It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by CayceFan
Are you really saying that you think women wouldn't balk at the idea of unisex showers? Normal women I mean!
No, I am saying that I have told you 4 times now that I am not going to sit here and repeat myself to someone who openly admits they care too little to read what people respond with. How can I get that through to you?
Originally posted by CayceFan
It sure seemed like that was what you were saying to me. So we are in agreement then that the majority of women would not want unisex showers?
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by CayceFan
It sure seemed like that was what you were saying to me. So we are in agreement then that the majority of women would not want unisex showers?
Not even close.
I have tried now asking you nicely many times to leave me be. You made it clear you are looking to shout, not listen. I have no interest in that. Take it elsewhere. Please do not make me ask you, one adult to another, yet again to stop trolling me.
Originally posted by CayceFan
Stop "trolling" me!
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by CayceFan
Stop "trolling" me!
It was a response to Lemon.Fresh from me that you hijacked to take over this conversation I was having with someone else. It is the exact same thing as the conversation about the word "retard." I was having that conversation with someone else as well, and you came in and started hijacking my replies. You are doing the trolling, the stalking, the useless blathering.
I am sorry if it looked like that to you. That is because you are imagining things. If you can find where I said anything about most women and unisex showers at all, more power to you. I never said either way. Not even hinted. I am going to stop responding to you with this post.
Next time I respond to someone else, do NOT HIJACK THAT RESPONSE again. Then this will all go away. Stop hijacking replies. It is petty and childish.
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by CayceFan
Is that Edgar Cayce fan?
For real? My uncle was a lecturer for the Edgar Cayce Society.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by TexasChem
I believe that the original language does indeed use a word that means "murder" more than it means "kill."
Cool, you believe something. I believe something too. Our beliefs are not the same. Isn't that neat. Now if you can show me any part of the bible that explains volunteering to kill people you are ordered to kill is justifed in the eyes of god for any reason, you might an argument.
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by CayceFan
Is that Edgar Cayce fan?
For real? My uncle was a lecturer for the Edgar Cayce Society.
Didnt you just instruct everyone to ignore me? Now your asking me questions? I dont get it?
Originally posted by Gseven
You obviously have never read ANY portion of the good book, otherwise you would have never stated that.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by Gseven
I am not responding to you. I will never respond to you. I am providing you with information. That is all.
The USA is not a Christian Nation! See ATS thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So is replying and responding two different things here on ATS? Or is that just a gay thing?
IGNORE
Poster just trying to be inflammatory.
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by Gseven
I am not responding to you. I will never respond to you. I am providing you with information. That is all.
The USA is not a Christian Nation! See ATS thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So is replying and responding two different things here on ATS? Or is that just a gay thing?
IGNORE
Poster just trying to be inflammatory.
exhibit A
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CayceFan
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by Gseven
I am not responding to you. I will never respond to you. I am providing you with information. That is all.
The USA is not a Christian Nation! See ATS thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So is replying and responding two different things here on ATS? Or is that just a gay thing?
IGNORE
Poster just trying to be inflammatory.
exhibit A
Perhaps you could try keeping things in perspective.
Again - your prerogative - - it only reflects on you.
Originally posted by CayceFan
You make zero sense. I think I'll take my prerogative and ignore you.
Originally posted by Xavialune
If he doesnt agree with homosexuality, thats fine, he has the right to have his opinions. If he wont be objective about it and if he allows his religious views to affect the whole of his troops, who may not agree with him, then he doesn't belong in the military anyway. He is supposed to be a leader, and I don't see leadership qualities in a person who can't be objective about his troop's training. The training's purpose is to integrate gay people into the military in an open and non-hateful way..it would be attempting to minimize the hate and prejudice against these people..how can one be against that? Simple..because these kinds of people automatically assume it is pushing homosexuality on those who dont agree with it, when in fact it is simply trying to promote tolerance. No one says the training's purpose is to make everyone 'accept' gays and their lifestyle, just tolerate them and minimize acts of hate against them. Everyone deserves at least that and in my eyes this guy is unfit for military leadership if he can't do that.
Aren't military officers supposed to follow all orders anyway? Suddenly it is ok for this kind of defiance? How hypocritical.