Liberal Elite perform mass child-rape

Originally posted by lucid eyes
reply to post by Sinnthia

 

Actually conservatives dont like to rape children. Conservatives like law and order, country and family. Liberals like to defy law, order, country and family. What better way to defy all traditional conservative values than by mass child rape?

Thanks, I just love to dust this puppy off whenever I see pinheads espousing the high moral standards of the "conservative" party:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/08c5fbe431ce.jpg[/atsimg]

I realize story was related to abuse in Germany but you drew parallels to American Liberals in your OP.

I guess this explains why American Liberals keep defending child molestors.....

Yet another violent mass child rape commited by socialists.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Yet another violent mass child rape commited by socialists.

American Liberals = socialists = Chinese governmnet ??????



I... I just.

Wow.

You know you should... I mean..

Wow.

American Liberals = socialists = Chinese governmnet ?????????????????????????

They say that if you were to take the time to explain to an ant why it is less sophisticated than you as a human, the only thing achieved is a human wasting time making incomprehnsible noises an ant cannot hear.

OK, I think I am convinced.

Your premise: American Liberals promote and support child rape.

Your evidence:

Some people at a school in Germany.
A list showing less than 0.0001% of a given group supports a Polish man from France.
Chinese government officials raped some girls.



I do not know how I missed it. Thank you. Thank you so much. I am going to become a good Republican Christian now and go to a good proper church with priests. That should get me away from all those pesky child rapers.

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Your premise: American Liberals promote and support child rape.

Im not surprised you still dont understand the premise of this thread which is that left-wing "sexual liberation philosophy" turns foul when taken too far.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Im not surprised you still dont understand the premise of this thread which is that left-wing "sexual liberation philosophy" turns foul when taken too far.

I am not surprised you are still trying to parse words in a flacid attempt to couch your own fallacious premise within the contextual pretzels only your own logic seems to be able to create, promote, then deny.

What is "too far?"

If it is not child rape then you have wasted a LOT OF TYPING here.

reply to post by Sinnthia


The premise of this thread is that "sexual liberation ideology", taken too far, leads to child rape.

You have been the most vocal opponent of this thread and its premise, which is no coincidence seeing how on other threads you defend pedophiles.

Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Your premise: American Liberals promote and support child rape.

Im not surprised you still dont understand the premise of this thread which is that left-wing "sexual liberation philosophy" turns foul when taken too far.

Hmmm. I guess I am really confused here. I said the premise of your thread is that American Liberals basically are all for child rape. You said I missed the premise of the thread. Then you said this.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
The premise of this thread is that "sexual liberation ideology", taken too far, leads to child rape.

Are you following your own thoughts?

You have been the most vocal opponent of this thread and its premise, which is no coincidence seeing how on other threads you defend pedophiles.

You have already made that fallacious claim and failed to back it up more than once. Do you feel that telling a lie more often will eventually make it true? Is this the real premise of your thread? You hope if you just say this all often enough, it will become true?

Stop lying about people. It makes you hard to trust when you lie. Maybe I am just petty like that.

You cannot find one quote of my defending pedophillia or child rape. We have been over this. You failed the last time and I stated this already. If you were having an honest discussion about reality, I would not need to remind you that you already failed to back up this lie before, would I?

I have never defended pedophillia or child rape. Not on ATS or anywhere else. I am not sure why you think making stuff up helps your credibility. I am not sure how trying to slander my character helps your case either. Can you explain that? I am not the "most vocal" person in this thread. I am just one of the few people that found it entertaining enough to stick around. I think you think you have a huge audience here that I am standing out from. Look at the posters that have come and gone. Look at the stars for both my posts and yours. It is pretty much just me here. That is why you hear me so well. I am glad my attention flatters you and inflates the ego so. I have been accused of being a crowd on ATS before. Seems odd for someone who weighs less than 120lbs soaking wet to continuously be referred to as a group or crowd or many people. Anyway. Your thread entertains me but if you would like to sit here and talk to yourself about it, just say the word and I will stop reading it like pretty much everyone else already has.

Jibeho still here backing you up? Where did that other character go?

Hello????????????????

Bueller?

Originally posted by Sinnthia
OK, I think I am convinced.

Your premise: American Liberals promote and support child rape.

Your evidence:

Some people at a school in Germany.
A list showing less than 0.0001% of a given group supports a Polish man from France.
Chinese government officials raped some girls.



I do not know how I missed it. Thank you. Thank you so much. I am going to become a good Republican Christian now and go to a good proper church with priests. That should get me away from all those pesky child rapers.

Please don't forget about the efforts of Dr. Kinsey right here at home. He is considered to be one of the liberal elite behind the mass sexual abuse of children.

Plenty of detailed and irrefutable evidence here:
www.drjudithreisman.org...

Originally posted by jibeho
Please don't forget about the efforts of Dr. Kinsey right here at home.

Cute. Ears burning? So there are at least still two of you here? Good to know.

He is considered to be one of the liberal elite behind the mass sexual abuse of children.

By whom? Can I decide who is and who is not considered one of the whatever you guys are elite?

Plenty of detailed and irrefutable evidence here:
www.drjudithreisman.org...

So you are telling me that Kinsey is some Liberal elite something but then you assume I need to be educated on him, as a Liberal. That is some interesting line of thinking going on there. Can you help me out with it? If he is some liberal elite master symbol of sexual liberation, then why do you think you need to tell a liberal who he is and what he did?

Let me tell you that all you conservatives worship, stand behind, look up to, defend Mr. X. Now I have to assume you know nothing about Mr. X so let me give you a link so you can learn about the guy I am telling you that you people hold up as a hero.



That is the most amazing way of seeing things I have heard allllllllll day. I guess any that did anything you do not like that may have also had a political ideology you do not like is a solid link but all the conservative child rapists are just ........ whats that? Sorry, phone is ringing, teapot whistling.....WHAT!?!?! I AM SORRY BAD C N CT ON. .. . .

reply to post by Sinnthia


Do you consider the following research to be normal and acceptable?: From the father of the liberal sexual revolution....

Kinsey's 1948 and 1953 books on human sexual behavior contain tables of information about sexual responses in children as young as 2 months old. Several tables record how long the children needed to be stimulated to achieve "orgasm," and others record how many "orgasms" the children achieved in given periods of time.

www.drjudithreisman.com...

Just Curious...

Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Sinnthia

 

Do you consider the following research to be normal and acceptable?: From the father of the liberal sexual revolution....

Does not matter whether or not I find it normal or acceptable. What matters is whether or not I find it evidence that American Liberal = Child Rape advocate.

The answer to that question, the one that has to do with the premise put forth by this thread, is that I do not.

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Originally posted by jibeho
Please don't forget about the efforts of Dr. Kinsey right here at home.

Cute. Ears burning? So there are at least still two of you here? Good to know.

He is considered to be one of the liberal elite behind the mass sexual abuse of children.

By whom? Can I decide who is and who is not considered one of the whatever you guys are elite?

Plenty of detailed and irrefutable evidence here:
www.drjudithreisman.org...

So you are telling me that Kinsey is some Liberal elite something but then you assume I need to be educated on him, as a Liberal. That is some interesting line of thinking going on there. Can you help me out with it? If he is some liberal elite master symbol of sexual liberation, then why do you think you need to tell a liberal who he is and what he did?

Your ignorance is purely blissful as is your innocent naivete. You don't have to read and learn about anything. I don't think that you can handle the facts. Clearly.. history speaks for itself regarding the heinous acts of Kinsey and others like him.

Originally posted by jibeho
Your ignorance is purely blissful as is your innocent naivete.

Please elucidate. Empty ad hominem attacks are really kind of old to me on ATS.

You don't have to read and learn about anything.

You need to make up my mind. Should I be learning about Kinsey or is he my ideological God already? It cannot be both, sorry; Not in reality.

I don't think that you can handle the facts.

I do not think you have any in support of the OP's claims that some Chinese officials and few actors that signed a petition represent Sexual Liberation Child Rape Ideology. I have not seen any yet. How would you know whether I could handle them or not at this point?

Clearly.. history speaks for itself regarding the heinous acts of Kinsey and others like him.

I must have missed my denial of any such thing or expression of admiration for the man. Maybe reading is tougher than I assume?





In summation. Your post says that I am ignorant and kinsey was a pervert. Than you.

reply to post by Sinnthia


A few pages back I linked to a post in another thread where you were defending a book that OK'd child-rape. And then you refuse to tell us what your views on the "age of consent" are. Your agenda and affiliation doesnt get any more obvious than that.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
reply to post by Sinnthia

 

A few pages back I linked to a post in another thread where you were defending a book that OK'd child-rape.

LIE!

Even good liars undestand that repetition does not make false things true. When will you get that? We have been over this. You have pushed this lie already. I have refuted it already. You have made it again, I have refuted it again. I even asked you to find a quote in that thread that supports your lie and you refuse to even try.

It is a lie and you know.

I thought the entire point of your thread was based on you maintaining the moral high ground? Why is lying about me ok then?

All you have a link to a thread where in it, I point out that in America we do not put people to death for writing books, not matter HOW DISGUSTING that book may be. I also point out that this is a policy I agree with wholeheartedly. I never once defend pedophilia or rape.

Do we really need to keep going over this?

Can you explain why you think lying is ok?

Can you explain why trying to slander me as pro-child rape with lies is ok?

And then you refuse to tell us what your views on the "age of consent" are.

I do not "refuse" anything. I simply dismissed your distractive action for what it was and failed to fall for your ruse. I had a dog as a kid. I know that pretending to throw the ball trick already, sorry. If my views on the age of consent becomes relevant to the discussion, I will be glad to enlighten you. So far the only reason you have even asked is to avoid answering questions directed back at you. Besides, I know what my answer is and I know how little it will help your argument so why not hold onto it until I really even need to play that card? You seem to be losing this argument just fine without it. Perhaps explain what my view on age of consent has to do with anything, AFTER you address all of the above, I will open up to you.

Your agenda and affiliation doesnt get any more obvious than that.

Really?

What is my agenda?

What are my affiliations?

You do have other questions to address before this such as why you keep lying about me in order to make your point. I guess I have trouble understanding how you hope to convince anyone of some globaly liberal conspiracy based mainly on your word and purposefuly ignorance of a balance of facts when your argument seems to hang solely on some lie about me, a random name on ATS? Lying does not usually bolster credibility in my view. Perhaps your one fan sees it the way you do.

Maybe you both think people in the US should be put to death for things they write in a book?

reply to post by Sinnthia


Do you agree with Dr. Kinsey?

Do you also think Polanski should go free?

Do you also believe the Pedophile author of that book mentioned earlier should not be punished?

Do you believe that the events mentioned in the OP have nothing to do with "sexual liberation" ideology?

Simple questions which you havent even begun to answer.

Btw...Obama knew of the past of his School and Education advisor. This guys organization not only desired sexual education for children but much more than that...that sexual violence be commited toward children. Or why hand out rubber gloves so that the kids could fist each other? Thats the Democrats vision for our future.

Originally posted by kinda kurious


Thanks, I just love to dust this puppy off whenever I see pinheads espousing the high moral standards of the "conservative" party:

You are comparing going to a Prostitute or having sex outside of marriage to child-rape?

Child-rape is a whole other level. It is taking someone who is innocent and cannot defend him- or herself and commiting an act of violence that scars the child for life.

Originally posted by Sinnthia

What is my agenda?

What are my affiliations?

We have produced tons of documented facts in this thread and you have yet to acknowledge a single piece of evidence. You have yet to declare your stance on any of them. The only thing you are doing is attacking the messenger and defending the rights of child-rapists.