Simple, then USA and UK will strike back with the backing of the United Nations.

Don't forget, the UK is also a Commonwealth Country, so the UK at least would have the backing of the Commonwealth as well. Plus, in all probability, the European Union.

The UK might be a small island nation these days, but it is remarkably well protected because of ties to NATO, the Commonwealth, and the EU.

I can't imagine any country with the nerve to invade the USA, but I could be wrong. Most know how unstable our civilians are, not to mention how large our country is. We are a well armed country, and I don't just mean the military. Aside from that, the USA, UK, and NATO would certainly strike back and that would be the end of who ever decided to cross them. End of story.

I've thought about it for a while, WWIII, it will be the combination of all of our current conflicts and issues, and China is preparing for it, because they see themselves as the next great nation. The NWO has prepared them for that role, but that's for another forum. WWIII will be as follows:
Allies:
USA
UK
Japan
Australia
New Zealand
American Iraq
South Korea

Axis(Don't know what else to call them)
Iran
(Insert here) -istan
China
Jihadist Iraq
Vietnam
Laos
Cuba
Russia (They're all still Communists at heart)
North Korea

That's most of the big ones. The Communists will have joined forces with the radical Muslims(Notice I said RADICAL Muslims, Political Correctness Police) because of a common enemy. The war could start a variety of ways. Most involve nukes, as I'm sure will be involved. China could nuke us. Or they could force us into a slow economic downfall and destroy our fighting capability, but after WWIII, all debt is null and void, I'm sure. Iran could nuke us, and how disappointed would president Alphabet be if the 12th Imam doesn't show up? North Korea could nuke us, but we could carpet bomb the whole country in 10 minutes, so that would be stupid. North Korea could nuke South Korea, and chaos ensues. The US, I believe will split into two sides, and the military will probably side with capitalism, so we stand a pretty good chance. The UN will most likely be dissolved at that point, as will the EU, in which it will be all countries against Romania. The key will be to defeat China first, because they will be the Axis' economic powerhouse to supply their war machine. This war will truly decide the fate of the world, and if won by the Allies, will solve all of the world's current problems.

With the ammount of cutbacks the UK has made to the military china could send 5 ships at us with 50 men and take the country in a week...get a good leader incharge then ask the same question when the military gets the proper backing and money they need to be great again

I think an attack is proving more likely each time, maybe not an attack on US or UK soil but definitely on Korean soil. North Korea just don't know when to stop annoying other countries and threatening them with silly airstrikes that end up achieving nothing more than a few hours of news coverage. I can't ever see an attack or invasion by the Koreans/China especially in the US or UK - our countries are miles ahead of everyone else in terms of technology. Man power isn't everything - surely China and North Korea must realise that.

I cannot believe how absurd you people are. What is wrong with you?

Over more than 5000 years of Chinese history, Chinese nation never ever attacked a foreign nation, that is a historical fact, and if you think is not true, please attempt to disprove me.

Communism (in Mainland) and Democracy (in Taiwan) and Qing dynasty before them. Those three things almost completely ruined China, that's why all this is happening. Qing dynasty is not a Chinese dynasty, it is a Manchurian one. They got to the throne not alone, but Chinese general in Ming dynasty named Wu Sangui betrayed Chinese people and he allowed Manchurians to enter China, he gave many deception orders to Chinese military so northern China was completely available to enter without even a small resistance. Then he helped Manchurians take over the rest while giving wrong orders to Ming army. That's how it all began, and please, learn history. You are the main threat, not Chinese people.

China and North korea invading USA and UK.

The biggest laugh Ive had on this site!

1) the US have enough ballistic (don't mean nuclear) missiles to wipe out China's navy & air force and North Korea's navy nd air force.

2) China and North Korea do not have the logistics to get to the UK let alone the States. Could you imagine North Korea's army driving through Europe? Neither can I! "herro! We're on our way to destroy those stupid British". EU says "turn around and go home or you will be wiped of theface of this planet"

3) Britain would bring her glorious army to around 400k atleast which would be powerful enough to take on anyone in the world.

4) the US build up in the Pacific region is enough to pin down the north Koreans and the Chinese for reinforcements to arrive.

5) the south Koreans would kick the Norths backside. Japan would do considerable damage to China's defences.

6) the combination of the UK (4th largest navy in the world) and the us (1st largest navy in the world) navies would cripple both air, sea and land defences of ANY nation in the world.

7) China would be sanctioned to sh!t which completely destroy their economy.

8) north Korea are poor and have no allies bar the Chinese.

The UK and US alliance can take on the world if we had to. But we won't need to.

Originally posted by Zander2533
I cannot believe how absurd you people are. What is wrong with you?

Over more than 5000 years of Chinese history, Chinese nation never ever attacked a foreign nation, that is a historical fact, and if you think is not true, please attempt to disprove me.

In the 20th century?

Tibet. Korea. India. Vietnam.

If the hypothetical attack comes in the form of a ballistic missile salvo, the US / UK response will more than likely be best described as "Payment in kind, with interest", with follow-up attacks by the USAF bomber fleet, and a diplomatic initiative in the UN. Among their other down-sides, ballistic missiles are very easy to back-track to their launch points, so there won't be any real question of who provoked whom.

If the attack doesn't include ballistic missiles, and stops short of actual territorial invasion, there will probably be a tacit agreement not to go nuclear. Unfortunately for the Chinese and North Korean forces, unless the USN and USAF are really wearing their idiot hats, the result is going to be a severe mauling for the China / Korea alliance force. I'm not being a jingoistic America-phile here, believe it or not...the simple fact is that any non-ballistic attack from China or Korea to the US has to cross the Pacific ocean, and neither China nor North Korea has sufficient blue-water combat capability to beat the US Navy in a no-holds-barred fight.

If the attack (by some miraculous happening more in line with a Harry Turtledove novel than with realistic expectations) does include an actual invasion of the US or UK, it's going to turn into an even bigger, more expensive disaster than the blue-water attack mentioned above. For one, there will still be the need to clear an invasion pathway, with the attendant mauling of the attacking force. Once that bloody task is done, the Chinese/Korean forces will have to come ashore in the face of fairly robust land-based response. Assuming that the C/K forces can open a beachhead (not by any means a given), they then face the task of resupplying over a several-thousand-miles long supply corridor which *will* be contested by every submarine, strike aircraft, drone, and rowboat the US and UK can throw at it, while the troops ashore face not only the (considerable) combat power of the US Army and Marine Corps, but the reserve forces from both branches, along with police units (some of which are armed and trained to paramilitary standard) and an armed populace (which will make up in numbers and enthusiasm what it lacks in pure firepower and training).

In short, the *best* outcome the Chinese or Koreans can reasonably expect is an embarrassing defeat with heavy losses and bad feelings all around. The balance of power doesn't favor such an action, and the logistics are nightmarish.

If the Chinese are determined to take military action against the US, they'd probably be better off playing the "short game" and setting their sights on Taiwan and the Philippines.

Well, as the french hate the British, they would join in on the Chinese side, that's if the Brits don't notice they are being invaded, (intelligence satellite down that day?) The yanks will watch carefully to see how the Brits do, then when the Brits start to kick +as, the yanks will ask if the Brits would like their help, for a price, quite right too.
(well, that's how it usually works, right?)

Probaly not it would for sure get very dirty maybe the use og chemical and bio weapons good way of reducing population , just wat they want !