It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Myendica
reply to post by GoodOlDave
dave, we moved on to other aspects. we left this ted olsen in the dust.. YOU brought it up. dispute something else.. start a new thread..
Originally posted by xavi1000
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Davy boy , you derailng again the thread
back on goverment site
www.vaed.uscourts.gov...
Exhibit Number P200054
it's weird, i show you goverment sites , you are showing me conspiracy sites
Originally posted by xavi1000
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by ATH911
Why did no men call from Flight 77?
There was reportedly 30 adult men on that flight, 6 more than women.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by ATH911
Why did no men call from Flight 77?
There was reportedly 30 adult men on that flight, 6 more than women.
I'd like to know why everyone thinks the unknown calls had to have been Barbara.
Let's see. Out of 54 people only 2 are smart enough or had the insight to call their loved ones? Especially if seatback phones were available.
G-O-D: Is it possible that those unknown calls were made from others?edit on 7-1-2011 by Nutter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
The likelihood that a blizzard of disconnected telephone calls happened to be coming into Ted Olson's office at the same time that a blizzard of disconnected phone calls were coming from flight 77
Originally posted by Nutter
How do we know an unknown call is going to Ted's office?
Or is it just unknown as to the originator?
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by ATH911
Why did no men call from Flight 77?
There was reportedly 30 adult men on that flight, 6 more than women.
I'd like to know why everyone thinks the unknown calls had to have been Barbara.
Let's see. Out of 54 people only 2 are smart enough or had the insight to call their loved ones? Especially if seatback phones were available.
Why is Barbara the automatic phoner out of 52 other people?
G-O-D: Is it possible that those unknown calls were made from others?edit on 7-1-2011 by Nutter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by loveguy
It's not about "joining" us damn fool conspiracy theorists in our fight for resolution that you should let keep you from continued forward progress in these baby-steps to the justice side of the fence.
Ted might have loved her incomprehensibly to those who are not familiar with such a bond.
His testimony was flawed, and without a "proper" investigation, the OS is subjective conjecture.
Do you not agree?
Do I agree we should have more investigations? Certainly. It's one of the most critical moments of US and world history so it should be documented as closely as we can. Heck, we know what happened to the Titanic but subsequent expeditions to the wreck are finding out more and more details all the time, like how the thing was build out of an inferior grade of steel, and that modern steel would laugh off such an impact. What if, somehow, we were able to determine that Hani Hanjour was high on heroin at the time of the hijacking? Wouldn't THAT be a matter of discussion?
Ted Olson's testimony being flawed OTOH is entirely subjective...and mainly from your side. All the OTHER evidence corroborates what Tel Olson says (the phone records, the testimony of Ted Olson's secretary, flight attendant Renee May calling her parents and telling them flight 77 had been hijacked, etc) so insisting Ted Olson's testimony is flawed strikes me as being faith based logic.
It's patently obvious this whole "Ted Olson is lying to cover up the murder of his wife" bit is driven entirely out of the need to believe something else other that flight 77 hit the Pentagon, rather than from any perceived irregularities over the facts. Tell me something, if Ted Olson is lying on those grounds, then doesn't it necessarily mean that Nancy May (the mother of flight attendant Renee May) is lying to cover up the murder of her daughter as well?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by ATH911
Why did no men call from Flight 77?
There was reportedly 30 adult men on that flight, 6 more than women.
I'd like to know why everyone thinks the unknown calls had to have been Barbara.
Let's see. Out of 54 people only 2 are smart enough or had the insight to call their loved ones? Especially if seatback phones were available.
Why is Barbara the automatic phoner out of 52 other people?
G-O-D: Is it possible that those unknown calls were made from others?edit on 7-1-2011 by Nutter because: (no reason given)
The only relatives to say they had calls from AA 77 were Ted Olson and Renee May's parents.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
To whom? The FBI interviewed all of the families and employers of the people on Flight 77. No one else reported receiving calls. Then again, there is the other evidence that Barbara Olson attempted at least 5 phone calls and completed four of them......but for some reason, you keep ignoring it....
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by kaya82
are you going to answer my question dave or continue to dodge it as per usual. Why are people engaging inhis thread he wants to decrease thruther credibiity so we argue amongst are selves dont give him the time of day
I didn't dodge it. I have the facts on my side so I have no need to dodge anyone. I simply didn't see it.
I have said this already...first, ATS isn't a conspiracy web site. It's a conspiracy forum, where people supporting or refuting pretty much every conspiracy there is can come and discuss them. True conspiracy websites I.E. Loose Change have an in-house conspiracy they're peddling and they will promote it jealously up to and including outright censorship. If you don't believe me, log onto the Loose Change web site and start promoting "No Planes" conspiracies, and see how long it takes Dylan Avery to ban you.
Second,, I'm here to point out these conspiracies of yours are NOT based upon any sincere review of the facts, but entirely upon some drivel being shovelled out by those very damned fool conspiracy web sites and it's deliberately causing false public unrest. Your conspiracy movement is so chock full of just plain BAD information, from "No interceptors were scrambled", "no fires in WTC 7", "all the WTC bomb dogs were withdrawn", and now, "it wasn't flight 77 that hit the Pentagon", and from the way it's being edited and presented it's obvious the con artists pushing this stuff out know they're being dishonest.. I'm not here to insult you or to make you feel bad. I'm here to show you how you're being suckered and suckered badly.
Come on, now, in all honestly, doesn't it strike you how odd it is that there are more supposed explanations for this "blatantly a conspiracy" than there were antitrust lawsuits against Microsoft?