Originally posted by Condemned0625
I never pointed out what needed to be corrected? I have no idea how many times I've reposted this, but I'll just do it again and again until you
actually retain it:
Her dream specifically predicted the rise in security level in the UK due to terrorist threats (which actually happened, by the
I did point out what needed to be corrected and I corrected it. If you don't see a correction anywhere, it's time for you to pack your school supplies
and revisit an English class.
I snipped out the relevant thing there, hope that you don't get too cross. The remainder of your quote was just your explanation.
What does that say about the Russians bombing Big Ben because of the arrest of Julian Assange? It says "Her dream specifically predicted the rise in
security level in the UK due to terrorist threats", which is a bland generalization, nothing specific at all.
If you took "Her dream specifically predicted the rise in security level in the UK due to terrorist threats" and produced "The Russians will blow up
Big Ben in January of 2011", you've a fine imagination, but I'd say that you're in need of a retraction, more than a correction.
Now, I'm sure that you'll get all whiney and complain that you didn't say that, and you don't answer to me, and so on, so have at it.
Which of these two theories are you in favour of, and what's your basis for believing it?
Well, I could have sworn that I specifically stated that I do not claim with absolute certainty that any of the predictive dreams will be true. I also
specifically stated that I personally witnessed fulfillment of some of her dreams right before my very eyes. Yeah, I can't prove it, but you weren't
here when it happened, so don't play the "You're making it up!" bull#.
Well, what's your explanation for it? I don't really care whether you endorse it or not, but you're testifying that she's able to see the future,
which, scientifically, seems impossible. The reasonable explanation that a skeptic like yourself would promote would be that she just says a bunch of
stuff and you only notice the things that seem to happen, because they're vague enough to be fulfilled, but I don't see you claiming that.
Moderators, don't close my thread. I'm trying to keep this on topic, but there's people like this guy (adjensen) who feel such a strong desire
to throw the entire thing off topic simply because they believe I'm intentionally "lying".
First, I never said that you were lying, I said that you were invalidating your prediction by making it vague when it didn't come to pass. Secondly,
criticism of you or your "predictions" is hardly off-topic -- this is not a soapbox where you say what you like and cannot be criticized for it. If
you can't "nut up" and deal, in an intelligent manner, with people who question your claims, you probably shouldn't be making claims.
Threads such as yours are not closed because of criticism. They might be moved to the "hoax" forum if nothing comes to pass, but I haven't seen this
happen to a prediction, and I would never suggest it anyway. Failed predictions belong in the predictions forum, as testimony to the futility of it,
if nothing else.
edit on 31-1-2011 by adjensen because: oopsies