posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 12:58 PM
What's always troubled me about those that push the OS is how they act as though the collapse of these towers can only have happened thru
conventional means. Why is that? Is there some rulebook I'm not aware of? The perps on 9/11 had means at their disposal that we probably have never
even heard of. The stealth fighter was around for ten years before we even knew it existed. The trusters are trying very hard to push conventional
means as their reason why it couldn't have been intentional. Why couldn't it have been tactical nukes? Just because there's not a precedent
doesn't mean it's not possible.