It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Masonic History and Hidden Agenda Revealed: The Curse of Canaan

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 10:18 AM

Originally posted by JoshNorton

Originally posted by GirlGenius
Very interesting at any rate. I can see that this is where Alex Jones, Alan Watt and a number of other radio personalities got some of their material.

Not at all... they may have gotten it from the same sources that this guy did, but I didn't really see much in the way of original research on the part of the author... just rehashing other people's stuff and putting his own biblical spin on things.

Actually, all Alan Watt does is rehash other people's material. This is fairly endemic within so-called conspiracy research, but Watt's "information" is a smushed up amalgam of the work of Bill Cooper, Michael A. Hoffman II & Glen Kealey primarily (the latter in particular), a dash of the esotericist Manly P. Hall (probably via Kealey, mostly), Andrew M. Lobaczewski's Political Ponerology elite psychopath hypthesis, the "la technique" theory of the French sociologist/philosopher Jacques Ellul, and, according to someone I know who is very aware of his work, much of Eustace Mullins.
I have yet to read any Mullins so I won't comment personally on that.

Everyone is influenced by those they read but Watt has never done an ounce of original investigation in his life. Conspiracy guru and fraud, like many, many, many in the conspiratainment field. He's gravitated to that other pseudo-truthteller and demagogue Alex Jones now hasn't he?

posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 09:43 PM
Thanks for the book link, stuff like this is interesting. S + F

2nd line


posted on Jan, 2 2011 @ 11:58 AM
reply to post by emsed1

I agree. I was totally turned off to Alex for a long time. My husband would listen to him a lot and I would complain that he was listening to ranting nut jobs - shock jocks! My husband told me to listen to what he was saying and I started to listen to him, too. Without my husband's input, I would have totally dismissed him. That was in 2006. I knew a lot about government corruption and media control before Alex, but he did help me understand that there was an ancient level to it all. Even though he provides good information most of the time, I have never recommended Alex Jones' show to anyone because of his idiotic rantings and propensity toward exaggeration. I've handed out many copies of Freedom to Fascism over the years.

People complain that Jones doesn't expose the Jews enough, but as outlined in Mullins' book (and other sources), it's really the Canaanites, the "black nobility". The Jews, like masons and other groups, are just easy vehicles for exploitation. This Mullins book is great because it is a concise summary of the whole history of this insanity.

posted on Jan, 2 2011 @ 12:07 PM
reply to post by Extant Taxon

Yes, I've gotten pretty tired of Watt and stopped listening to him over a year ago. He just repeats himself (when he is not begging) and complains of people ripping his work off, which as you say is just a rehash of the work of others.

I think Mullins book is a pretty good synopsis. I am not a religious person (although I believe in God and the teachings of Christ) but I do think the bible has some historical value bearing in mind that its contents have been corrupted and distorted to a certain extent. I would not be surprised to find out there is more literal truth to the bible than many care to admit. I do get frustrated by what we don't know and what has been kept hidden from the masses. I've always been sure that the most important books in the library of Alexandria (and other knowledge that was said to have been "destroyed") were stolen and have been kept hidden.

posted on Jan, 2 2011 @ 12:55 PM
reply to post by GirlGenius

People complain that Jones doesn't expose the Jews enough, but as outlined in Mullins' book (and other sources), it's really the Canaanites, the "black nobility". The Jews, like masons and other groups, are just easy vehicles for exploitation. This Mullins book is great because it is a concise summary of the whole history of this insanity.

Just to clarify, from what I understand, the Jews ARE Canaanites, according to Mullins.

Mullins seems to borrow his "theology" from British-Israelism, which tries to reinterpret history from the vantage point of of the triumphant British Empire. In this system, it is white people, most specifically Anglo-Saxons, who are the "true" sons of Shem, while the darker races, as well as those calling themselves "Jews" today, are considered as being from the line of Ham.

A clue in Mullins' writing is when he tells us that both Pharisees and Sadducees were Edomites, who are a subset of Canaanites.

The other clue as to "who" he is talking about is his use of the term "Venetian". As in, "The Merchant of Venice". At this point, he has narrowed it down to Jewish families who have dominated banking for the last 600 years.

I think using the term "black nobility" can get confusing, but from Mullins' perspective, it makes especially good sense, since Ham is the father of the dark races as well.

In the US, the Christian Identity movement has carried on with this theology, although other groups also adhere to versions of this, such as the Mormons, who were prone to accepting this kind of paradigm already, due to their similar interpretations of the three sons of Noah.

Interesting info, and personally I think Mullins has a lot to offer the more open minded, but I don't care for the theology.


posted on Jan, 2 2011 @ 08:30 PM
reply to post by JR MacBeth

Yes, you are correct. Today's "Jews" are demonic pretenders, according to Mullins, although many Jews do not embrace their demonic roots ("We will know "them" by their deeds"). Indeed, the truly demonic amongst them, like Kissinger or the Rothschilds, have a history of disregard for all human life, including Jews as far as I can tell.

posted on Jan, 4 2011 @ 08:48 PM
reply to post by GirlGenius

GG, where are all the outraged Jews?

I thought maybe your thread was going to get going here, but even the masons seem to be holding off.

Well, figured I'd give you a bump. Even though I'm not into the theology of it all, trying to tie various modern peoples to ancient ones, I still think Mullins makes some good points.

"Whoever" todays Jews are, they are leading the parade, and where we're headed doesn't look so pretty.

Did it all start with an ancient "curse"? Probably not. Jews are a group with a strong identity, and whether or not their past plays a part, the present suggests they are very "usable", as such. Merely possessing such a strong identity is enough to have them targeted, and harnessed.

My paradigm doesn't put "Canaanites", or Jews at the center of the problem. Instead, it's the blue-bloods, the royals, the nobility who I see as the "obvious" problem we all face. But this elite has "chosen" the Jews to play a critical role in our subjugation, and what is perhaps irritating is that they seem to be playing their part with too much pleasure. If they could only realize how dispensable they are! The world hates them already, when their usefulness is over, they will pay. And our true masters, they will surely laugh.

Maybe "Satan" is behind it all, who am I to say? But I honestly don't see the need to go there. The world is plausible enough as it is, by simply looking at "who" we see in our history books. Kings and queens, nobles who continue to have a tremendous material stake in our world. Of course they are looking after their interests, and everything we see is a result of that. Including the harnessing of the Jews.

There is a hidden agenda I believe, because our masters can't exactly tell us that their big plan is a big ugly Plantation. That's what we're heading for, IMO. The Jews are doing their part to herd us in that direction, not even realizing what part they are playing. When we get there, there won't be that many Jews required to keep the slaves in control, perhaps they should think about that. But if the Bible is any indication, the "Jews" don't have to be Pharaoh. They are content being Joseph, first minister, doing the master's bidding, but never really being the master.

But Joseph should take heed: The slaves will one day want revenge, and few will even bother with Pharaoh, if they can take out their anger on Joseph.


posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 04:28 PM
reply to post by JR MacBeth

Well, I think even the Jews are starting to realize that the Zionists are a real threat. Most are too afraid to denounce them but now they are wary of seeming to align themselves with them. The S is going to HTF in the not-too-distant future and innocent Jews are going to be swept up in the retribution as it has been throughout history. Now is the time for everyone to speak out and denounce those that are unjustly oppressing others and facilitating this disastrous direction we are taking.

I am a little at a loss with regards to the biblical connections Mullins makes in the first part of the book but there may be more fact interwoven in biblical writings than we understand. There is something going on that is taking place on a metaphysical level. It took me a long time to come to grips with that. It goes beyond evil psychopaths taking over; it is a root struggle of good vs. evil. It may have started with an ancient curse or it may be something that is fueled by people selling their souls and committing evil to pass an initiation and get ahead. Evil is embraced and then it takes over like a cancer. Is it important to identify the root cause? I think so. We have to understand the nature of evil so that we can understand the ways that it corrupts and avoid the pitfalls. And this type of evil is being studied in a scholarly way ... ponerology. I don't know much about this field or if they delve much into metaphysical etiology. I do know that we can hit a wall if we explore only with a reductionist philosophy.

edit on 5-1-2011 by GirlGenius because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 06:25 PM
reply to post by GirlGenius

Evil is embraced and then it takes over like a cancer. Is it important to identify the root cause? I think so. We have to understand the nature of evil so that we can understand the ways that it corrupts and avoid the pitfalls.

I guess it's good that "evil" is being examined today from other viewpoints, because the religious ones are getting a bit old.

Not that religious insights are completely without merit. Certainly, the intuition that there is something inherently "wrong" with people, call it a "fallen nature", or whatever, this rings true. But too many religionists go to defcon 4, and out comes "Satan", when things get so ugly that we dare not look too closely in the mirror.

I tend to think that "the devil" is more a cop-out than anything else. The closer we look at "evil", the more we find rather mundane explanations, such as selfishness.

That being said, I still wouldn't want to oversimplify, and just leave evil as "merely" human. Is there another "dimension", higher beings (like angels, or demons)? Could be, and we could call them other things, but the point would remain, that there may very well be things beyond mere human factors.

Since I have looked into the occult, it does seem that there could be something there that humans encounter primarily in the pursuit of what we call wealth and power. You mentioned, "selling your soul", and I can see something like that truly perverting a person. How often does this happen? Possibly a whole lot. Are these the people running this mess of a world right now? Well, I can sure see that is a distinct possibility!

Obviously if there is another dimension beyond what we typically see, it would explain a whole lot. BUT, the rationalist in me continues to say we don't necessarily have to go there. So much seems perfectly explainable without having to pull out "the devil".

Powerful people, especially those spoiled by multigenerational power and wealth, seem to be vulnerable to the very same corruption that any of us might face, if we were in their shoes. Would we also resort to "punishing" our enemies, even unto death, or getting "even", or just taking what we wanted, simply because we could? Well, that's the way of humanity, regardless of who we start out pretending to be. The nobles simply start out farther down that same road of corruption we all might find ourselves on, given the same opportunities.

Over time, the multigenerational "corruption" I'm talking about, would probably tend to morph into many of the things we see. Secret societies, religions intentionally subverted, hopeless political systems, an entire world economy based on fraud, massive wars started to further the goals of the elite. All rather easily explained by compounded human failings, IMO.

Anyway, thanks GG for starting this thread! I think there's a lot of very deep issues that can be explored. Perhaps others will come along shortly and share their insights.


posted on Jan, 5 2011 @ 07:06 PM
Nesta Helen Webster is the granddaddy or grand mammy of all the conspiracy anti-Masonic-Illuminati, Jewish Kabala, Satanic, Babylonian brotherhood stuff, now personified by Dave Icke and Alex Jones types.

The seminal book though in this era was "Pawns in the Game"

by William Guy Carr, who really is the granddaddy of the conspiracy theories regarding the Illuminati.

Mullins and those two are the true founders of this 20th century conspiracy phenomenon, that has given us all the modern conspiracy theorists like Jones, Icke, Jeff Rense and many othes.

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 05:22 PM
I have a few issues with this book.

It says, basically, that there was a race war between Jews and Black Africans that goes back to Biblical times. Nimrod was an evil Black king who was killed by righteous Shem. The Jews built the pyramids and were persecuted for bringing civilization to the Black Egyptians. Shem was the Sun of Ra and the face of the Great Sphinx, whereas Ham practiced human sacrifice and cannibalism (fooled into doing so by Naamah, the sister of Tubalcain). The book fails to mention that it was the African Jethro who encountered Moses during the Exodus, taught him to worship YHWH and gave his daughter Zipporah to marry.

It then explains that the concept of genocide originated with the Will of Canaan, which called for the extermination of the Jews.

The book talks about interesting findings in a temple to Ashtoreth (to whom Solomon's Temple was also erected) in Gezer, as written in Halley's Bible Handbook. Robert Macalister ( + Ba'al = Ally McBeal?) discovered containers filled with bones of children who were burned alive between 4 and 12 years old, a great number of stone phalluses, as well as pornographic plaques of Ashtoreth with exaggerated breasts. He also discovered "foundation sacrifices": a family's new house would be blessed after their firstborn child was stuffed into a wall. Jews living in Canaan practiced the Canaanite religion, as described in 2 Kings 16. Tel-Gezer is also the name of a kibbutz in modern Israel which was founded near the location of the ancient city.

Even though they are credited with creating one of the earliest alphabets, the Canaanites didn't write down much of their own history. At the point in time when they traded with the Greeks they were called Phoenicians, which comes from a name given to them by Homer. Nobody knows exactly what the name means. Some say that it refers to Tyranian purple, royal purple or tekhelet (a rare dye used for ceremonial Jewish ponchos), but this is not entirely plausible. The word Φοίνικες ("phoinikes") means more like blood-red than purple. Some say that it refers to the ruddy complexion of Middle Easterners, or even to Irish red hair.

Further, Mullins wrote, "those who remain true to Christ are the Semites." I suppose you can't confuse Eustace Mullins for a Zionist, then, unless he used the word "Christ" as a simply metaphor. He then characterizes "the people of Shem" as "fair-haired, fair-skinned" and "blue-eyed," and Canaanites as stereotypically Middle Eastern, usually with government license to engage in racketeering.

He begins Chapter 2 by explaining that the words "coon" and "Cajun" derive from Kajin, a variant of the name of Cain. Nevermind that the word "Cajun," in fact, derives from Acaddian. A few paragraphs later, he describes Cain's marriage with a Nachash (pre-Adamite) woman. Mullins explains the name Nachash to be related to a serpent's utterance of the word Negro, the Hebrew word for ape, and the Arabic word for Devil.

One of the biggest blunders in this book is to relate Shem with Set who cut Osiris into pieces, which he scattered.

Mullins further makes some interesting points, such as that courts in Virginia will rule unfavorably against anyone who represents himself pro se, or who has property that is coveted by a Freemason. He also explains that the oral Talmud was created by Canaanite slaves in Babylon who had forgotten their old traditions because of widespread inter-tribal marriage.

The book's rantings about the Kabalah being "anti-life" should not completely disregarded. When you read the theories of the various Jewish authorities—such as the Midrash, the Sepher Yetzira, and the Kohar—they all speak glaringly about the metaphysical and abstract concepts of the universe, whereas the Torah basically commands men to help repair the universe (and society) by obeying the mitzvoth. And they all use categories and numbered lists, which has become something of a trend among "self-help gurus."

Mullins then mentions that W. Wynn Westcott founded the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which is interesting, because he also wrote the first English translation of the Sepher Yetzirah.

The statement that the 26th degree of the Scottish Rite calls for Luciferian worship is not completely true. The ritual says that Jesus went to hell before ascending to heaven, which is almost like calling Jesus a fallen angel or a redeemed Devil. The ritual tries to make it seem like Jesus going to hell was some kind of test of His character, but it's not. It's saying, basically, that Jesus is a dualistic deity.

Anyone who is turned off by the racist ramblings in the book is likely to miss the information presented in its bulk. The book mentions that "Lord Sackville" (doesn't specify who) established the first Masonic lodge in Turin, Italy in 1733 (this is wrong - Charles Sackville instituted the lodge in Florence). In 1864, Giuseppe Garibaldi united the three main Italian lodges (Florence, Turin and Palermo) into a Scottish Rite grand orient (Mullins mentions Napoli, which was actually the headquarters of the Carbonari). Garibaldi developed such a reputation that Abraham Lincoln offered to make him Commander-in-Chief of the US Army.

After the Civil War, the Peabody Fund became the Southern Education Fund, then eventually the Rockefeller Foundation. George Peabody & Co. became J.P. Morgan & Co.. Mullins also explains the role of Daniel Coit Gillman at the ground floor of several of the secret societies which now form America's shadow government. One of the founding members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve was Frederic A. Delano, whose []father Isaac[/url] made a fortune selling opium. His nephew—Franklin Delano Roosevelt—appointed him as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, then Vice-Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

In Chapter 4, Mullins explains the link between Karl Marx, the Freemasons and the Zionist movement. Reform Judaism started as an inner circle of a Masonic lodge attended by Jews. The "Protocols of Zion" were originally published as Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu by Maurice Joly (Wikipedia does not treat him kindly). The "Protocols" were printed after the Jewish Synod of Leipzig in July 1869, the Kattowitz Conference of Hoveve Zion in 1884, the Odessa Conference of Hoveve Zion in 1883 and the B'nai Moshe conference. The "Kattowitz papers" were passed from a Mizraim lodge in Paris to Russian intelligence, then to the B'nai B'rith in New York.

In 1860, Albert Pike was allowed to be the head of American Masonry with the blessing of Giuseppe Mazzini, only 10 years after Pike was first initiated, and 12 years after the League of the Just comissioned Marx to write the Communist Manifesto. Marx got his theories about workers' wages from David Ricardo, the son of Abraham Israel (a prominent Jew from Amsterdam). A theory related to what Ricardo wrote about, called "The Iron Law of Wages," stated that wages should be taxed so much that workers end up taking home just enough to scrape by on. Any increase in wages would be subject to careful planning, and additional taxation. A descendent of David Ricardo—Rita Ricardo-Campbell—was Ronald Reagan's advisor on Social Security and pension benefits.

During the French Revolution, most of the Assembly were Freemasons. After Napoleon had seized then lost power, Lord Castlereagh unwittingly placed control of most of Europe into the hands of the Rothschilds. He made them financially indebted to the Rothschilds, while placing the House of Bourbon into power in France. After meeting with King George IV in 1822, the politically unpopular Castlereagh committed suicide by cutting his throat. Henry Kissinger used the steps taken by Castlereagh as inspiration to formulate his own policy, which he described in a book entitled, A World Restored. Wikipedia paints that Castlereagh as simply a misunderstood genius.

In Chapter 5, Mullins returns to his racist roots, proclaiming the US Constitution to be written for and by the "fair-skinned people of Shem." Any Constitutional amendment granting rights to the "Papuans" (Africans) or the "Slavs" (East Europeans) is a charter to the Canaanite United Nations, and an aggression towards the people of Shem.

Chapter 6 tells of a conspiracy by the Freemasons of Louisiana to acquit Aaron Burr of treason for offering his assistance to the British Secret Intellgence Service. The Freemasons also helped Benedict Arnold get an acquittal for his illegal arms dealing.

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 05:23 PM
Chapter 7 begins by reminding the reader that the Semitic slavemaster in the antebellum South had kindly treated his slaves, who deserved their station in life for bearing the curse of Canaan. Any effort to free the slaves was a conspiracy whose principal aim was the persecution the people of Shem. The leader of the anti-slavery movement was Giuseppe Mazzini, who created the Masonic lodge Propaganda Uno to unify Italy, with help from British intelligence (even today, we see that his efforts to create a united Italy were not entirely successful). His aim wasn't to restore human dignity, but to start revolutions around the world by any means necessary. William Garrison burned a copy of the Constitution, calling it a "covenant with Hell."

Ultimately, outlawing slavery was contingent not on the abolitionist movement, but on the simple economics of financially supporting the slave population.

At this time New Englanders had developed a new religion, called "Transcendentalism" (which is now known as the Fundamentalist movement) that derived from Calvinism and the Kabalah. One of their leaders was John Brown, who was killed for starting a slave revolt by ordering the Knights of the Golden Circle to attack at Harper's Ferry in Ohio.

After the Civil War, the Republicans changed the number of Supreme Court justices from 10 t0 7, which allowed all of Andrew Johnson's vetoes of the Reconstruction Acts to be overridden, and allowed passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The Republicans then made a motion to impeach Johnson, which was denied by one vote. President Ulysees Grant restored the number of Supreme Court justices to 9, ensured that the Reconstruction Acts would remain unchallenged, and declared martial law in the South (which was a Royal Prerogative and invalidated every amendment since the 13th). The Reconstruction and corruption by the scalawags created massive debt in the southern states, resulting in land grabs by the carpetbaggers (most of whom were Masons). Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York was Salomon P. Chase, founder of Chase Bank, which later merged with the Manhattan Company, then J.P. Morgan to become J.P. Morgan Chase. The Rothschilds and the Masons were the biggest financiers to the political corruption in Virginia - from the Reconstruction up to the election of Woodrow Wilson as president. One would have needed approval from the Masons to get a business loan from the bank.

Chapter 8 describes political corruption in Virginia (where Eustance Mullins lives) from the American Revolution to the Civil War. It begins with a story of millionaire Masons who kicked the original First Families of Virginia out of their homes and replaced them with other First Families, such as the Randolphs. Quite a bit of text is devoted to Senator Harry Byrd, Sr.

A book by Vernon Stauffer, New England and the Bavarian Illuminati, contains a speech by Rev. Jedidiah Morse, delivered at Charleston on April 25, 1799: "It has long been suspected that secret societies, under the influence and direction of France, holding principles subversive of our religion and government, existed somewhere in this country .... I have, my brethren, an official, authenticated list of the names, ages, places of nativity, professions &c. of the officers and members of a Society of Illuminati (or as they are now more generally and properly styled Illuminees) consisting of one hundred members, instituted in Virginia, by the Grand Orient of France .... The date of their institution is 1786 ...."

Moore goes on to conclude that 1700 Illuminati agents were operating in the US, and that they had taken over the State of Virginia. The Grand Lodge of Virginia is the oldest independent grand lodge in America. It was established at Williamsburg on Oct 13, 1768 (the official website says Oct 30, 1778). The founding grand master was none other than [ur=,_Jr.]John Blair[/url], whose great-uncle James founded the College of William and Mary. Edmund Randolph became Attorney General of Virigina at age 24, one year after helping write the state's constitution and being initiated into the York Rite of Masonry (Wikipedia is wrong about the date, here). Ten years later, he became Deputy Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Virginia, and the following year was named Grand Master. The Supreme Court of Virginia was constructed inside Staunton Lodge no. 13, which was chartered by Randolph. Randolph frequently sided with Britain during the American Revolution, despite serving as George Washington's aide-de-camp. His father John was a Loyalist, and proved it by taking a one-way trip to England after finishing his term as Mayor of Williamsburg. Edmund moved in with his wealthy uncle []Peyton[/url], who was also Grand Master and Attorney General of Virginia. Edmund participated in writing the US Constitution while serving as Grand Master and Governor of Viriginia simultaneously.

The Constitution was originally meant to be a template from which the states could draft their own laws, but Edmund was able to present his Virginia Plan, which convinced the other delegates that a powerful federal government was needed for national security reasons. After the US was founded, Edmund was selected as its first Attorney General and its second Secretary of State. He surrendered the office of Governor to Beverley Randolph (his 1st cousin, twice removed).

Randolph protected Edmond-Charles Genêt, the ambassador for the French Republic who not only behaved arrogantly during his visit to America, but also hinted that France may take Louisiana and Florida. Thomas Jefferson, rather than removing Genêt, asked George Washington to complain on his behalf then resigned as Secretary of State; the vacated position was filled by cousin Edmund 2 days later. "Citizen Genêt" left to Charleston and was received as a hero by the founders of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. In 1795, Edmund Randolph was finally forced by George Washington to turn in his resignation after hearing rumors of secret financial dealings between Randolph and Claude Fauchet (the French ambassador who replaced Genêt). By the time he left, Randolph had allegedly stolen $110,000 from the treasury (over $100 million today).

Aaron Burr and other Masons aided Genêt in establishing a republic in Louisiana. Although Burr was unsuccessful, Edmund Randolph and then-Chief Justice John Marshall (Grand Master of Viriginia, appointed Deputy Grand Master by Randolph) got an acquittal for Burr. Sweeny was the nephew of George Wythe (the patriach of the American legal profession and singer of the Constitution) who saw to it that Sweeny was acquitted in court. Wythe's illegitimate son inherited a substantial portion from his will, explaining that Sweeny had been stealing from him. Wythe also had an affair with the son after his mulatto mistress Lydia (his only companion for many years) grew old in age. Sweeny murdered his uncle George, and Randolph successfully helped to get him acquited.

It should be noted that Edmund Randolph, Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall and General Robert E. Lee are all related through Edmund's great-grandfather William Randolph.

We also encounter the failure of the Rothschilds to annex the western United States back to Mexico, because of help from the czar of Russia. The Rothschilds punished Russia by creating the Bolshevik Party.

Towards the end of Chapter 8, Mullins gives a personal anecdote where a court ruled that he must turn over a 35-year-old bank account containing all of the profit from one of his books, The History of the Federal Reserve, after suing for embezzlement (he may have hinted earlier that he appeared before the court pro se). He also tells an anecdote of a DuPont heiress who bought her husband the office of the Governor of Viriginia for his birthday, claiming that the chair of the office was the best antique chair she could find in Virginia.

Chapter 9 describes the effect of the Rothschilds on World War. The concern for Nelson Mandela and apartheid was really a cover-up for their concern for the DeBeers diamond mining operation. They reaped billions by speculating on South African currency, whose value dropped by more than 80%.

The book explains the lead up to World War I in terms of a conspiracy among Jews who spoke Spanish and Jewish dialetcs of Spanish in Eastern Europe, around the area that was then called Austria-Hungary (today it makes up parts of Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia). The government of Serbia knew but would not interfere because of fear of retaliation from "a society of secretly-organized men." According to British Foreign Minister Lord Grey, claims that Kaiser Wilhelm pushed for war were actually lies. That's probably why he was never tried for war crimes. Before both world wars, support for war came from the church, false reports in the media demonizing other countries, false-flag attacks, as well as from the anti-war movement.

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 05:24 PM
The Fourteen Points proceeding the aftermath of World War I are said to be drafted by Woodrow Wilson. In actuality they were secretly drawn up by members of the Grand Orient of France at the International Masonic Conference, 2 Rue Cadet, Paris during June 28-30, 1917. Woodrow Wilson was given bribes to go along with the program. When he realized that the Americans would not willing agree to it, he suffered a nervous breakdown from which he never recovered. Wilson was also disappointed when most of the delegates from the League of Nations refused to recognize the Soviet Union, fearing the spread of Communism. He called it a victory for bigotry and intolerance.

The next step was for Bernard Baruch to place impossible sanctions on Germany, causing economic ruin and setting the stage for Hitler to be installed as a dictator. The word "Nazi" is actually a play on words. Ashkenazi, in Hebrew, is related to the land of Askenatz—an area around Germany, Austria and other parts of Eastern European. Ashkenatz is a figure in the Torah who fled to this area after being defeated in war by the Babylonians. According to some rabbinical traditions he is the patriarch of the Germans; according to others, he is the patriarch of all white people. Ostara was a name for the Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring, to whom April, or Öster, is devoted. The 20th day of Öster (Hitler's birthday) was a holiday for the occultists who supported Hitler. Despite efforts to antagnoize Hitler, and to demonize him in the press, neither Germany nor the Americans were interested in fighting one another.

The US was brought into World War II not by any act by the Hitler, but rather Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt was a ne'er-do-well who relied on the British intelligence for advice after Pearl Harbor. The head of British intelligence was Sir Edward Menzies aka "C." He was an illegitimate son of King Edward VII and his wife started the British Fascist movement almost two decades earlier with some of the largest landowners in England: the Earl of Glasgow, the Duke Abercorn, the Marquess of Ailsbury and the Earl of Cardigan. Members of Britain's Special Operations Executive included directors of the Bank of England (which invested in Nazi German corporations), officers in the United Nations, future Prime Minister Hugh Gaitskell, as well as British military personnel. The SOE created the American Office of Strategic Services, which later became the Central Intelligence Agency and was staffed with the ne'er-do-well sons of millionaires and Ivy League graduates. After World War II, the Masonic lodges in Germany and Italy were reopened using money from the OSS and the CIA.

Chapter 10 discusses the high-ranking members of the Communist movement. Members of the First International included Lionel de Rothschild, Karl Marx and Heinrich Heine. Karl Marx was connected to the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and British aristocracy through his marriage to Jenny von Westphalen. The Freemasons provided Marx with steady income by commissioning him to write for newspapers in New York. Vladimir Lenin became a member of the lodge of Ulianov Zederbaum when he lived in Switzerland. He was good friends with Sir Alfred Milner and Lord Palmerston, both of whom were 33° Masons.

After Russian Czar Nicholas II was arrested, a provisional government was set up with Kerensky—a 32° Mason—as its head, chosen by Josef Sliozberg (Grand Master of the International Order of B'nai B'rith in Russia). After Lenin's arrival, Kerensky enjoyed a successful lecturing career in America. Trotsky started his operation with funding from Max Warburg and the Rockefellers. Many banks served as intermediaries. After the Russian revolution, the Soviet government began to siphon money from the bank accounts held by Czar Nicholas II. Apparently, the revolution was directed by Count Volpi di Misurata, a member of the Venetian black nobility who also put Mussolini in power. The banks that invested in the Bolshevik party received a return on their investment from the $30 billion fortune (in 1917 money) held by the czar, including $1 billion in gold reserves; $500 million worth of Romanov jewels; a crown encrusted with 32,000 diamonds; the Great Mogul diamond and the Faberge Egg. Dowager Empress Maria (mother of Czar Nichoals II) obtained some of the jewels. After she died, they were stolen by special agents and given to Queen Mary of Britain.

Most of the shares of the Federal Reserve were bought with about $400 million in the czar's cash deposits that were embezzled by the banks (Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J. P. Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust). According to Mullins, the Romanov family are the rightful heirs to the remaining cash, and to all of the properties which were purchased using embezzled money. Even if they could ever enforce their claims, the interest payments could never be made. Cases which ruled in their favor disappeared from records. Efforts by the Romanovs to withdraw some of the money in 1929 triggered the Great Depression. The Roosevelt-Litvinoff agreements of 1933-34 said that the US would honor claims by the Soviet Union of the Romanov fortune.

Shortly after the Bolshevik Red Faction took power, the White Faction mounted its own initially successful revolution. Foreign troops brought in to aid the Red Faction were actually claimed by Trotsky to be supporting the White Faction. The peasants were awaken out of their apathy to support the Red Faction. After the White Faction was suppressed, the peasants were made into slaves and an order was issued to "intensify the repression of the bougeoisie." The people were considered not humans but "zeks," short for zakluchenny, a Russian word for prisoner. After 40 years, more than 66 million people were killed. The execution chamber of the Cheka (the Soviet secret police) was knee-deep with blood, guts and skull fragments. The walls were completely covered in blood, with pieces of flesh and skull fragments stuck to it. Corpses in various stages of dismemberment and decay, along with unidentifiable bones were scattered about in the room.

There were a number of other communist uprisings, which were unsuccessful. After the downfall of Bela Kun, the Hungarian government published the archives of Masonic lodges proving that the Freemasons had started the Hungarian Communist Revolution. The government shut down Masonic lodges, but were forced to reopen them to get financial support to rebuild the country. In Spain, Communist purification squads, organized by the Cheka, killed as much as one-tenth of the Spanish population.

A Soviet defector told an American publication about how the IRS, Federal Reserve and the CIA office in Vienna had given money for the Soviet secret police, the Communist Party in Italy, and the Communist Party in America. The American troops stationed throughout Europe to protect the US from a Soviet attack were actually protecting supply lines through which goods entered the Soviet Union through philanthropic Communist supporters. Apparently they need to be protected from the peasants who were supposed to receive the goods. Often, instead of being distributed to the people, they were sold for a profit by the Soviet government.

Chapter 11 ties up some odds and ends. It tells of a conspiracy by the IRS to discourage small business, and a conspiracy with the puppet governments in Germany and Italy to make imported cars fashionable in the US. As a result, industrialization and jobs in the US have suffered greatly. An inspiration for the White House was the beehive, which is ironic because it's teeming with rats and flying waterbugs.

It also tells of televangelists preaching against secular humanism while not preaching against the New Englanders who started the Unitarian and Dispensationalist movements to which they ascribe. The Evangelist movement was actually started by British intelligence to introduce secular intellectualism into the church, and to use the church as a sounding board to promote totalitarian utilitarianism (the type of Communism being practiced in the east).

The "Promise" to which Mullins refers is the promise of the land of Israel to the offspring Abraham (the House of Israel and the House of Judah).

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 06:26 PM
reply to post by vcwxvwligen

There seems to be some debate as to whether Mazzini was, in fact, a Mason. I believe at one point I came across one of the Italian grand lodges' websites that said he wasn't. Elsewhere I've seen the claim that when Denslow compiled "10,000 Famous Freemasons" he confused Garibaldi and Mazzini (both of whom were named Giuseppe), and that many of the claims that Mazzini was a Mason are based on his inclusion in that book.

Just throwing that out there, for what it's worth.

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 08:59 PM
reply to post by JoshNorton

According to Il Libro del Massone Italiano, Giuseppe Mazzini wrote about being raised a Master Mason in Savona by a man named "Passano" who was a high-ranking member of the Carbonari.

posted on Jan, 29 2011 @ 09:07 PM

Originally posted by vcwxvwligen

According to Il Libro del Massone Italiano, Giuseppe Mazzini wrote about being raised a Master Mason in Savona by a man named "Passano" who was a high-ranking member of the Carbonari.

Mazzini was a member of a Carbonari Lodge, but according to the Grand Orient of Italy, was not a Mason. Mazzini's most important follower, Garibaldi, was a Mason and served as Grand Master of the Grand Orient, as well as Grand Hierophant of the Rite of Memphis.

posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 02:57 AM
reply to post by Masonic Light

What sources are there to show that the Grand Orient of Italy denies Mazzini was a member?

posted on Feb, 13 2011 @ 11:06 AM
reply to post by vcwxvwligen

Discussed at length via Google translation on the Grand Orient of Italy's website in a number of essays. here

It was Denslow's "10,000 Famous Freemasons" that said he was Past Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy. If that were the case, wouldn't the Grand Orient of Italy list him with their Past Grand Masters here?

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in