It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO captured while shooting High def HDR

page: 3
55
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 08:02 AM
link   
reply to post by kennyb72
 


this is deffently a nice picture taken.beautiful landscape!
but really i think what u caught on that photo is a bird!
if u look at the first picture frame where the object comes flying in u can actually see
something like a wing thats a little off the body.
so most likely a bird, but im not a expert on this so who knows for shure!
i could be wrong! but thx for sharing and u did a really good job on the documentation.




posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 09:54 AM
link   
Stunning pictures!

I must say that without any kind of proper analysis, my first impression was 'bird' only because I have seen this exact shape and movement before in so many images... and those were birds too. Though no one can be 100% certain with such heavily blurred objects, I'd say that the bird explanation has the highest probability of being correct.

IRM



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by kennyb72
 


The clue is in the low shutter speeds that you are filming at. Anything crossing in frame is going to be blurred distorted - such as a bird. You can easily replicate such images yourself. Digital is cheap. If you are an avid photographer then it won't be the last time that you capture fast moving objects in frame at low shutter speeds.

TJ



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 10:51 AM
link   
The one exposure with 1/30 shuttespeed is the cause of that object. Thats slow enough to create that type of blurr



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 11:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by kennyb72
I had no idea I had captured this until I viewed it on my computer.


If this statement is in a post, then the object in the photo is either a bird or a bug. Most likely a bird. Birds blur in digital photos, and the photographer generally doesn't notice birds when shooting. Bird.




posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 11:10 AM
link   
nice capture. it looks to me to be an FS782 terrestrial cruiser. i believe it belongs to the futurian galactic fleet recon squadron from the crab nebula.
edit on 3-1-2011 by anumohi because: lol



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by GEORGETHEGREEK
reply to post by TheFlash
 


Hello Flash


Lets say i am no professional debunker but this kinda photo has become the norm....
I am not definite on anything but i just provide my own personal view.

For more insight on my view please refer here: Odd thing in Photo

Could you please in turn indicate what aspects of the photo are specific to a UFO?


The link = 404 - Not Found.

To answer your question - I never claimed that is was or looked like a UFO, but thank you for the insight your request provides into your observational and deductive abilities.

reply to post by LiveForever8
 


I read the prior replies once again, and no - I did not see any specific information from GEORGETHEGREEK regarding specifics to support his statements that 'it looks like a bird'. If I am mistaken please correct me by citing the appropriate reply(s).



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by kennyb72
 


its a bird I've seen tons of images like this.

its as the wings are back in glide formation.

sorry



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by TheFlash
 



that thread was removed to the rubbish bin as i was informed by a moderator

it was making the whole argument short.

i am not willing to spend too much time on making the point but happily other members seem to share the same view giving some credibility to my approach of "it" being a bird.

Sorry for not being able to engage into a proper debate but it seems things turned out this way

for any complaints speak to a moderator for the matter

take care



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   
some great moderator dug up these photos to help me make the argument i was trying to make reffering to the deleted thread:


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ birds vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv


but thats about it

i have to go just now unfortunatelly but i will catch up later if required

peace!

(by the way these 2 pictures depict birds....)
edit on 3/1/2011 by GEORGETHEGREEK because: better structure of reply

edit on 3/1/2011 by GEORGETHEGREEK because: better structure of reply

edit on 3/1/2011 by GEORGETHEGREEK because: (no reason given)

edit on 3/1/2011 by GEORGETHEGREEK because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


OK, well here is the killer evidence. Something even mainlanders don't know -

There are NO BIRDS in Tasmania!!!!!!!



Not to be a debbie doubter but I do not think the above statement is accurate. I offer proof of what I say not just my opinion.



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by GEORGETHEGREEK
reply to post by TheFlash
 


i am not willing to spend too much time on making the point but happily other members seem to share the same view giving some credibility to my approach of "it" being a bird.

Sorry for not being able to engage into a proper debate but it seems things turned out this way

for any complaints speak to a moderator for the matter

take care


I am not interested in a debate, nor do I have any complaints; I just asked a simple, straightforward question. A question which I may add, for the record, was not answered, but was apparently evaded.

I am interested in the details of the analyses or others about videos such as this. I also believe that it is important to point out when assertions and opinions given by others are without factual basis so that such generally non-expert, personal opinions can be separated from replies and posts having objective and scientific basis.



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 03:05 PM
link   


Looks far away where a flying ship should be.
Perhaps not 300 miles per second but really moving along.
If a ship I wonder if the cloud formations at the bottom and top mean anything.

The cloud looks more linear or with lines on the bottom and perhaps the top
has more of a dispersion about it.
Yeah we seen this before.
Except for birds and bugs that should be cloud free.



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by belsce
 


lol a silver disc shaped bird coooooome on? are u serious?? the first and last are blurred yes however the middle shot is clearly a disc of some sort....



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


OK, well here is the killer evidence. Something even mainlanders don't know -

There are NO BIRDS in Tasmania!!!!!!!



No UFO's either.

Your supporting argument for your own post is the little dob of BS above?
Not impressed.



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by kennyb72
 


Aperture Priority is good for increasing your depth of field, but blurs anything in motion like the bird in your footage.

Here is a good article that explains.

Judging by how out of focus the bird is, it was far closer to you than the in focus background.

After you get more experience you will learn to ignore the birds and bugs. I've been at it for almost 15 years and my Wife is a Pro. To be fair it is a UFO if you don't know what it is, but in this case it's obviously a bird.



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by ommadawn

Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


OK, well here is the killer evidence. Something even mainlanders don't know -

There are NO BIRDS in Tasmania!!!!!!!



No UFO's either.

Your supporting argument for your own post is the little dob of BS above?
Not impressed.


Come on man, you can see how cheerful and open minded the OP is about this, surely you can spot a joke when you see one? he is not saying this is his supporting argument!

Some think it is a bird, (me included being a photographer myself) and some think it is a UFO, this is an open forum after all and everyone is entitled to thier own opinion.

The OP is just after everyones opinion, yours included, I am sure he will be happy enough either way.

Regards S_G



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


OK, well here is the killer evidence. Something even mainlanders don't know -

There are NO BIRDS in Tasmania!!!!!!!







posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Condemned0625
Woah. You might have something there. Definitely does not look like a bird.

interesting
I like" hdr": However:IMHO: I don't think you can say "definitely not a bird"..
Could be a bird. 1/80 second for an object moving across the frame is gonna blur..



posted on Jan, 3 2011 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 



Kandinsky.

I just gave you a star. What immediately made me think when I saw your explanation was the famous Trinidad UFO photo which has been discussed here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Rgds

T



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join