Solar Activity Watch 2011, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 51 times


reply posted on 14-1-2011 @ 11:18 AM by LDragonFire
reply to post by lasertaglover



This is a great post about the face CME:
Originally posted by Wildeagle
reply to post by ToneDeaf



I can totally see Edvard Munch scream face on the left side!





Nasa warns solar flare....
edit on 14-1-2011 by LDragonFire because: to add link



reply posted on 14-1-2011 @ 11:27 AM by 5senses
reply to post by LDragonFire




Or something positive.. an angel? Christ? All in perception I guess.
Very interesting times however you look at it; literally and figuratively - Keeps us on our toes...


reply posted on 14-1-2011 @ 11:28 AM by Golithion
reply to post by LDragonFire




Looks like the Monty Python God appearing over the sun (Monty Python and the Holy Grail for all who didn't know...I say shame on you!).



reply posted on 14-1-2011 @ 11:58 AM by crazydaisy
reply to post by 5senses



I like the idea of an angel better - I do see the wings!


reply posted on 15-1-2011 @ 03:04 PM by crimvelvet
reply to post by DontTreadOnMe





Last year's Solar Activity Thread was popular, and I thought it would be wise to get a new one ready for 2011.


I do not know if anyone has already mentioned my favorite website Layman's Sunspot Count They came up with a method to try and compare apples to apples as we head into a possible Grand Solar Minimum. They have some great daily pictures of the sun as well as monthly graphs.

They give A BRIEF HISTORY ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE SUNSPOT COUNT.

....The evolution of the sunspot record has made it difficult to formulate a homogeneous record (the SIDC are doing a great job in a difficult arena). Before Wolfer there was mainly one primary observer who was at the mercy of local conditions. Today we have multiple observers that must put upward pressure on the historic counts, the SIDC have 80 observers covering the globe of which 30% are professional. These results are averaged over 24 hours to gain a result. Modern observatories mainly use the same magnification as Wolf's larger telescope but that is the only equal comparison. The aperture lenses are nearly twice the diameter and the focal lengths are more than twice the length of Wolf's 64x scope, the design of the optics is also unknown on the modern scopes which can also make quite a difference, these motor driven, auto cooled/no tube telescopes are a far cry from Wolf's telescopes. Wolf used a 1.5 K factor when using his smaller telescope, but 1.5 x zero is still zero. We must also be aware of modern counting methods that are different to Wolf's method, NOAA have decided to run their own system that is not designed to line up with the past. In essence they do not take on Wolfer's 0.6 reduction factor to account for the small spots and pores that Wolf did not count. NOAA have their method which differs from the historical record that is unfortunately prevalent across many media outlets.

The SIDC count is the internationally accepted standard that follows the Wolfer method. The Waldmeier step is currently built into this standard.

Isolating specks by setting a "Wolf like threshold" and adopting the SIDC count for the groups that make the grade the Layman’s Count although not perfect, attempts to redress some of the modern issues and should compare more favorably to Wolf’s reconstruction of the Dalton Minimum cycles....


The Monthly comparison graph clearly showing the different counting methods. The NOAA method departing from the Wolfer method by not adjusting the raw count (NOAA do not multiply by 0.6). The SIDC using the Wolfer formula (along with the Waldmeier scale factor) which I believe is flawed during times of high speck ratio....

To compare solar cycles we can also use the F10.7 radio flux values that have been recorded since 1947 in Canada. Solar cycle 20 was a weak cycle which is currently looking strong against solar cycle 24. Data is taken from the AU adjusted monthly average values.

SC20 & SC24 have a lot in common, they both experience angular momentum disturbance measured at the Sun. SC24 has a much higher degree of disturbance that will guarantee a lower cycle than SC20 if the theory is correct....



reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:17 AM by logicalview
reply to post by rbkruspe



Looks like it has subsided just in time before it faces earth. Thats not to say it has completely died, more eruptions are possible of course.

ACTIVE SUNSPOT GOES QUIET: A few days ago, sunspot group 1147 was busily launching CMEs from the far side of the sun. Yesterday it turned toward Earth and immediately quieted down. Is this the calm before the storm? Stay tuned.


www.spaceweather.com...
edit on 16/1/11 by logicalview because: Grammar



reply posted on 16-1-2011 @ 03:21 AM by rbkruspe
Originally posted by quakewatcher
NOAA finally got around to posting a warning (I've been expecting one all afternoon, I think they were waiting until I left the house:

www.swpc.noaa.gov...

Active for about the next 18 hours.


I notice they (the SWPC) like to take their sweet time with warnings, alerts and advisories. I usually will check when I KNOW there is (or should be) an event and it shows nothing. Spaceweather is very slow imo for updates as well however they get their data from the SWPC as well so its up to when the website updates. Maybe I am just spoiled on terrestrial weather prediction centers and their prompt outlooks and timely warnings etc.



reply posted on 18-1-2011 @ 04:42 PM by antar
reply to post by logicalview



Makes me think that there are life forms keeping the earth from being harmed...


reply posted on 18-1-2011 @ 06:47 PM by jpsdasnake
reply to post by heineken



That is awesome! thanks for that! i didint knew the software... s for you.


reply posted on 18-1-2011 @ 06:56 PM by crazydaisy
reply to post by lasertaglover



I have never seen Spaceweather not list near earth asteroids with dates, do they think we're afraid or something


reply posted on 18-1-2011 @ 07:10 PM by Lil Drummerboy
Originally posted by crazydaisy
reply to
post by lasertaglover



I have never seen Spaceweather not list near earth asteroids with dates, do they think we're afraid or something
are you speaking of the fact that the page is blank for the listings?


reply posted on 18-1-2011 @ 07:10 PM by jpsdasnake
reply to post by lasertaglover



when i saw it,i tought they are now displaying only the "incoming" asteroid encounters,not the past ones,like they used to.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 2 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags