posted on Feb, 9 2011 @ 02:52 AM
Originally posted by lucid eyes
reply to post by Sinnthia
A few pages back I linked to a post in another thread where you were defending a book that OK'd child-rape.
Even good liars undestand that repetition does not make false things true. When will you get that? We have been over this. You have pushed this lie
already. I have refuted it already. You have made it again, I have refuted it again. I even asked you to find a quote in that thread that supports
your lie and you refuse to even try.
It is a lie and you know.
I thought the entire point of your thread was based on you maintaining the moral high ground? Why is lying about me ok then?
All you have a link to a thread where in it, I point out that in America we do not put people to death for writing books, not matter HOW DISGUSTING
that book may be. I also point out that this is a policy I agree with wholeheartedly. I never once defend pedophilia or rape.
Do we really need to keep going over this?
Can you explain why you think lying is ok?
Can you explain why trying to slander me as pro-child rape with lies is ok?
And then you refuse to tell us what your views on the "age of consent" are.
I do not "refuse" anything. I simply dismissed your distractive action for what it was and failed to fall for your ruse. I had a dog as a kid. I
know that pretending to throw the ball trick already, sorry. If my views on the age of consent becomes relevant to the discussion, I will be glad to
enlighten you. So far the only reason you have even asked is to avoid answering questions directed back at you. Besides, I know what my answer is and
I know how little it will help your argument so why not hold onto it until I really even need to play that card? You seem to be losing this argument
just fine without it. Perhaps explain what my view on age of consent has to do with anything, AFTER you address all of the above, I will open up to
Your agenda and affiliation doesnt get any more obvious than that.
What is my agenda?
What are my affiliations?
You do have other questions to address before this such as why you keep lying about me in order to make your point. I guess I have trouble
understanding how you hope to convince anyone of some globaly liberal conspiracy based mainly on your word and purposefuly ignorance of a balance of
facts when your argument seems to hang solely on some lie about me, a random name on ATS? Lying does not usually bolster credibility in my view.
Perhaps your one fan sees it the way you do.
Maybe you both think people in the US should be put to death for things they write in a book?