Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Liberal Elite perform mass child-rape

page: 19
45
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by lnr42
you are a very dangerous person.


Am I the dangerous person or are the people I am reporting about dangerous? You guys think that its enough to just enter a thread and reverse the statements, like little children playing tit-for-tat.




posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by tiger5
I am a liberal and probably have more rules and regulations than you.


I believe that. Having rules and regulations and forcing them onto others, thats what liberalism is all about.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 



Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by lnr42
you are a very dangerous person.


Am I the dangerous person or are the people I am reporting about dangerous? You guys think that its enough to just enter a thread and reverse the statements, like little children playing tit-for-tat.


Way to cherry pick.

How many converts do you think this spiteful little thread has gained for whatever the hell your cause may be?

I'm gonna guess none.

All you are accomplishing here is to paint perfectly normal right wing types as ignorant, vicious nasty people willing to use children to further their own agenda. Like you.

Isnt this the opposite of what you are feebly attempting to do? If so I would probably stop posting now if I were you.

Still hopefully it is keeping you away from someones kids.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by lnr42
Still hopefully it is keeping you away from someones kids.


Why would I have to be kept away from kids?


I have a better idea of the type of people who would have to be kept away from kids:

Abortion doctor charged with murdering 7 babies after they are born.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 


What on earth does that have to do with this particular trainwreck of a thread?

Dont tell me, the accused was a 'commie'?



Prosecutors said Gosnell made millions of dollars over three decades performing thousands of dangerous abortions, many of them illegal late-term procedures. His clinic had no trained nurses or medical staff other than Gosnell, a family physician not certified in obstetrics or gynecology, prosecutors said.


Looks more like a sociapathic, very greedy, opportunistic, capitalist scumbag to me.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Just what the HELL are you talking about? Ive acknowledged conservative child-molestors a dozen times in this thread. Why would I deny facts???

Its not me denying the facts
edit on 25-1-2011 by lucid eyes because: (no reason given)


Actually your "acknowledgement" consisted entirely of you saying you had no idea what I was talking about and that it did not matter to you because it was not the subject of your thread.

That is pretty easy to translate into "you are not even going to look because it destroys your premise." Yeah, you "acknowledged" sure, then waved it off and pretended no one heard you.

Meanwhile, you again use that failed Polanski argument because you insist that all liberals can be represented by .000016% of the population of American Liberals. How do you keep ignoring that they do not even equal 1%? Sorry but you are not even doing a halfway decent job of foolling anyone here.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 05:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


If you havent figured out by now that I acknowledge plenty of conservative child-molestors, how will you ever figure out what this thread is about?


Oh, the poor, missunderstood ATS genius at work. How do you all ever go on? There is nothing here that is the least bit difficult to understand. Finding your premise and your evidence delusioanally flimsy is not the same thing as not getting it. I get it just fine. I am pretty sure we all get it just fine. Just not buying it. Dismissing and acknowledging are not the same thing. Maybe if you get all the supporters that agree with you to help you explain yourself, it will not come across as such a dishonest troll thread.



posted on Jan, 25 2011 @ 05:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Am I the dangerous person or are the people I am reporting about dangerous? You guys think that its enough to just enter a thread and reverse the statements, like little children playing tit-for-tat.


Why not? You seem to think just starting a thread and then making up anything you want is ok. What is wrong with people pointing out the flaws in your argument? Were you hoping people would just read this thread, take your word for it, and start the lynching?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Do you agree that

All campaigners for repeat child-rapist Polanski are card-carrying Democrats and Socialists.

All pedophile-advocacy groups are liberal or leftist

All campaigners to lower the age-of-consent are liberals or leftists

All defenders of child-rapists "rights" are liberals. (Dont believe it? Check the threads on this Forum!!!)

All education programs designed to teach children sex are based on liberal premises.

?

And do you think all of that is just a coincidence?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


Your constant defense of pedophiles in threads and posts like this tell the reader everything they have to know of why you keep attacking me in this thread.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by lucid eyes
 


And you appear to be taking as much orgasmic pleasure from it as the perpetrators did. bravo, good sir. bravo.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
reply to post by Sinnthia
 


Your constant defense of pedophiles in threads and posts like this tell the reader everything they have to know of why you keep attacking me in this thread.


Please show us one post where I defend pedophilia or child rape?

We have already had this dance and you failed the last time to prove your slanderous twisting of reality. If a pedophile is accused of burning down a house he did not burn down and I know that. I would say that he did not burn down the house. You would try to characterize me as defending pedophiles.

Show one post where I defend pedophilia or child rape.

You try to say that 0.000016% of all US liberals represent the other 99% and you then you say crap like this. My fault for thinking you wanted to be taken seriously at all.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Do you agree that

All campaigners for repeat child-rapist Polanski are card-carrying Democrats and Socialists.

All pedophile-advocacy groups are liberal or leftist

All campaigners to lower the age-of-consent are liberals or leftists

All defenders of child-rapists "rights" are liberals. (Dont believe it? Check the threads on this Forum!!!)

All education programs designed to teach children sex are based on liberal premises.

?

And do you think all of that is just a coincidence?


No, I do not agree with you overall statement above. I can easily say do you not agree that

All cases of covered up for and excused intances of child rape within the Catholic church were done by pedophiles.

All the politicians keeping the child rape industry afloat in the Dominican Republic are American Conservatives.

All the "Christian" child placement charities that keep getting busted selling kids into sex slavery are CONSERVATIVES.

We can play this game all day. Your point has failed for many pages now. I am not sure if you think you are going to eventually win someone over by pushing the same twisted bias over and over again but it seems to be not working.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Please show us one post where I defend pedophilia or child rape?



In this thread you attack me for pointing out child-molestation. In that thread you defend a pedophile. Just a coincidence?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia

No, I do not agree with you overall statement above.


You dont??? Which statement is false?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by Sinnthia

Please show us one post where I defend pedophilia or child rape?



In this thread you attack me for pointing out child-molestation.


Not even remotely true. I am arguing against your obvious political trolling barely disguised as concern for child rape. I see through you like it seems most in this thread have.


In that thread you defend a pedophile. Just a coincidence?




In that thread all I have said is that no one in the US should be put to death for simply writing a book, no matter what is in that book.

You do not like to be honest much, do you?



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia


In that thread all I have said is that no one in the US should be put to death for simply writing a book, no matter what is in that book.



You have several posts defending the rights of the pedophile and yet not a single post showing any concern or defense of children.




posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes

You have several posts defending the rights of the pedophile and yet not a single post showing any concern or defense of children.



Because he wrote a book, name one child he did anything too and I will be all about feeling sorry for them. In the America I live in, we do not kill people for writing books. I would like it to stay that way. That thread is not about children being hurt. It is about a guy who wrote a book. Keep trying.
edit on 26-1-2011 by Sinnthia because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sinnthia
Because he wrote a book, name one child he did anything too and I will be all about feeling sorry for them


Just because he did not get caught in the act, does not mean he is innocent. But this is really helpful for the readers, because its what liberals do. Of all the people they could defend....national heroes, mothers, fathers, everyday heroes, of all the thousands of people to stand up for, the liberal chooses pedophiles.



posted on Jan, 26 2011 @ 02:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by Sinnthia
Because he wrote a book, name one child he did anything too and I will be all about feeling sorry for them


Just because he did not get caught in the act, does not mean he is innocent.


The US constitution says something different.


But this is really helpful for the readers, because its what liberals do. Of all the people they could defend....national heroes, mothers, fathers, everyday heroes, of all the thousands of people to stand up for, the liberal chooses pedophiles.


People don't often call for the murder of national heroes, mothers, fathers, or everyday heroes. That's kind of the key point you're missing there. I'd defend their right to not be murdered just as readily, if it ever came up.






top topics



 
45
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join