It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not sure which mogul flight detected that, but it makes sense they would verify if Mogul worked detecting US nuclear tests before trying to detect Soviet tests. So the southwestern desert may be a suitable location to test for an explosion in the Pacific, to prove the concept.
At the time, 1947, the United States was concerned with listening for nuclear testing by other countries, especially the Soviet Union, so the microphone-bearing balloons were launched to listen for the sounds.
The experiment succeeded in detecting U.S. nuclear tests in the South Pacific, 6,000 miles away
I don't know if that claim is true but if so, perhaps Mogul wouldn't have been capable of detecting that first soviet test? Or maybe it wouldn't have been as conclusive?
The Soviet Union tested its first nuclear weapon at 7:00 a.m. local time on August 29, 1949....
The Americans knew too, within days. The Soviets had kept the test under tight security, but the U.S. Air Force’s airborne observers showed conclusively that a nuclear explosion had taken place. The technique they used had been developed just in time; even two years earlier it would have been beyond the state of the art.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by Anunaki10
That's right, to keep an open mind is a good thing www.abovetopsecret.com...
That thread is not by an open-minded person. That thread is the result of conspiracy, insufficient research, a failure to grasp what was going on in 1947 politics- and military-wise, gullibility, fantasy-proneness, and the will to believe because belief requires no evidence.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by spacevisitor
#1=sticks
#2=foil
#4=tape
Still looks like balloon debris to me, maybe with some embellishments.
Kinda like my hands get a little bit wider each time I retell the story about that big fish I caught
And the last line of wishful thinking and hopeful desperation, is to say flying saucers are human technology 100%.
I'm glad you got my point. If you ask someone about something right after it happens, that's your best chance of getting closest to the truth.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
That is what we in Holland call nothing more than “fishing stories”.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm glad you got my point. If you ask someone about something right after it happens, that's your best chance of getting closest to the truth.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
That is what we in Holland call nothing more than “fishing stories”.
Just about anybody, recalling details from 30 years earlier, is going to misremember some details, and may embellish the story such that maybe the fish they caught wasn't really as big as they claim 30 years later, or maybe the foil wasn't really as magical as their faded memory thinks. Now if someone has a photo of the fish they caught, that's better than a faded memory and it makes it hard to make the fish any bigger when they retell the story.
Likewise, if Marcel had kept a little piece of the magical debris (and considering how many pieces he says there were and how large the debris field was, I'm sure nobody would have ever missed it) then he'd be able prove he's not telling a "fish story" about the magical properties.
But I have to say, the magical properties sound like a fish story to me. It was foil, and he said it was foil.
But instead of making the fish a little bit bigger than it really was, he just gave the foil some magical properties.
At least it seems that way to me mostly because of the inconsistency of finding such a supposedly indestructible material in thousands of pieces. I don't think anybody can be sure since he didn't bother to save a piece to verify his claim. But it is an extraordinary claim, and certainly lacking in extraordinary evidence. He had the stuff in his hands, all he had to do was save a piece, nobody would have missed it.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by backinblack
Thanks for the link, I saw that thread. I really like it, see how many of those sightings just prior to Roswell refer to disks? And people wonder how they came up with the word "disc" to describe what Marcel described. Marcel's description of the debris field sounds nothing like a disc to me, but it's easier for me to understand how the Roswell folks might have come up with that word, when I read that thread about all the prior disk sightings.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
If you ask someone about something right after it happens, that's your best chance of getting closest to the truth.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Likewise, if Marcel had kept a little piece of the magical debris (and considering how many pieces he says there were and how large the debris field was, I'm sure nobody would have ever missed it)
A third point which doesn't make much sense, if the Air Force theory is correct, is that Jesse Marcel and his family kept some of the debris after the incident and even showed it to the Cavitts.
Mary Cavitt, Sheridan Cavitt's wife, sat in on the Air Force interview, just as she had done during Randle and Schmitt's interviews.
At two points,she stated that Jesse brought out material when the Cavitts were visiting.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
then he'd be able prove he's not telling a "fish story" about the magical properties.
Thanks, I didn't know that!
Originally posted by spacevisitor
It seems that he actually had some debris in his possession for some time, as there is spoken of here.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Thanks, I didn't know that!
Originally posted by spacevisitor
It seems that he actually had some debris in his possession for some time, as there is spoken of here.
So what happened to it?
That would be, as the title of the thread suggests, "The smoking gun".
Yeah I'll bet he regrets it:
Noted UFOlogist and "Alien Hunter," Derrel Sims, speaks with Dr. Russell Vernon Clark for the latest information regarding the RR3 object...
"Numerous bogus claims have been made "long after it was scientifically proven" that the piece was very terrestrial! Why these claims continue should be obvious to your readers. The science is in…I just checked (again!) with numerous scientists on this "find"."
"The RR3 Specimen" is not a part or piece of a UFO. I now wish I had never seen the object or been a party to this seemingly endless attempt to make this object into something it is not.
Do you think that might be the reason the conference was canceled? Because he first thought the isotopic ratio was evidence that it was not terrestrial, but it turned out to not be the case after getting peer review feedback?
Dr. Vernon Clark was so impressed with the find of extraterrestrial isotopic ratios from the object that he went to Roswell and together we presented a full lecture on the RR3 piece at the New Mexico Military Institute....
Unfortunately, the evidence did not stand up to peer review. He was later notified that his job position was no longer needed at UCSD. Technically he wasn't fired…they just gave "the hint" that his position was closed down. This really smacks of "punishment".
The question that later came up with peer review was:
"Can isotopic ratios be altered in manufactured materials?"
Apparently, the answer is "Yes." Even the skeptics agree to that.
In other words, the object could have been manufactured here on earth and the isotopic ratios could be altered.
I think that may have something to do with cancellation of the conference for the extraterrestrial announcement?
It is important to remember here that Dr. Vernon Clark reversed his position after reviewing the additional input of information from his peers and the results of additional testing. To this day, he has retained that reversed position.
So armed with that revelation, I have to conclude that the youtube clip you posted is one of the most misleading pieces of deception I've seen, though unfortunately that's not too uncommon in the UFO field.
these analyses indicate that the major constituents of T1/T2, T3 and RR3 have isotopic ratios that are at this level of analysis indistinguishable from normal terrestrial...
Some pretty amazing scientists have analyzed the material and many more have given input after studying the results of the testing. The fact is that tests by Stanford Scientists, Lab tech reviews in Dallas and NASA (through independent testing) and York University in Toronto agree…the final tests are indicating there are no ET isotopes in "The RR3 Specimen."