It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by saltheart foamfollower
# If all cultures are equal, why doesn’t UNESCO organize International Cannibalism Week festivals?
# Why do those demanding “equal pay for equal work” never protest against “equal pay for little or no work”?
# Why has no politician ever run on men’s issues or promised to improve the lives of males?
# If all beliefs are equally valid, how come my belief in the absurdity of this maxim gets rejected by its proponents?
# Ever noticed that for the past thirty years, we’ve been hearing we have less than ten years to save the planet?
# Once a politician labels the truth as hate speech, can anyone trust him to speak the truth afterward?
# If a politician gets elected by the poor on a promise to eliminate poverty, wouldn’t fulfilling his promise destroy his voting base? Wouldn’t he rather benefit from the growing numbers of poor people? Isn’t this an obvious conflict of interests?
From one of my favorite authors, a former citizen of the USSR, just a couple questions for you to answer.
Like socratic questions, how bout answering these, if you dare?
Question Insanity: What to Ask Progressives
My addition to the questions-
If you hated Bush soooo much-
Why would you give more POWER to the very government that someone like him, could become in power again, hell his brother Jeb is thinking of running.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by kimar
2. I don't know anybody who promotes "equal pay for no work."
I'll stop you right there.
Know anyone that belongs to a union?
I do and can tell you plenty of first-hand accounts of what I call "shuffling about" to make it appear as if they are working, but really are not - for equal pay.
Originally posted by nivekronnoco
reply to post by MMPI2
These 'questions' are infantile and moronic.
They have no basis in reality,they do nothing but clearly illustrate your inability to understand any of the political terms you are using.
Seriously ,pick up a book...seek education....Turn off Beck...
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
Anyone that still thinks the questions have gone unanswered should just read Heff's posts
No one has answered these questions. More specifically, no one has formulated an answer that is honest and addresses the substance of the issues presented. The only legitimate answers to ANY of the questions posed is a very simple: "I didn't know that" or "I don't know the answer to that question."
The reasons that an "I didn't know that" or an "I don't know the answer to that" response are the only possible legit answers are as follows:
1) Most "progressives" have no idea about or conception of the history of the ideology they support. They are clueless. The democrat party is based in racism, hate, and elitism that sought to trample the rights of others. The "progressive" agenda has been a masterfully crafted psychological operation that has duped millions. Your rank and file progressive, if he understood this, would run screaming from the poison ideology he supports.
2) Any response other than "I didn't know" requires "deconstruction". Deconstruction of these questions implies that the respondent is denying reality, is glossing over the brutality of the true progressive agenda through distraction and denial, and is PERPETUATING "LIBERAL" LIES IN A CONSCIOUS AND DELIBERATE WAY.
The facts are clear and undeniable. Liberals/Progressives and their desires to control others are at the heart of every anti-human act in modern history. Eugenics, Nazism, Communism, genocide, genetic poverty, chronic underclasses, statism and racism lies at the feet of the progressive
NAZI is an acronym for Nationalsozialismus, which translates into English as "National Socialism". The socialist party and the democratic party are, in the u.s., one and the same - very much like Hitler's political, ideological military and paramilitary structures.
In many respects, modern democrats and the fascists of the last century have most of the same tenets. Barack obama's actions with regards to nationalization of the car, medical, banking and education industries are textbook fascist, and are a good example of this fact.
Moreover, if you study political ideologies, "right-wing" and "left wing" are passe and hackneyed terms that are meaningless. What you might consider hardcore "rightists" and hardcore "leftists" are best characterized as "statists" A statist believes that an elite group of leaders should rule the populace. Adolph Hitler was a statist. Josef Stalin was a statist. Barack Obama is a statist. To a much lesser extent, G W Bush was a statist. However, he was nowhere near as hardcore as Hitler or Obama.
If you are interested in this stuff, read Mark Levin's excellent "Liberty versus Tyranny." It is a seminal work on the lies the statist/liberal tells to maintain power over his fellow man.
Originally posted by glome
reply to post by saltheart foamfollower
Have you read the constitution? Anything not protecting in the bill of rights is fair game. You do understand that, don't you?