It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bob Lazar seems to confirm Zecharia Sitchin

page: 18
38
<< 15  16  17    19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 08:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ghostinshell
The whole UFO/Alien field is full of DisInfo and MisInfo.


No disagreement there.


while, the Lazar story is very interesting. reality is, we really don't know how much if any of it is really true.


We??
WE really don't know??
Speak for yourself please. -You- really don't know.

-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.

"reality is," is that he was indeed telling the truth.

If you did not go to the public BLM land to see for YOURSELF if he was telling the truth, then your opinion on the veracity of his claims does not hold much weight.



we don't know, and we doubt many such story's for many reasons. who knows, whats really what.


Well actually, I do.
And so do several others who actually got off their duff and went to go have a look for themselves.




my guess would be if any of this is true, this would be a case of fact thats stranger than fiction. because, the truth (if) would be so outlandish compared to what we believe to be true would boogle our minds...


Good guess. Watching the saucers being test flown is beyond outlandish, and indeed boggles the mind.
It also gives you a huge adrenaline rush and makes your hair stand on end.

Yours is a normal skeptical reaction to his claims, or any of the many other claims that are out there. I was skeptical at first also, but probably for different reasons. I already knew the truth of alien visitation to this planet before I heard his claims. The reason I was skeptical is because I was sure that there was no way he, or anyone else in a position like his, would be "allowed" to talk, or even WANT to for that matter.

Why would you willingly give up the coolest job in the world? To be a hero and let humanity in on the secret because they -deserve- to know?

"truth is," he did it for neither of those reasons. Instead he was a scared rat running for his life because he got caught taking his friends out there for a look, and was now being harrased and threatened, and when he tried getting a new job, he discovered that his past was in the process of being erased.

THAT is when he decided to go public. Period.




posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


Your arguments never cease to impress me. Do you have anymore pictures of those unusual pieces of machinery in the pyramids?



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by A51Watcher
-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.


So, -YOU- have seen various alien artifacts, right? And maybe spoke with members of star races?



posted on Mar, 21 2011 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by A51Watcher
-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.


Originally posted by buddhasystem
So, -YOU- have seen various alien artifacts, right? And maybe spoke with members of star races?


Lets review -

In the text you quoted, I see no mention of seeing alien artifacts, or of speaking with members of star races.
In fact those two subjects were not mentioned anywhere in the entire original message.

You must be confused.



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 04:29 AM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


OK then, I am indeed confused. You said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true. That does imply something something concrete, other than the story itself. What is it?



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 05:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by A51Watcher

-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.

"reality is," is that he was indeed telling the truth.


So why does no one at MIT remember, and why is he not in any yearbook from MIT? When exactly did he get his degree from MIT?

How about answering these simple questions - you claim to know....



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 09:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by A51Watcher

-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.

"reality is," is that he was indeed telling the truth.


Originally posted by dereks
So why does no one at MIT remember, and why is he not in any yearbook from MIT? When exactly did he get his degree from MIT?

How about answering these simple questions - you claim to know....



Sure I know
But if I told you.... then I'd have to terminate you.



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 09:32 PM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


You don't seem to be offering any info.



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 09:41 PM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


so your presence on this forum is utterly pointless ?



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


hmm , tell you what - why dont you tell me [ as its sooper dooper secret - mailto : ignorant.ape@gmail.com ]

then ATTEMPT to terminate me



posted on Mar, 22 2011 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


OK then, I am indeed confused. You said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true. That does imply something something concrete, other than the story itself. What is it?


Once again you are confused. You claim I "said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true."
The above statement you innacurately attribute to me, is not what I said.

Please use the quote feature (or cut and paste is fine) when asking a question about what I said.
I will then have a basis in reality to respond to.

(And snarkism's such as star children reveal your questions to be motivated by ridicule, not true curiosity.)

So if you have any real questions based on curiosity (about what I -actually- said), not on cultural icons of ridicule that I obviously never referenced, check the attitude at the door and give it a shot.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 05:12 AM
link   
He also says he has no idea if the information he was given was real or fabricated. He was suspicious about anything he couldn't physically see.



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 07:10 AM
link   
reply to post by LDragonFire
 

im not sure if there was already a comment like this to your question, i didn't have time to read through all of the posts. but 1979 was the dulce firefight



posted on Mar, 23 2011 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by A51Watcher

Originally posted by buddhasystem
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


OK then, I am indeed confused. You said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true. That does imply something something concrete, other than the story itself. What is it?


Once again you are confused. You claim I "said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true."
The above statement you innacurately attribute to me, is not what I said.

Please use the quote feature (or cut and paste is fine) when asking a question about what I said.
I will then have a basis in reality to respond to.


I quoted already and I'll do it again:


-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.


In essence I want to hear what concrete evidence, outside of hearsay, you do have.



posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem

I quoted already and I'll do it again:


-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.


In essence I want to hear what concrete evidence, outside of hearsay, you do have.

He's playing you like a fish Buddah.

He's seen nothing, he knows nothing and he's still on his "duff" eating cheetohs.

harte



posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Harte
 


Exactly, he is pretending to have "insider information" because the Lazar hoax is so easily seen through.



posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Harte
 


Relax, this was meant as a rhetorical question.



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 07:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem
reply to post by Harte
 


Relax, this was meant as a rhetorical question.

I'm relaxed! LOL

It was a rhetorical answer!


Actually, it was an attempt to give, yet again, my opinion. Unwelcome as it may have been.

Harte



posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


john lear - is that you ?



posted on Mar, 26 2011 @ 08:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by buddhasystem

Originally posted by A51Watcher

Originally posted by buddhasystem
reply to post by A51Watcher
 


OK then, I am indeed confused. You said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true. That does imply something something concrete, other than the story itself. What is it?


Once again you are confused. You claim I "said you have convincing evidence that Bob's story is true."
The above statement you innacurately attribute to me, is not what I said.

Please use the quote feature (or cut and paste is fine) when asking a question about what I said.
I will then have a basis in reality to respond to.


I quoted already and I'll do it again:


-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.



Oh I see. You are implying that you have already quoted and that I am somehow incorrect and being difficult.
Let's review then:

Your first post to me:

Originally posted by A51Watcher
-WE- (those of us who checked out his story for ourselves) have a quite different opinion from those of you who have only read about him on the internet.

"So, -YOU- have seen various alien artifacts, right? And maybe spoke with members of star races?"

does indeed contain a quote, followed by insults posed as sarcastic questions.

All posts following that contain NO quotes, only poor attempts at paraphasing what I said.
That is why I want actual quotes, because your track record at paraphrasing has been abysmal.



"In essence I want to hear what concrete evidence, outside of hearsay, you do have."


Oh no foolin huh? I couldn't have guessed. And is that how you normally go about it? Approach a complete stranger, insult them, and then demand answers from them? How is that workin out for ya?


In my book, a rude stranger who insults you and then demands answers from you... "Doesn't deserve the time of day."

So I guess you will have to get your answers vicariously from the replys I give to other members who can at least approach me with a civil tounge.

Fortunately for you, and the peanut gallery chiming in, those answers -have already been posted-

in this very thread and a few others here as replies to other members.


Wow major shock huh. If you had taken the time to read this thread from the beginning, or even the miraculous "read my posts" feature on everyone's profile page, you would already have seen the answers to your questions before you even got started with the insult fest.

The combined investigative feats by yourself and the peanut gallery are indeed impressive, and I'm sure are typical of the amount of rigor applied by the esteemed panel.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 15  16  17    19 >>

log in

join