If BoA Isn't Guilty, Then Why are They So Panicked?

Originally posted by Alethea
Their money may not solve the problem this time. For one thing....the monetary system is about to go belly up and they all know it. And the "leverage" of shutting off payments to WL didn't seem to work too good for them because it appears that WL cannot be "bought".

I think we are at the belly up part. China is going to conquer the world via buying it one country at a time instead of land conquest.

China just added Spain to their expanding list of countries they are going to prop up by buying their debt. Eventually we are going to hit the margin call moment, which is the moment all affected countries will change over as another province of China.

Originally posted by be4peace
I just wish that if there is incriminating information on these banks, such as BofA, that Wikileaks would stop playing games. The average citizen doesn't listen to this stuff because it's "CONSPIRACY THEORY".

Speaking of Conspiracy theories this entire fiasco resemble the description of the end times.

Matthew 24:11 "And many false prophets will arise, and will mislead many."

Revelations

The false prophet comes like a lamb, winsomely, with persuasive words that elicit sympathy and good will from others. He may be an extraordinary preacher or orator whose demonically empowered words will deceive the multitudes. But he speaks like a dragon, which means his message is the message of a dragon.

The hairstyle he has could easily hide the horns... (sarcasm)

And no, im not saying Assange is the antichrist. Just pointing out coincidencs...

Maybe the exec Assange was referring to is the beast?

here are a few articles about BOA criminal activities::


criminal-justice-online-courses.blogspot.com...


legalfish.typepad.com...


www.dccriminallawyerblog.com...


Guilty by admission ??

but then again .....

dailybail.com...

At what point were they ever guilty? We are all innocent until proven guilty, including business, Government officals, and even Julian Assange.

Tell that to banks like BoA who often have foreclosed on homes without due process.

I can't believe that this Youtube video from Dec.17, 2010 concerning the mention of banks has only gotten 3377 views. Does anyone have a theory as to why the viewership is so low? Is it really that so many people are unconcerned about what is taking place in the world?

According to Assange, the greatest persecution of WL comes not from governments, but from the banks!

reply to post by Alethea


Perhaps the view count has been "amended" due to "technical problems"?

Perhaps the "Factor of 10 or 100 or 1000" trick has been implemented?

THEY leave no stone unturned during a "panic reaction".

THEY are self proclaimed "pro-activists" at the start, but such childlike poor examples of "reaction" agendas.

THEY don't always plan ahead for unforeseen exposures like this.

THEY seem to forget how to plan and target their "scapegoats" in advance of disaster.

BUT then again, "stupidity" is in fashion these days.

Originally posted by thewholepicture

At what point were they ever guilty? We are all innocent until proven guilty, including business, Government officals, and even Julian Assange.

Tell that to banks like BoA who often have foreclosed on homes without due process.

In which case they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

asked......

Originally posted by Alethea
I can't believe that this Youtube video from Dec.17, 2010 concerning the mention of banks has only gotten 3377 views.

and answered......

Originally posted by Alethea
According to Assange, .....

reply to post by Xcathdra


And how often do they actually take them to court?

Originally posted by thewholepicture
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

And how often do they actually take them to court?

Depending on the crime, and where the company headquarters is located. Check New York, of all States, who generally has a strong AG who go after businesses and corrupton.

If the question is serious I will take the time to research prosecutorial actions taken against businesses. The other thing to keep in mind is in addition to Judicial holding their feet to the fire, Congress is responsible for oversight in several key sectors, and finance is one of them.

Both sides of the aisle have failed spectacularly at the I will add.

Also, the bank has retained the services of consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton to help manage the review.
The report stated that the bank has also sought out advice from several legal firms to ascertain the bank’s potential liabilities in the event of significant disclosures.

www.ibtimes.com...

"to ascertain the bank’s potential liabilities in the event of significant disclosures."

This certainly sounds like an admission of guilt. There has already been so much dirt publicized over the years that now...whatever these leaks may contain...it's all a matter of rushing to implement damage control. These folks must be sweating bullets...wondering which dirty secret will be aired and how critical it will be. Perhaps wondering if it's one of their deeds that has managed to remain hidden so far; wondering if culprits will be named.

Wouldn't this mean that the consulting firm and the lawyers would have to hear confession of all the dirty deeds so they would be able to head off the liabilities of whichever ones are exposed? Wouldn't these teams then be a party to aiding and abetting the wrongdoers? Wouldn't that also make them guilty by association?

reply to post by Alethea


We run into the problem though of whats called "The fruit of the Poisonous Tree". Any lawyer can, and in this case most likely will, argue to exclude any evidence that was obtained and released by wikileaks. The manner the information was obtained and released is illegal, which means any other illegal actions that are exposed by the first will also be excluded.

This is what I have been trying to say about Assanges actions. Its one thing to claim to want to stop corruption and illegal activity while claiming you want people to be held accountible, but under US law the manner in which the info is obtained and being released will fall under the poisonous tree argument, which means in the end, not only will the info be thrown out, no one will held accountible.

He is defeating his own goals.

Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Alethea

 

but under US law the manner in which the info is obtained and being released will fall under the poisonous tree argument, which means in the end, not only will the info be thrown out, no one will held accountible.

He is defeating his own goals.

I understand your point. What is really comes down to is that while it may be against Roman law to heal on the sabbath, it is morally wrong not to.

I will go with moral duty over written law any day.