Liberal Elite perform mass child-rape

page: 4
45
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 08:51 PM
link   
Yet another thread pitting red against blue or left against right in the most ridiculous way: as if it matters.

So tired of people harping on about how one side or the other is going to save/destroy them/children/society/anything. We're so screwed if this keeps up.
edit on 5-1-2011 by PeasantRebellion because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 09:59 PM
link   
Mass-abuse of children in the left-wing elite school.

This was a massive brainwashing program to make sure there children would never become conservatives and be pliable to there controllers the rest of there lives.

The first thing in brainwashing someone is to break down there will through coercive persuasion and get thm into a mindset of "right-thinking"
Chosen techniques included dehumanizing of individuals this can be done at a early age by abuse or sexual abuse.

All the parts of a brainwashing program were evident at these school.
Behavior modification.
Emotionally intense persuasion techniques.
Methodical influence for the express purpose of manipulation.
Deceptive and Indirect Techniques of Persuasion and Control.
Psychological manipulation.
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

Many children that are sexually abused become pedophiles and this can be used by there controllers later in life as blackmail to control the subject. and this is even if they don't become pedophiles as fake evidence of them being pedos can be manufactured to use for blackmail.

Children that have been through this school should never be allowed to hold any public office as adults as they could/would be controlled by outside keepers.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   
So if I am reading the original posters intentions correctly. This case demonstrates that all liberally minded people are child rapists.

By extrapolation can I then state that the entirety of the the Catholic church are also ?

Or maybe every rabid evangelical preacher is a homosexual ?

How about every American Republican Senator is an adulterer ?

Broad generalizations such as this are both crass and dangerous.

Evil, sick and twisted people are evil sick and twisted people irrespective of political, religious or any other declared position.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 10:14 PM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 


What a sickening story. The fact that you are using this heinous crime to push your own political beliefs is almost as sick. Only the most extremist conservative idealogue would use this story to postulate the notion that all liberals are pedophiles. Most conservatives I know would be disgusted with what you are doing here. You should be ashamed of yourself for co-opting the crime committed against these children and twisting it for your own political use.

Pedophiles are a horrifying menace to society and should be removed from society. It is worth discussing the psychological profiles of pedophiles, but your assertion that all liberals advocate pedophilia is nothing more than a targeted, intentional, and willful attempt by you to agitate and create controversy where in truth, there is none.

Any sane minded person understands that pedophilia is not a political behavior, it is a sexual crime against children.. To link or equate politics with sex crimes is ridiculous. That being said, to refute your ludicrous claims, I am providing a link to a list of pedophiles and sex criminals who also happen to be political conservatives. Note that the site from which the list comes is a fellow conspiracy theory site.

List of Pedophiles and Sex Criminals

I have not fact checked every incident on the list, nor am I denying that there are also pedophiles in society who are liberals politically. The politics of these criminals is not important. Protecting children from them and ridding society of them is.
edit on 5-1-2011 by dalloway because: misspelling
edit on 5-1-2011 by dalloway because: none



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 10:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by ANNED


Just a tad curious here.


Many children that are sexually abused become pedophiles and this can be used by there controllers later in life as blackmail to control the subject.

OK, that has some logic to it.

and this is even if they don't become pedophiles as fake evidence of them being pedos can be manufactured to use for blackmail.

Then why bother rape them as kids and hope they turn out to be a pedophile? What if they turn out stupid? Inept? Would it not make more sense to find an adult that can accomplish your goals and then use that fake evidence against then?

Just curious about the logic.
edit on 5-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 10:41 PM
link   
Im really happy that the general consensus is that this is nothing but a partisan troll thread. Good to see it ATS


We all know that ALL Catholic Priests love little boys..
All Republicans are in bed with wallstreet bankers..
All Democrats are part of the NWO and love marxist, socialist, communism, blah bah.

We all know that every Black person is on wellfare.
We all know that every blah blah blah...




One thing i hope we all do know, or will soon learn. Is that this type of BS( Partisan/Look at the other guy because he is bad) is what is really hurting us. Shame on you OP.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 11:06 PM
link   
I tell you again, pedophilia will be acceptable to future generations. It will start simply by asking if it's just for a 17 year old to go to jail for having sex with an 18 year old and progress from there, until it gets to the point where if the child will consent it's okay. Mark my words.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 11:09 PM
link   
reply to post by 547000
 



I pray that you're wrong, but as with many other things it is a very slippery slope. I know in my state the age of consent is 16 so.........



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 11:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by 547000
I tell you again, pedophilia will be acceptable to future generations. It will start simply by asking if it's just for a 17 year old to go to jail for having sex with an 18 year old and progress from there, until it gets to the point where if the child will consent it's okay. Mark my words.


The age of consent in America has steadily been going up. It varies state by state but where as the youngest age at which you could legally have sex with an adult was once 13 in Utah, it is NOW 15 in Washington D.C. Most states have raised it over time to conform with the more typical age of 18. If trends actually continue the age of consent will be federally mandated at 21 before I die.



posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


Sexual liberation means overthrowing rigid control structures preventing people from having sex. In the future we will seem like the old bigoted people holding back society from progressing.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by 547000
I tell you again, pedophilia will be acceptable to future generations. It will start simply by asking if it's just for a 17 year old to go to jail for having sex with an 18 year old and progress from there, until it gets to the point where if the child will consent it's okay. Mark my words.


Oh they're marked alright...

On the crazy list.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 12:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ladyinwaiting
 


Let's summarize:

1. You deny that the events described are politically motivated (when clearly they are)
2. You deny that political activism for pedophiles comes from the left (which it does)
3. You deny that the people described see sexual liberation of children as something "progressive" (which they do)

Instead of acknowledging the facts, you choose to lash out and attack the messenger.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by PeasantRebellion
Yet another thread pitting red against blue or left against right in the most ridiculous way: as if it matters.



IThe OP contains nothing but facts. You folks on this website seem to be more into knee-jerk reactions than reading and research.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by ladyinwaiting
 


Let me guess: You have never entered a thread on "Catholics are pedophiles" and attacked the OP in the same way.

Am I right?

Guess how I knew....



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


Sexual liberation means overthrowing rigid control structures preventing people from having sex. In the future we will seem like the old bigoted people holding back society from progressing.


I just posed an actual valid argument as to why your "prediction" does not hold as much water as you presented it. Instead of coming up with a valid argument, you just restate your "prediction?"

Forgive me if I put little to know value in that argument.



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:13 AM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 


1. So being a liberal means you're a pedophile? Nice.
2. I've never seen mainstream (or even bat# crazy spin off groups for that matter) that are left or right minded advocating pedophilia.
3. Again. Never seen this before. So how would people see something as "progressive" if they've not seen it before? Well. You could just say that, and then demonized the people you don't like.

But you wouldn't do that, would you?
edit on 6-1-2011 by Miraj because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes

 


I guess this explains why American Liberals keep defending child molestors such as repeat child rapist Polanski. I never really understood it, but apparently it is connected to the idea of liberation from traditional values which these people feel are "restrictive".

What liberals need to do, in my opinion, is know where to draw the line, know where to tell the difference between good and bad. Of course most liberals will say Im being moralistic, but even from a medical and psychological standpoint having sex with minors is harmful. Also, the liberal fallacy has always been that "liberation" includes "liberating others", even if its against their will. I hope humanity overcomes these kind of "progressives" for some real progress to move beyond mere animal instincts.



You're the one who included the bull# ending paragraphs about how this "explains American liberals". You're a damned idiot for even saying those things. I don't know a single liberal person who would condone pedophilia or think any less of this scandal than a heinous disgusting act. And then you say you hope humanity overcomes these kind of progressives? What the #? It's progressives such as me who only wish to see the world living in peace and unity, and to progress towards greater things, throwing out the materialistic ideologies of the modern world. Has nothing to do with sexual morality. Don't ever use pedophilia or immoral in the same sentence as liberal/progressive ever again please. It's extremely insulting and only makes you look like a fool.
edit on 6-1-2011 by Raelsatu because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 


Oh by the way, read this very recent article on how Republicans kills an anti-child marriage bill. Yea it must be the liberals behind the whole thing..

minnesotaindependent.com...



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


The fact that you don't know what the movement of sexual liberation is all about is worrying. And given the hard times to come childhood can no longer be deferred to later dates anymore because western children cannot be afforded to have extended childhood. The young will always try to push the boundaries of the old.

I have made the argument but you don't seem to understand yet.
edit on 6-1-2011 by 547000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nomadmonkey
We know exactly what trollish point you are trying to make here OP. You take something that happened 35+ years ago, in GERMANY, and then try to imply that American liberals today would support it. And you do it by citing 1 case, that also happened 30+ years ago. This is a very lame attempt IMHO.


Happened 35+ years ago? You people dont even read OPs. This was happening up until two years ago when the police finally busted the "progressive" institution.

I guess posting conspiracies on this site is only worth something if no liberals are involved and no facts are involved.





top topics
 
45
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join