liberalism goes overboard bx deflecting to conservatives.


It seems to me that you are trying to obscure what happens when horny conservatives have 5 minutes alone with a kid. How far down my list did you have to go before you found the fist Republican convicted of raping a 5 year old boy? Please explain to me what that child rape was any less of a crime because of the political motivation behind the rapist.

Maybe you just need to prove that any erection has any political ideology before you ramble any farther down this road.
edit on 6-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
The thread wasnt two pages old and they already started calling me a bigot.


No one is defending rape. No one is defending child rape. No one is defending pedophillia. No one is defending pre-pubescent age of consent laws. They are just calling you a bigot. Why do you think that would be?



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Why are you posting about Republicans?

To add balance to your premise.

What does that have to do with the story in the OP.

At least as much as a German school does with American Liberals if not more. My list was at least the right country.

Where did I say there are no Republican child molesters?

Nowhere. I never said you did. You did not have to say that. The OP and subsequent posts explain that your problem is not with child rape but with Liberals doing it.


Are you people really this black/white thinking?



Are you serious? Your premise is that you can paint American Liberals all one color based on something that happened in another country.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
wow...lucid eyes...full of FAIL! ill refrain from adding anything substantial only because many have done so already but that lucid eyes person just doesnt see it..so its rather pointless @ this point. painting a whole group with 1 brush is a tactic of the shameless-right...we are always wrong they are always right..


see what i did there?



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 





The extremes of either left or right lead to trouble. That is why we need both voices. They tend to moderate each other when combined in a healthy way. This is important to remember by those who think that one wing is harmful and should be excluded from the debate. Not so. The best form of government is produced when the best of the right and the best of the left are combined in positive ways. This is where we all should be instead of where we are. Where are we? Well it's easy to see that where we are is a place whereupon we do nothing but to hurl incriminating insults to each other over barbed wire obstacles. Time maybe for the adults among us to slap down the silly children in government and re-assert themselves.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
I provided a list of 100 Hollywood-Liberals that petition for Polanski.


100 Liberals = 0.000016% of the US citizens that self identify as Liberals.
So....0.000016% of a group is representative of the group?
edit on 6-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: decimal point issues



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   
Read : A People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn. It is a real eye opener if you are looking for some real history. He wrote this from the perspective of the disadvantage and misused of the country. It is very honest and will make you realize how much disinformation was taught to you in school that you accept as truth.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia

100 Liberals = 0.000016% of the US citizens that self identify as Liberals.
So....0.000016% of a group is representative of the group?


The most famous Liberals represent the Millions, just like the most famous Conservatives represent their Millions.

There are black sheep among any party. But its clear that sexual liberation, lowering the age of consent, defending the "rights" of child-molestors, attacking traditional roles of sexuality, attacking normal sex are classical left-wing agendas.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
In this thread only one person added research of their own (jibeho). So much for "collaborative posting". If you want to find the truth, stop attacking the messenger and go find some more documentation about this case.





new topics
top topics
 
45
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join