It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats all it is though, a theory. It proves nothing. It may very well be wrong.
Just because some people may think things looked wrong, it doesn't mean that things were wrong. Up until 9/11/2001 no one had flown 767 airliners at 400mph+ deliberately into the Twin Towers.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Again with this "conspiracy theorist" label.
I'm going to ask you again, what in the hell is that supposed to mean? Are you saying since you perceive Jones as a "conspiracy theorist," you're more qualified of a scientist than he is now, even on the subject of chemistry?
This IS an independent team of scientists!
in·de·pen·dent (nd-pndnt)
ADJECTIVE:
Free from the influence, guidance, or control of another or others; self-reliant: an independent mind.
Not determined or influenced by someone or something else; not contingent: a decision independent of the outcome of the study.
So you have nothing to say about the fact that the stuff produced iron spheres, something that combustion can't do?
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
Small? Really? Judging by the amount of members here, the amount of conspiracy websites, and the countless television shows of the subject, the nutty group of theorists couldnt possibly be that small. Better get your facts straight. Then again, they (as in trusters) seem to ignore the facts, and rely on hearsay.
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
Your argument is petty and childish. Investigation done by "independent" scientists simply means from those used in the official investigation.
Originally posted by Soloist
I'm going to ask you again, what in the hell is that supposed to mean? Are you saying since you perceive Jones as a "conspiracy theorist," you're more qualified of a scientist than he is now, even on the subject of chemistry?
I'm saying he's biased. Based on your responses and underlying tone you seem to believe you are superior to me somehow, so I'm surprised someone as awesome as you couldn't figure that much out.
This IS an independent team of scientists!
Wow, do you *really* believe that? Are you that blind? I thought you guys wanted the truth, and to ask questions and all that stuff. But you all seem to just accept this junk science and horrible process like it's absolute and infallible.
Let's take a look at the definition of 'independent' , shall we?
in·de·pen·dent (nd-pndnt)
ADJECTIVE:
Free from the influence, guidance, or control of another or others; self-reliant: an independent mind.
Not determined or influenced by someone or something else; not contingent: a decision independent of the outcome of the study.
And we already know that Jones believed fully that them*te was what he thought brought down the towers, he said so in public years earlier. He has a stake in the conspiracy and do A&E who get their money it as well.
So you have nothing to say about the fact that the stuff produced iron spheres, something that combustion can't do?
There isn't anything to say until a true independent team of scientists who gather samples and test them properly. Why don't you guys want this? Ask yourself what you're afraid of? If you're so confident this is all correct, why in the world would you NOT want it verified?
Originally posted by Soloist
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
Your argument is petty and childish. Investigation done by "independent" scientists simply means from those used in the official investigation.
No it does not. Please read the above definition of "independent" that *I* provided.
Please try and understand the material before accusing someone of being petty and childish, which is actually what you are doing by refusing to understand what is written.
And how in the hell is someone supposed to ever be "independent" in your mind when as soon as they voice these kinds of statements, you immediately label them "conspiracy theorists" and say they're "biased" and so don't count? You want your cake and to eat it too; ie, you want to ask for independent scientists but then claim they're all biased as soon as they speak up. That is where the blindness is.
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by impressme
At best, under the circumstances, he has an interesting theory.
2005: USGS Documents Iron-Rich Spheroids
Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust
Aluminothermic Residues
Form and Composition of Dust Particles Indicates Aluminothermics
Thats all it is though, a theory. It proves nothing. It may very well be wrong.
Originally posted by OptimistPrime
reply to post by kalamatas
I think he is alluding to before 9/11. He believes that the spheres were there because Jim Lecce was dabbling in metal sculpting. Along with that, the man was brazing iron inside his high priced apt. with a handheld propane torch and this is what caused those iron spheres to appear.