|
reply posted on 25-7-2002 @ 07:59 AM by William
|
I never heard anything about radiation.
Still...
Don't you agree that if the "explosion" happened first, the plume of the thumbnail should be visible in the two pictures I posted?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2002 @ 08:35 AM by CG
|
That would depend on the sequence of detonation.
And if I were going to hide such a detonation, it would be timed to go just after the colapse to help hide its occurance and sound.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-7-2002 @ 07:33 AM by William
|
I found this video from another source. Since the original was over 20 megabytes, I recompressed it for better download.
This clearly shows the secondary plume forming as a result of the debris hitting the ground.
Case closed now? 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-7-2002 @ 08:24 PM by William
|
I hate to say I told them so, but...
hell, no I don't.
I told you so!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-7-2002 @ 02:19 AM by Kano
|
William had the upper hand though, seeing as though the same conclusion was reached like 9 months ago when the idea first surfaced on the boards 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 27-7-2002 @ 07:42 AM by William
|
Yeah Kano, I think I said that too... but they never listen.
~sigh~
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 27-7-2002 @ 09:01 AM by CG
|
Well done!
I have maintained from the start that all I was looking for were the facts. I had not seen this proof, and untill I did, I had every right to my
suspicions. In anycase I do agree your pictire is clear enough to see you are correct.
Thank you for participating in the topic and your excellet contribution to the truth.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 2-8-2002 @ 10:05 PM by Quicksilver
|
well done cg
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 5-9-2002 @ 11:55 PM by mad scientist
|
Why do all these people assume the US government conspires to mislead and kill their people ?
I mean, do these people just believe anything that is told to them. There are absolutely no hard facts to say that it was something other than what it
was.
As for the trading in AA and UA stocks, that was probably done by bin laden and his henchmen.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 8-8-2009 @ 06:47 AM by anti72
|
Originally posted by William
If you look at all the video angles of the collapse, you'll see the "explosion" cloud you're trying to get us to believe in is just dust rising
from the collapse of Tower 2. The angle from the south clearly shows the dust rising to the east, from the collapse -- building falls down - dust goes
up -- simple. Tower 7 is at the northern-opposite end of the complex from Tower 2.
wrong. its not ´just dust rising from the collapse of Tower 2.
"The unexplained blast occurred between the burning North Tower and the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, immediately after
United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower, at about 9:03 a.m. "
www.prisonplanet.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-8-2009 @ 05:07 PM by jprophet420
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 8-8-2009 @ 05:18 PM by king9072
|
Originally posted by mad scientist
Why do all these people assume the US government conspires to mislead and kill their people ?
I mean, do these people just believe anything that is told to them. There are absolutely no hard facts to say that it was something other than what it
was.
As for the trading in AA and UA stocks, that was probably done by bin laden and his henchmen.
So let me get this straight.
You decided to dig up a thread that is 7 years old, and hasn't been posted in the same length.
All so you could claim that there is no evidence that the official story is a lie? And you wonder "why the US government would conspire to mislead
and kill their people", despite the fact they have done JUST that many times in history, which is now proven fact.
You need to get a grip.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
